Britain’s memory of war and the Brexit debate | Letters

Readers respond after the outgoing German ambassador says some Brexiters were motivated by a sense of national identity built around the UK standing alone

Will continental politicians and diplomats ever realise that the UK is not abandoning Europe, but leaving the EU (German ambassador tells Brexiters: stop fixating on second world war, 30 January)? If the German ambassador wants to understand the “finest hour” legend, he should look for the truth beneath the mythology. In standing alone the British people put the interests of Europe first, resolving to die fighting rather than allow the Nazis to dominate the continent.

I shudder to think what might have been. Lord Halifax did have a point: we had secure links to a maritime empire and pacifist public opinion throughout the Anglosphere would have allowed Hitler to dominate Europe. With entente with the Nazis, Britain could have reaped the profits of empire, and dealt with the real threat to their imperial and commercial prosperity in the Far East.

Britain took an expensive stand for the freedom of Europe in 1940. I have every confidence we would do so again, whether or not were were members of the EU, and the peoples of Europe know it. Those of who voted leave ask only for the democratic result of the referendum to be honoured. If the EU wishes to trade with us they will help create an appropriate trading relationship in a spirit of respect and goodwill.
David Horsley
Huddersfield, West Yorkshire

• I think Peter Ammon is absolutely right. I was a child in the 1950s, with parents and grandparents who had experienced two devastating and brutal world wars in 20 years. They rarely talked to me of their war, but the mantra “the only good German is a dead German” was often added to the end of any story they did tell. An understandable motivation while fighting an existential struggle, undeniably.

Look at the backgrounds of the Brexit MPs, and many will have had military forebears who instilled the same mantra.

As a young man in my 20s I worked in Berlin in the 1970s, and all the Germans I met there were determined that the horrors of all-out war should not come again, and that they would build a peaceful Europe against whatever odds. They changed my thinking completely.

Putting aside racial hatred is difficult, and so is making friends with former enemies (see Northern Ireland), but talking is so much better than fighting. I grew up seeing the bomb-damaged cities of the Midlands and elsewhere in Britain – have we forgotten so soon?

Remember how much total war costs in human and prosperity terms, and a talking-shop insurance policy like the EU begins to look very good value for money. If only we hadn’t sent our second-best politicians there.

How can anybody be naive enough to advocate cutting the multitude of political, administrative, commercial, technological and personal relationships built up over 40 years with our closest neighbours, in favour of trying to build new bonds with countries much further away, some of whom do not share our societal values and perhaps should be more cautiously regarded as our political rivals in the world?
Peter Harris
Pershore, Worcestershire

• So the “German ambassador tells Brexiters: stop fixating on second world war”. I might have been more convinced had your front page not also carried an article headlined “VW tested diesel fumes on monkeys and humans”. We already know of the Nazis’ use of vehicle fumes in their criminal experiments to murder large groups of unwanted people. Chillingly, VW have joined up the present and the past so many, like me, will make the connection back to those experiments. I write as a convinced (Jewish) remainer and among my reasons for supporting remain is precisely the second world war, and the hope of avoiding a third. This is never far from my mind.
Lawrence Suss
Brighton

• I am a war child and lived with my parents and four siblings two miles from a Spitfire airfield, so we saw a lot of action. We were not particularly protected from the news and the horrors of war, and when peace came once more we were overjoyed to have a new government in place that would make a real difference to those in need, and it did. I welcomed our entry into the European Union (stronger together!) and am appalled by the self-serving behaviour, the lies and the posturing of this present apology for government, and the misguided beliefs of a sizable section of the population.
Ruth Baden
Seer Green, Buckinghamshire

• The German ambassador in his valedictory speech said that Britain was rightly proud of its history. Quite. But among the most justifiable causes for pride in our relatively recent history are our contribution to the postwar peace in Europe, the building of the welfare state and the creation of the NHS, all of which achievements are currently jeopardised by the vainglorious jingoism of ideologues hellbent on their destruction. It is incumbent upon those of us who take a rightful pride in these achievements to stand up for them in the face of this threat.
Austen Lynch
Garstang, Lancashire

• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com

• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters

Letters

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
EU friends of Britain say: we want you to stay | Letters
Letters: European Guardian readers share their sadnesses and frustrations regarding Brexit

Letters

18, Dec, 2018 @5:16 PM

Article image
Britain stood alone? Let’s consign that myth to history | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to Michael Knowles’s letter on Brexit, where he claimed the rest of Europe should remember its debt to Britain from the second world war

Letters

09, Sep, 2018 @5:36 PM

Article image
The value of a customs union and striking deals | Letters
Letters: Richard Tudway says Britain is a small bit in a much bigger picture, Martin London thinks the country is run by salesmen, David Lawrence addresses the Irish border, Christopher Clayton and Brian Willan have different takes on Michael Morpurgo’s Brexit perspective, David Beake says cooking up a deal with a Marxist is nothing new, Haydn Thomas thinks the Commons should be turned into a museum and Ros Jones sees the funny side of Anish Kapoor’s latest artwork

Letters

05, Apr, 2019 @3:43 PM

Article image
The Brexit bill and Britain’s war debts | Letters
Letters: Andrew Kinnison comes to the defence of Michael Knowles, whose pro-Brexit letter provoked a strong response from readers. Plus, Charmaine Fletcher on the Greeks’ resistance against fascism

Letters

12, Sep, 2018 @4:34 PM

Article image
Leaders should heed Franklin Medhurst’s Brexit plea | Letters
Letters: Hilary Foord praises Franklin Medhurst’s viral letter from 2016, Laura Field has found a metaphor for Corbyn’s indecision, and Alicia Baker wonders if Nigel Farage’s Brexit party is specifically targeting women

Letters

07, May, 2019 @4:56 PM

Article image
Manuel Valls and Len McCluskey rev up the Brexit debate | Letters
Letters: Matt Kilcoyne says that Manuel Valls has made the prime Euro-federalist mistake in saying their way is the only way to a good outcome. David Head says being a Unite member at Honda has no value with McCluskey in charge

Letters

08, Mar, 2019 @4:45 PM

Article image
Theresa May’s Brexit speech had shades of Hitler | Letters
Letters: Jonathan Davis and Andy Hollis trace the rhetoric of ‘citizens of nowhere’

Letters

12, Oct, 2018 @3:42 PM

Article image
Boris Johnson and a warning from history | Letters
Letters: I pray for our PM and hope that I am needlessly crying wolf, writes Canon Dr Paul Oestreicher, who fled the Nazis as a child. Plus letters from Professor Bob Brecher and Pat Kennedy

Letters

31, Jul, 2019 @4:16 PM

Article image
The best place to answer the call of nature? | Brief letters
Brief letters: Referendums | Stupidity | National Trust land | The DUP | Public toilets

Letters

15, Oct, 2018 @3:55 PM

Article image
Brexit developments – or not | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to the government’s latest Brexit announcement and resignations

Letters

09, Jul, 2018 @4:57 PM