China's nuclear power plants pass safety inspections

Regulators give country's 13 reactors the all-clear following checks ordered in wake of Fukushima disaster

China has moved a step closer towards resuming its ambitious nuclear power plans after it was revealed that safety inspectors have given the country's 13 reactors the all-clear.

The clean bill of health makes it more likely that Beijing will not follow the example of other countries – most recently German, Italy and Japan – who have promised to scale back or abandon nuclear power in the wake of the meltdown at the Fukushima Dai-ichi plant in March.

China has the world's biggest nuclear expansion plans with a goal of more than 100 reactors by 2020, but it suspended permits for new plants after the tsunami disaster in Japan.

The government said it would not be resumed until existing plants were checked, construction plans reviewed and a new national safety framework put in place.

That process is now well under way, according to a statement by the deputy environment minister, Li Ganjie, posted on a government website. As well as the completed checks for plants in operation, reviews of facilities under construction would be finished by October, he said.

Few analysts expect China to trim or delay targets that were included in the latest five-year economic plan to meet the power demands of a growing economy, while reducing the country's reliance on greenhouse gas-emitting fuel sources.

But critical voices have grown louder. Professor He Zuoxiu, who helped to develop China's first atomic bomb, caused a storm last month when he claimed that plans to ramp up production of nuclear energy twentyfold by 2030 could be as disastrous as the Great Leap Forward.

Writing in the Science Times, he criticised government advisers for failing to disclose the earthquake risks posed to nuclear power plants and said they had overestimated the availability of uranium in the country and the maturity of fission technology.

"Are we really ready for this kind of giddy speed [of nuclear power development]? I think not – we're seriously underprepared, especially on the safety front," wrote the fellow of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Nuclear power executives are counting on China to make up for demand that is being lost elsewhere amid the radiation fears prompted by Fukushima.

Japan, Germany and Switzerland have all move to scale back nuclear power as a result of that disaster. China merely put its programme on hold to assess safety concerns.

In the latest setback for the industry, the Italian electorate voted overwhelmingly against proposals to revive the country's nuclear energy programme.

China, however, is still on course to have a nuclear capacity of 200 gigawatts by 2030 and 400GW by 2050 - more than 15% of the national energy supply.

Contributor

Text Reader Listen to this page

Jonathan Watts, Asia environment correspondent

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
The truth about the Fukushima 'nuclear samurai'

Japan's 'nuclear samurai' are risking their lives to avert catastrophe, but many are manual labourers unequal to the task

Suzanne Goldenberg in Yonezawa

21, Mar, 2011 @6:23 PM

Article image
China warned over 'insane' plans for new nuclear power plants
He Zuoxiu, a leading Chinese scientist, says the country is not investing enough in safety controls after lifting of post-Fukushima disaster reactor ban

Emma Graham-Harrison in Beijing

25, May, 2015 @1:41 PM

Article image
Short-term thinking of UK nuclear policy | Letters
Letters: Sue Roaf writes that evacuation plans for Hinkley Point would have to involve at least a million people; while Diarmuid Foley says that, in the modern world, the route to weapons-grade material is not taken through the civilian nuclear fuel cycle

Letters

03, Jan, 2018 @6:05 PM

Article image
Fukushima grapples with toxic soil that no one wants
Eight years after the triple disaster, not a single location will take the millions of cubic metres of radioactive soil that remain

Justin McCurry in Okuma

11, Mar, 2019 @8:25 AM

Article image
Has the Chernobyl disaster affected the number of nuclear plants built?
Thirty years on from one of the worst radiation leaks in history, several countries have moved to phase out nuclear energy production altogether, and experts say another accident would kill the industry

Charlotte Beale

30, Apr, 2016 @8:00 AM

Article image
UN's nuclear watchdog IAEA under fire over response to Japanese disaster
IAEA and Japanese secretary-general accused of ignoring lessons of Chernobyl and letting firms cut corners at Fukushima

Julian Borger, diplomatic editor

15, Mar, 2011 @8:34 PM

Letters: Renewed push for nuclear power
Letters: Proponents of integral fast reactors have so far failed to answer three key questions: do these reactors work, how much do they cost, and how long will they take to build

08, Feb, 2012 @9:00 PM

Letters: Nuclear risks and the renewable alternatives
Letters: The coalition should reverse Labour's dangerous decision to go for new nuclear build and use the money saved, firstly to strengthen our current nuclear facilities against terrorist attack, secondly to solve the long-term nuclear waste problem and thirdly to support renewables

16, Mar, 2011 @12:05 AM

Article image
Japan's nuclear fears intensify at two Fukushima power stations

Authorities scramble to control overheating reactors at one plant, as state of emergency declared at second nearby

Ian Sample, Science correspondent

13, Mar, 2011 @7:39 PM

Nuclear power: After the flood | Editorial
Editorial: The tendency in Britain to postpone politically painful choices about building new nuclear stations is dangerous

Editorial

15, Mar, 2011 @12:05 AM