There is hope for a new test to diagnose early-stage lung cancer | Letters

Pauline Armory and Maxine Arnott write about a recently completed trial that has the potential to detect lung cancer with a blood test and Prof Martin Marshall says it wrong to blame GPs for failing to spot symptoms

You rightly report that one of the key reasons lung cancer is the biggest cause of cancer deaths in the UK is that up to 56% of lung cancers are only discovered in A&E where patients present with late-stage symptoms, by which point they often have only months to live (Report, 31 January).

Every year in the UK around 40,000 people are diagnosed with lung cancer and 35,000 people die – it kills more women, for instance, than breast, cervical and ovarian cancers combined, and is the world’s biggest cancer killer.

However, there is hope. We write as the clinical trial manager and a nurse involved in the recently completed Early Detection of Lung Cancer in Scotland trial. This trial undertaken by NHS Tayside, Glasgow and Greater Clyde and Lanarkshire in association with the University of Dundee, involved 12,209 patients and was co-funded by the Scottish Chief Scientist office, the Scottish government and UK biotech company, Oncimmune.

Early detection is the key to stop the unacceptably high death rate as early-stage lung cancer has a five-year survival rate of almost 60% – late detected lung cancer has a five-year survival rate of only 3%.

We have all been lucky enough to witness first-hand a small number of patients’ lives being saved by ground breaking new British technology. While we are hopeful, further results, analysis and research is needed before the blood test can be considered for wider use by the NHS in the at-risk population.
Pauline Armory Registered nurse, MSc, clinical trial manager
Maxine Arnott Registered nurse

• It is wrong to put the blame of late-stage lung cancer diagnosis on GPs, who overall are doing a good job of referring patients with suspected cancers, with more than 75% of patients who are found to have cancer being referred after just one or two consultations.

The symptoms of lung cancer – principally a prolonged cough – are also symptoms of more common, less serious conditions, making the decision to refer a difficult one, as it must be balanced with risks associated with overdiagnosis, and overburdening specialist services.

GPs need better access to diagnostic tests in the community and training to use them and interpret the results so that our decision to refer can be as informed as it possibly can be.

What GPs don’t need is undue criticism for a situation beyond their control when they are working under intense pressure, without the sufficient time or resources required to provide the holistic care that GPs excel at delivering.
Prof Martin Marshall
Chair of the Royal College of GPs

• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com

• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters

• Do you have a photo you’d like to share with Guardian readers? Click here to upload it and we’ll publish the best submissions in the letters spread of our print edition

• The first letter (by Pauline Armory and Maxine Arnott) was amended on 19 February 2020 to remove comment on trial data that had yet to be verified.

Letters

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Lung cancer blood test for smokers goes on trial

Tests will be carried out on 10,000 patients identified as having a higher risk of developing disease

Barry Neild

23, Mar, 2012 @1:49 AM

Blood test hope to treat lung cancer

Scientists have raised hopes of finding a blood test for lung cancers which would improve the survival chances of thousands of sufferers whose condition might be detected earlier.

James Meikle, health correspondent

13, Mar, 2002 @9:38 AM

Article image
Let’s talk about cancer treatment, not ‘cancer journeys’ | Letters
Letters: Oversharing may be better than the dreadful silence that once surrounded ‘the big C’, but many patients might prefer more practical advice

Letters

23, Apr, 2018 @5:02 PM

Article image
It's time to stop ignoring lung cancer
Thirty percent of people with lung cancer will die within 90 days of being diagnosed – how can that prognosis be improved and is it time for a national screening programme?

Joanna Moorhead

22, Oct, 2014 @10:19 AM

Article image
Hundreds of lung cancer patients may be dying early each year
More than 800 people die prematurely each year due to disparities in treatment across England, research suggests

Nicola Davis

07, Mar, 2018 @6:30 AM

Article image
The Guardian view on a new test for cancer: grounds for optimism | Editorial
Editorial: Early diagnosis is essential if survival rates are to improve, and the announcement of a trial starting next year is a promising sign

Editorial

01, Dec, 2020 @7:03 PM

Article image
Covid-19 has put cancer patients and research at huge risk
Letters: Patients are missing out on vital care and charities funding research have been hit by the pandemic, says Prof Ara Darzi

Letters

03, May, 2020 @5:21 PM

Article image
The best 70th birthday presents we could give to the NHS | Letters
Letters: On the 70th anniversary of the founding of the NHS, readers celebrate its achievements and worry for its future

Letters

04, Jul, 2018 @5:13 PM

Article image
'Holy grail of cancer research': doctors positive about early detection blood test
Blood tests called liquid biopsies show signs of finding cancers at an early stage

Jessica Glenza in New York

01, Jun, 2018 @6:33 AM

Gene cell test may aid early lung cancer diagnosis

Scientists hope the analysis of which genes are switched on and off in cells lining the airways leading to the lungs can be used to diagnose patients sooner and make treatments more effective.

James Randerson, science correspondent

05, Mar, 2007 @12:11 AM