Commonwealth youth forced to pay thousands or risk 'illegal' status

Young people who came to UK as children apply to university only to discover they have no access to student finance

Escalating Home Office immigration fees are jeopardising the futures of many young people from Commonwealth countries who have lawfully grown up in the UK, putting them at risk of becoming “illegal”, say campaigners.

In the wake of the Windrush scandal, 16-to-24-year-olds have called on Amber Rudd, the home secretary, to “freeze our fees” in a Downing Street protest designed to highlight how lawful young migrants are also under threat from the government’s hostile environment policy

Chanting “We are not a money tree” and wearing “young, gifted and blocked” T-shirts, campaign group Let Us Learn said since 2014 fees to apply for limited leave to remain (LLR) had increased by 238% to £2,033, which must be paid every 30 months. This figure includes an NHS surcharge, which has doubled from £500 to £1,000.

It can require four successful LLR applications over 10 years before people can apply for indefinite leave to remain – a process that, as it stands, will cost £10,521 per individual, without factoring in future fee rises and legal costs.

The sums were well beyond the reach of ordinary families – the same as a deposit for a house for a family of four – and were forcing some parents to prioritise one child over another, campaigners said. Those who could not pay were classed as undocumented, meaning they cannot work or access student finance, and could be denied some secondary healthcare.

Most were shocked to learn of their status only on applying for university. Tanya (not her real name), 22, originally from Nigeria, who came to the UK aged eight, said she applied to study law at university but found she was not entitled to student finance. Her mother, a low-paid carer, managed to scrape together enough for her LLR fees, but not for her sister, 18.

“I feel like I have failed my sister, even though it’s not my fault. Because she is now in this situation. She can’t access student finance. She can’t work. She is basically in limbo,” said Tanya, who has a part-time job to cover her fees.

“My mum and I have just opened an account and we are trying to put in every month to save enough for my sister”.

The way the Home Office kept changing the rules and raising the fees meant there was constant fear and anxiety, she said. “This is ruining people’s lives, it really is. My mother has to take out a loan just for the next application. And it doesn’t end. It’s constant, and it gets too much. I’ve got my part-time job, but that was meant to survive at university. Now I am going to have to use that money to help out my sister. It’s a lot and it’s really ruining lives.”

Fiona Bawdon, of Just For Kids Law, said there were a variety of reasons why these young people found themselves in this situation. They were bright, talented and educated, hoping to make great contributions to the society they had grown up in. They were lawfully here, but their future was in jeopardy if they could not meet the fees, she said. “Nobody wanted that, but it is an unintended consequence of the policy.”

Most Let Us Learn members have been granted LLR, but have to reapply every 30 months. The process involves completing a 60-page application form, and no legal aid for lawyers’ fees is available.

Adebola Lamuye, 22, originally from Nigeria, who arrived in the UK aged eight, said she was “completely shocked” when she discovered that she had to apply for LLR when she applied to university at 18. It took the Home Office 15 months to respond to her application, she said. “In that period I couldn’t work, I couldn’t study. I couldn’t do anything. I just locked myself up in a room. I wanted to go to university but I couldn’t. I didn’t know what to do.”

Now a journalism apprentice, hoping to go to university next year, she said she had to have three years LLR to be eligible for student finance. She and her sister had to beg from family and friends to meet the fees.

Likewise Andrew, 22, originally from Guyana, discovered his situation after being accepted to study law at five of the UK’s top universities. “I was like everyone else I grew up with. I went to school, I enjoyed school, I studied hard to be a lawyer. And then …” He was floored by the shock, he said. “At that point, life was just very, very depressing for myself and my brother.” He said his mother worried constantly about meeting the fees in the future. “This whole situation – it demonises you. You are scared. You believe you are a criminal even though you are not.”

Chrisann Jarrett of Let Us Learn said many of its members were from Commonwealth countries and had come here as young children. “Yet when we turned 18, we found out the government regards us as international students, which means we are charged higher fees than home students and do not qualify for student loans. On top of that we have to pay higher and higher fees to maintain our lawful status, without which we would be denied NHS care and liable to removal from the country we are proud to call home.”

Kamena Dorling, from Coram Children’s Legal Centre, said there were more and more cases of parents having to choose which child to pay for. “They have to make a judgment call over which child is the most urgent,” she said, usually because that child is approaching 18 and will soon be seen as an adult and the “risk of removal” becomes more serious. “It means there is constant uncertainty in terms of that child’s future,” she added.

Dorling also said that in the meantime, the Home Office continued to make a profit out of fees that far exceeded the cost of processing them.

The Home Office said: “We want to reduce the burden on UK taxpayers by making sure that the border, immigration and citizenship system is funded by those who use it.

“Fees are kept under review, and when setting new fee levels, we consider a number of factors including the cost of processing the application, likely benefits of a successful application, and the wider cost of running the border, immigration and citizenship system. The immigration health surcharge is paid by people from outside the European Economic Area who are seeking to live in the UK for six months or more as a contribution to the NHS.

“Those who arrived in the UK before 1973 as part of the Windrush generation who are recognised as having settled status or who are British citizens, are not required to make an application under the immigration rules and are therefore, not subject to application fees or the immigration health surcharge.”

Contributor

Caroline Davies

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Windrush U-turn is welcome, but May's policy was just cruel
Only a few weeks ago, the PM insisted on a harsh line on Commonwealth immigration

Amelia Gentleman

16, Apr, 2018 @6:52 PM

Article image
Windrush scandal: five unanswered questions
From deportation targets to who is to blame for the citizenship crisis, key questions remain

Peter Walker Political correspondent

25, Apr, 2018 @6:45 PM

Article image
Windrush scandal: Albert Thompson still in dark about cancer treatment despite May's promise
Londoner still has not received any appointment date for radiotherapy – or an apology

Amelia Gentleman

19, Apr, 2018 @7:44 PM

Article image
Rudd should consider position over Windrush row, says Abbott
Home secretary is accused of trying to avoid responsibility for saga that has ‘caused so much misery, ruined so many lives’

Jessica Elgot Political correspondent and Matthew Weaver

18, Apr, 2018 @8:27 AM

Article image
UK plan to register EU citizens would be illegal, say MEPs
Britain will have to register ‘everyone or no one’ in Brexit transition, says cross-party group after Amber Rudd outlines plans

Daniel Boffey in Brussels and Lisa O'Carroll

23, Oct, 2017 @6:00 AM

Article image
‘Britain is my home’: how the hostile environment damage has spread
Since the Windrush scandal broke, stories have emerged of people from other Commonwealth countries battling to prove their right to remain in the UK

Jamie Grierson and Sarah Marsh

27, Apr, 2018 @5:06 PM

Article image
How dare ministers try to blame the Windrush fiasco on Home Office staff | Mark Serwotka
It’s shameless of Theresa May and Amber Rudd to try to shift the blame on to people who have a difficult enough job as it is, says Mark Serwotka, general secretary of the Public and Commercial Services Union

Mark Serwotka

24, Apr, 2018 @9:27 AM

Article image
We’re grateful for your Windrush work – but the fight for justice goes on | Letters
Letters: Guy Hewitt, high commissioner for Barbados, thanks Amelia Gentleman for exposing the Windrush scandal, Gideon Ben-Tovim says too many bodies colluded in creating a hostile environment, immigration solicitor Sheona York says it was clear from 2013 that people in the UK lawfully would be affected, and Diane Astin says the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act (Laspo) has much to answer for

Letters

23, Apr, 2018 @3:08 PM

Article image
‘A legacy of contribution’: photo series pays tribute to Windrush generation
Exclusive: Britain Called and We Answered project speaks to members of community for 75th anniversary

Aamna Mohdin Community affairs correspondent

17, Mar, 2023 @9:49 AM

Article image
How the Windrush scandal led to fall of Amber Rudd – timeline
All the key events, from the Guardian breaking the story to the home secretary’s resignation

Nadia Khomami and Goda Naujokaityte

30, Apr, 2018 @3:44 PM