Are pre-school children too stressed?

If children are stressed in early years education, we should look to the circumstances of their parents, not the 'nappy curriculum'

In an open letter to the Daily Telegraph yesterday, academics and other interested parties were castigating the "nappy curriculum", a set of requirements for pre-school children that author Philip Pullman and others see as standing in the way of "spontaneous play". Meanwhile, the Association of Teachers and Lecturers has reported a marked increase in children not being potty trained before they start school. The world appears to be pulling in two different directions – with far more expected of children at school, and far fewer demands made at home.

Actually, I think both stories reflect the same trend: a belief that school can do absolutely everything for a child that originates in policy but feeds into parental expectation.

The fixation with early years learning – held by the coalition and the Labour government before it – is an attempt to solve the inequality that successive studies have shown to be locked in by the age of five. If only government, with children's centres, targets and curricula, could intervene, with equally high expectations of everybody, then inequality would be eradicated. That was the plan, anyway. Opponents now counter that this constant monitoring ruins children's peace of mind. I disagree with both, and this isn't evidence-based (in fairness, neither is any of the policy, or if it is, only by the most tangential reading of the evidence). Pre-school kids may be given weekly homework and a book to take home, and, to an adult, that sounds like a big ask. But a kid would no more interpret this as pressure than they would being asked to eat broccoli or put their own shoes on. Reading a book is far less onerous than the harassment of the "please" and "thank you" agenda. You are constantly hassling your children; that's what childhood is, and always has been.

If they are stressed, it's because their parents are stressed; they can no more be separated from the emotional temperature of their household than they can be "lifted out of poverty" while their parents are still in it. Oh, which reminds me, if their parents are stressed, it's most probably because of the contraction of household budgets. Don't follow the curriculum looking for answers; follow the money.

Contributor

Zoe Williams

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
New exclamation mark rules – proof that The Man wants to penalise enthusiasm!
New guidelines from the Department for Education suggest that primary school children should only use ‘!’ in sentences starting with ‘what’ or ‘how’. How strange!

07, Mar, 2016 @12:31 PM

Article image
School absences are a sign the curriculum could be failing children | Letters
Letters: Chris Parker calls for an emphasis on the whole child rather than exams and rigid learning, and Simon Gibbs asks whether pupils have lost faith in the system

29, Mar, 2024 @5:17 PM

Article image
Michael Gove's national curriculum reforms: where's the creativity?
We could look to the unconventional Lumiar schools in Brazil, which believe that children learn best when they have a say in what they're learning

Patrick Kingsley

19, Nov, 2012 @9:00 PM

Article image
Children can fall behind as early as nine months

Study of 15,000 children finds significant correlation between performance at nine months and five years

Warwick Mansell

17, Feb, 2010 @12:06 AM

Article image
Two-thirds of British children make music, study finds
Youth Music poll shows a massive rise in music-making among young people – especially among those from lower-income backgrounds

Ben Beaumont-Thomas

31, Jan, 2019 @6:00 AM

Article image
Proposed tests for reception children ‘verging on the immoral’
Teachers are rebelling and companies refusing to tender for a planned assessment of infants in England that many say will crowd out play

Wendy Berliner

16, Jan, 2018 @7:30 AM

Article image
British children 'deeply concerned' about the impact of climate change

Survey reveals 11 to 16-year-olds are worried about how global waming will affect them, as well as children in poorer nations

Damian Carrington

17, Apr, 2013 @5:00 AM

Article image
Poor children a year behind in language skills

Reading to children and taking them to libraries can limit effects of disadvantage, Sutton Trust study shows

Warwick Mansell

15, Feb, 2010 @11:09 AM

Article image
Teaching is on the road to hell – the story of the national curriculum proves it
Teachers have been dragged through endless, mostly mystifying changes since 1988 – and still more are in the pipeline. Will the government stop making a dog’s breakfast of education?

Michele Hanson

12, Feb, 2018 @11:42 AM

Article image
No more national curriculum? What a rosy time for the teaching profession
The prime minister wants teachers to take back the power in our schools – sorry, academies – and do away with the pesky national curriculum, interfering Ofsted and local authority rule. What could possibly go wrong?

Michele Hanson

17, Aug, 2015 @11:56 AM