Your editorial (Reality is dawning for the PM that leaving the EU is a self-harming, 9 July) seems to overlook the number of people in Labour-held constituencies who also voted to leave, though probably for different reasons to Conservatives. How do remainers persuade them that “coming out” won’t be a bed of roses? Many voted to leave as a sign of disenchantment with what they saw as government policies that disregarded their perceived local needs. At present I don’t see anything that has fundamentally changed to alter their justification for thinking that way.
Richard Ehlers
Downham Market, Norfolk

• The government’s Brexit plan continues to rely on an utterly false division between the customs union and the single market. Take the construction products regulation. This is a vital single market regulation ensuring the reliability of information on the performance of construction products. For the construction industry, this is just as important as having no customs tariffs. Doing business is a mixture of smoothly handling both tangible products and intangible processes. We are still doing well because goods, services and people are still flowing smoothly across our borders. It is reckless to mess about with this fragile status quo when it is working so well.
Andrew Wilks
London

• They never thought we could leave, then that we would leave; now they think we will leave in name only. If we believe Airbus, BMW, Siemens etc then we must “save jobs” by capitulation to our new masters. But since these corporations trade with, export to, export from, construct in and obey the rules of eg the US, without the US being in the EU how credible is their threat to abandon billions of pounds of investment in non-EU Britain?
Rodney Atkinson
Author, Europe’s Full Circle

• My wife and I recently cancelled our membership of a healthcare society that we had been with for over 40 years. Membership had been useful but we felt it would not best match future needs. The cancellation was handled efficiently and courteously. Soon after leaving we received letters inviting us to rejoin – with the added bonus of a Marks and Spencer gift card if we do so “today”. Perhaps the EU should consider something similar next April?
Rod Logan
Walton-on-Thames, Surrey

• I’ve calculated (trust me, I’m a statistician) that Mrs May’s Chequers accord is exactly 52% of a full Brexit and is thus completely congruous with “the will of the people”. David Davis proudly recites this cliché so why has he now resigned (Report, 9 July)?
Paul Farrow
Llandaff, Cardiff

• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com

• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters

Letters

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
The Guardian view on Brexit and the Bank: the challenge of populism | Editorial
Editorial: It is 20 years since the Bank of England gained independence. It may not survive the nationalist pressures of leaving the EU

Editorial

28, Sep, 2017 @6:16 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Jeremy Corbyn and industry: what the state can do | Editorial
Editorial: Britain is still the world’s eighth largest manufacturer, but Brexit makes the need for support more critical than ever

Editorial

25, Jul, 2018 @5:26 PM

Article image
Brexit stockpiling and the bullwhip effect | Letters
Letters: Professors Alan McKinnon and Jan Fransoo on the long-term effects of the threat of a no-deal Brexit, Peter Lowe on David Cameron’s barring from parliament and Martin Guha on a job swap for Jeremy Corbyn and Caroline Lucas

Letters

04, Jan, 2019 @4:50 PM

Article image
Brexit: the Irish question and the English puzzle | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to a Guardian article by Fintan O’Toole

Letters

21, Nov, 2018 @5:41 PM

Article image
The Guardian view of Philip Hammond and Airbus: stand tall for jobs | Editorial
Editorial: In his big speech this week the chancellor made a general case for soft Brexit. The Airbus disinvestment threat shows that he must sharpen his game

Editorial

22, Jun, 2018 @4:15 PM

Article image
Delving deeper into the Brexit arithmetic | Letters
Letters: Readers dissect the mathematics behind Monday’s indicative votes and respond to articles by Polly Toynbee and Dawn Foster

Letters

02, Apr, 2019 @5:39 PM

Article image
Chequers Brexit summit only muddies the water | Letters
Letters: SP Chakravarty says the Chequers agreement puts negotiators on both sides of the Channel at a disadvantage; Laurence Williamson writes that Tony Benn’s ‘red lines’ must inform Corbyn’s position on Brexit; plus letters from a group of MEPs, Colleen Darby and Peter Fellows

Letters

08, Jul, 2018 @4:08 PM

Article image
Brexit contortions, kamikaze ministers and parliament’s finest hour | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to recent developments in the Commons and elsewhere as the clock runs down to the article 50 deadline

Letters

28, Feb, 2019 @6:27 PM

Article image
Letters: the Brexit fantasies that left us staring into the abyss
Letters: Frank Field MP, Jon Bloomfield, Ron Glatter, Peter Clarke, Margaret Pelling, Anna Ford and others respond to the latest Brexit developments and to an Owen Jones article

Letters

14, Mar, 2019 @6:25 PM

Article image
The value of a customs union and striking deals | Letters
Letters: Richard Tudway says Britain is a small bit in a much bigger picture, Martin London thinks the country is run by salesmen, David Lawrence addresses the Irish border, Christopher Clayton and Brian Willan have different takes on Michael Morpurgo’s Brexit perspective, David Beake says cooking up a deal with a Marxist is nothing new, Haydn Thomas thinks the Commons should be turned into a museum and Ros Jones sees the funny side of Anish Kapoor’s latest artwork

Letters

05, Apr, 2019 @3:43 PM