Labour must embrace radical electoral reform | Letters

A group of activists and trade unionists urge the party to abolish the House of Lords, while Theo Morgan writes that replacing FPTP with proportional representation is essential. Plus, John Forsyth suggests relocating parliament away from London

Polly Toynbee is spot-on in her analysis of the democratic deficit Britain is faced with (Journal, 5 November). Leading Brexiters are very keen to talk about democracy, and the will of the people, but are strangely silent on the large proportion of the electorate whose votes are wasted under the current system. First past the post has benefited successive rightwing governments, allowing them to rule the majority on a minority of votes.

In the year of the 200th anniversary of the Peterloo massacre, it is Labour who must take the lead on democracy. Millions of potential Labour supporters are stuck in safe Tory seats, or know they must tactically vote Lib Dem rather than for Labour’s radical proposals.

This is why I joined the Labour Campaign for Electoral Reform, who want the party to adopt proportional representation in its manifesto. Remember the words of the late Robin Cook: “Democracy is not just a means to an end. Democracy is a value in itself. And if we treasure that value, we need to provide a more democratic system for the centrepiece of our own political structure.”
Theo Morgan
London

• As trade unionists and progressives, we urge Labour to give a clear manifesto commitment to building a politics for the many, including overhauling the undemocratic House of Lords.

Two hundred years since people died for the right to vote at Peterloo, it is an ongoing scandal that so many of our parliamentarians remain unelected. Few could deny that Westminster is broken. Just 4% of people feel fully able to influence decisions in parliament, according to a BMG poll. It’s no wonder: politics remains undemocratic and hugely centralised, hoarding power for the few when we need to be sharing it.

Labour’s slogan “for the many, not the few” can only be realised by committing to replacing the unelected House of Lords with a PR-elected scrutiny chamber, representing all the nations and regions of the UK.

With a general election mandate from the public, this can be done in the first five years after winning power. Polling for the Electoral Reform Society shows what a vote-winner overhauling this private members’ club could be. With overwhelming cross-party support for change, this is a powerful coalition which Labour must lead. Committing to real reform would show that Labour stands for all voters, not just a privileged elite.
Pauline Bryan Labour peer, Lynn Henderson PCS national officer, former TUC Scotland president, Shavanah Taj vice president of Wales TUC, Sam Tarry TSSA national political officer and PPC for Ilford South, Alexandra Runswick director of Unlock Democracy, Holly Rigby journalist

• Your editorial (Labour’s plans are radical and needed to fix the economy and democracy, 5 November) and Polly Toynbee’s plea for electoral reform are both right, but missing the key radical initiative which this moment demands – reform of both Houses of Parliament, linked to moving parliament to a new site away from London.

It’s not a new idea, but its time has surely come. Reform of the Commons and the Lords is essential. We need parliament to make a radical break from its roots in the old, crumbling buildings. Just think how much we need reconstruction after the devastating, destructive sight of parliamentary “debates” and the gridlock of Brexit and two-party politics, watched in disbelief by disenfranchised voters. “Westminster” is now a dirty word, a synonym for a bubble remote from real life and rational thinking.

Move parliament to the Midlands or the north, as a great symbolic gesture of renewal and rebuilding of national cohesion; build modern debating chambers to encourage a new era of intelligent non-sectarian representation; provide up-to-date facilities for MPs with the finest sustainable modern architecture as a symbol of what Britain can do.

By all means preserve the current buildings to represent the glorious and not so glorious past of the “mother of parliaments”. But please let’s move on. The party that puts this in its manifesto gets my vote!
John Forsyth
Penzance, Cornwall

• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com

• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters

• Do you have a photo you’d like to share with Guardian readers? Click here to upload it and we’ll publish the best submissions in the letters spread of our print edition

Letters

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Labour should fight for electoral reform | Letter
Letter: Labour parliamentary candidates and other supporters of Make Votes Matter call on the party to back a system of proportional representation

Letters

14, Nov, 2019 @6:23 PM

Article image
The most stable, successful nations in the world have PR, so why can’t we? | Letters
Letters: Sarah Hudspith on proportional representation, Peter Feeney and Keith Flett on digital media and electoral law and Ian Hollingworth on Labour council group elections

Letters

28, Jun, 2018 @5:17 PM

Article image
Electoral reform and making every vote count | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to Polly Toynbee’s call for the Labour leadership candidates to back proportional representation

Letters

15, Jan, 2020 @4:38 PM

Article image
An overhaul of Westminster politics is long overdue | Letter
Letter: On Democracy Day, leading campaigners for electoral reform urge parties to make transforming the political system a top priority

Letters

05, Dec, 2019 @12:44 PM

Article image
Labour must be the party of electoral reform | Letters
Letters: It must build a consensus for a new voting model before the next election, says Dr Anthony Isaacs. Plus letters from Sandy Martin, Glyn Evans and Michael Radcliffe

Letters

29, Sep, 2022 @3:52 PM

Article image
A democracy to reflect the will of the people | Letters
Letters: If the Lords were elected more proportionately, it would arguably have more legitimacy than the Commons, writes David Lipsey. Westminster operates regardless of devolution, says Tom Jackson

Letters

25, Jun, 2018 @5:16 PM

Article image
Boundary tinkering won’t fix a broken electoral system | Letters
Letters: Forget redrawing constituency boundaries, just implement proportional representation, writes Alan Fowler. Plus letters from Phil Tate and David Nowell

Letters

09, Jun, 2021 @4:35 PM

Article image
What Britain needs is a radical reshaping of its political system
Letters: Andy Burnham’s call for a reinvention of power and politics is lauded by Roger Read and Neil Richardson. Plus Dr Anthony Isaacs on the role of the opposition and electoral pacts

Letters

10, Jul, 2022 @4:21 PM

Article image
How Labour can benefit from a principled stand in favour of electoral reform | Letters
Letters: Readers reflect on a Guardian editorial urging Labour to back proportional representation, and Gordon Brown’s commission

14, Dec, 2022 @6:26 PM

Article image
Progressive politics and the art of compromise | Letter
Letters: Philip Wood and Alan Terry on their hopes for electoral reform and cooperation between parties

Letters

26, Apr, 2021 @4:33 PM