Boundary tinkering won’t fix a broken electoral system | Letters

Forget redrawing constituency boundaries, just implement proportional representation, writes Alan Fowler. Plus letters from Phil Tate and David Nowell

Electoral demographics are changing dramatically and yet the Boundary Commission is busily shuffling deckchairs while the ship of democracy lies becalmed (UK electoral officials announce biggest shake-up of boundaries in decades, 8 June).

While it attends to the arithmetical niceties of rejigging electoral boundaries, in an attempt to ensure that they all contain around 73,400 constituents each, the fact remains that, due to the distortions of our first-past-the-post voting system, these changes will do nothing whatsoever to correct the absurdity of the existing democratic deficit, and may actually make it worse.

For example, in the last election it required 866,000 Green electors to cast their votes to secure each Green parliamentary seat, 336,000 votes for each Liberal Democrat seat and 51,000 for each Labour one. But it required only 39,000 votes per Tory seat and 26,000 per SNP equivalent. Surely democracy requires not only that we are all given a vote, but also that all votes count equally when we cast them. Why are we prepared to tolerate anything less? Apart from Belarus, the UK is now the only country in Europe that still operates this unfair and outdated voting system in which most votes are wasted and only those in marginal constituencies determine which political party forms the government.

Surely our electoral officials could be much more constructively employed in addressing the issue of how to design a fairer system of proportional representation that ensures all votes count equally.
Alan Fowler
Newcastle upon Tyne

• The British have always been adept at drawing arbitrary lines on maps. Here in Chester, neighbours on different sides of a small brook in the south of the city will henceforth be in different constituencies. But it’s nothing new. Residents living in odd-numbered houses on Boundary Lane are in England; those with even numbers are in Wales.

Cheshire West and Chester council, having suffered £466m in cumulative central government funding cuts, is looking to charge £40 per year for garden waste collection. Welsh residents already pay – but they do have free prescriptions. It is no wonder politicians are held in disrepute, with residents not knowing who provides their services or to whom to complain. The government should call a halt to this farce, stop splitting neighbour from neighbour, and have the Boundary Commission start to align parliamentary, council and other local boundaries.
Phil Tate
Chester

• Unwittingly, by insisting on, at most, a 5% variance in average electorates for the 2023 parliamentary boundary review, the over-representation of mainly wealthier people registered at two addresses becomes more significant. This will also casually rip up many more established historic political identities than necessary.

No other country with a single seat electoral system has such a mathematical straightjacket. Germany allows for 15% divergence, 25% in exceptional circumstances. US congressional districts go up in whole numbers between states, and the French would never allow their constituencies to straddle departmental boundaries.
David Nowell
New Barnet, London

Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication.

Letters

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Electoral reform and making every vote count | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to Polly Toynbee’s call for the Labour leadership candidates to back proportional representation

Letters

15, Jan, 2020 @4:38 PM

Article image
Labour should fight for electoral reform | Letter
Letter: Labour parliamentary candidates and other supporters of Make Votes Matter call on the party to back a system of proportional representation

Letters

14, Nov, 2019 @6:23 PM

Article image
First-past-the-post system breeds cynical and disaffected voters | Letters
Letters: Neal Lawson of Compass and others on the urgent need for electoral reform and why without it elections will continue to be just guessing games

Letters

08, Jan, 2020 @6:15 PM

Article image
Labour must embrace radical electoral reform | Letters
Letters: A group of activists and trade unionists urge the party to abolish the House of Lords, while Theo Morgan writes that replacing FPTP with proportional representation is essential. Plus, John Forsyth suggests relocating parliament away from London

Letters

07, Nov, 2019 @6:11 PM

Article image
Progressive politics and the art of compromise | Letter
Letters: Philip Wood and Alan Terry on their hopes for electoral reform and cooperation between parties

Letters

26, Apr, 2021 @4:33 PM

Article image
Vote share paints a different picture of election results | Letters
Letters: Readers point out that the first past the post system distorts the scale of Labour’s electoral losses and the extent of the Conservative party’s popularity

Letters

19, Dec, 2019 @6:21 PM

Article image
Our broken politics needs a major shake-up, from PR voting to citizens’ assemblies | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to Rafael Behr’s article about fixing a sclerotic political system

25, Feb, 2024 @6:47 PM

Article image
Why first past the post is the last thing we need in British politics | Letters
Letters: Sweeping electoral reform is vital to ensure the future of progresssive politics, says Peter Mendenall, Lyn A Dade, Neil Blackshaw and Jonathan Allum

11, May, 2023 @4:01 PM

Article image
How to fix a broken parliamentary system | Letters
Letters: Readers air their views on the UK’s constitutional crisis over Brexit

Letters

28, Mar, 2019 @6:22 PM

Article image
Boundary changes are not a democratic reform | Letters
Letters: The only reform that would make all votes of equal value would be adoption of a voting system based on proportional representation

Letters

29, Aug, 2016 @5:00 PM