New watchdog tells England's high-rise builders to 'get your act together'

Chief inspector of buildings says he hopes new regime prevents anything like another Grenfell

High-rise builders with poor fire safety records will be targeted by a new watchdog with the power to mount civil and criminal prosecutions, its chief inspector has said in his first interview.

Peter Baker said he was “determined that the new building safety regime prevents anything like the Grenfell tragedy from ever happening again” and he hoped to avoid any repeat of the building safety crisis that has landed hundreds of thousands of leaseholders with huge bills to fix fire safety faults.

He said the regulator would deter builders from “dodging and weaving” safety responsibilities, and he warned firms to “pull their bootstraps up” or risk sanctions.

Almost four years after the Grenfell fire that killed 72 people, Baker is leading a new system of regulation of buildings more than 18 metres or six storeys tall, based on health and safety practices used in high-risk industries such as oil and chemicals. It will give builders, developers and owners “risk ownership” for overall safety rather than the current system of relying on signoff by a building inspector.

It follows a post-Grenfell review of building safety by Dame Judith Hackitt. The Health and Safety Executive will hire 700 staff including fire experts and engineers to vet buildings.

The new national watchdog for England will have to check projects at three key stages: planning approval, start of construction and handover. If it is not satisfied, it can stop works. The system takes control out of the hands of councils. The Grenfell Tower inquiry heard that the local council’s building inspector was overwhelmed with work after cuts, with 130 jobs on at the time of the high-rise project.

The public inquiry has also heard how architects, builders and clients engaged in “a merry-go-round of buck-passing” on safety that allowed highly combustible materials to be used and mistakes to be made in construction.

Baker said the new system would “make it much more difficult for organisations to duck and dive, dodge and weave and use contractual arrangements to pass the buck.”

A parallel inspectorate for construction products is also being set up. There have been revelations at the inquiry that manufacturers gamed testing and certification systems to obtain approvals for dangerous materials.

“A measure of our success will be the absence of these sorts of disasters,” Baker said. “Industry needs to get on with this and anticipate what’s coming. We are not shy of taking enforcement action and we will do that from day one if necessary.”

He said the public had “lost complete confidence in the construction industry’s ability to build safe and good-quality buildings”, and he told the industry: “You need to get your act together.”

He said his intent was to “give residents confidence this new regulatory regime is going to prevent this sort of issue arising again”.

Contributor

Robert Booth Social affairs correspondent

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Five years after Grenfell, are all cladding victims now going to get help?
People in potentially unsafe lower-rise buildings are in line to benefit from £4bn that Michael Gove is to seek from developers

Alexandra Topping

09, Jan, 2022 @5:26 PM

Article image
Grenfell survivors call for urgent ban on combustible building materials
Ministers have banned combustible materials on high-rises but have yet to decide whether to widen ban

Robert Booth Social affairs correspondent

13, Sep, 2021 @1:20 PM

Article image
Wealth within Grenfell borough is irrelevant, inquiry told
Counsel for Kensington and Chelsea tells inquiry tragedy could have happened in any borough

Owen Bowcott

06, Jun, 2018 @6:08 PM

Article image
Grenfell contractor being sued over blocks with similar cladding
Move by Camden council suggests £400m government fund for removing cladding is not enough

Robert Booth Social affairs correspondent

28, Nov, 2019 @1:06 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on the Grenfell Tower inquiry: necessary but not sufficient | Editorial
Editorial: An obsession with deregulation of building fire regulations meant warning signs of looming disaster seem to have been missed on the watch of Conservative ministers

Editorial

20, May, 2018 @5:05 PM

Article image
Ministers complacent over high-rise fire risk, say firefighters
Fire Brigades Union questions government’s claims that resources are sufficient

Robert Booth Social affairs correspondent

20, May, 2019 @11:01 PM

Article image
Grenfell cladding firm denies responsibility for fire spread
Panels were ‘contributing factor’ but windows to blame, Arconic lawyers tell inquiry

Robert Booth

05, Jun, 2018 @5:59 PM

Article image
Outrage as ministers reject post-Grenfell safety plans for disabled people
Personal fire evacuation plans were in public inquiry’s proposals, which ministers had said they would ‘accept in full’

Robert Booth Social affairs correspondent

18, May, 2022 @5:47 PM

Article image
Grenfell survivors accuse government of fire safety ‘Russian roulette’
Ministers have failed to fix hundreds of thousands of dangerous homes in four years since disaster, say campaigners

Robert Booth Social affairs correspondent

14, Jun, 2021 @4:00 AM

Article image
Value of London flats slashed by Grenfell-style cladding
Home in New Capital Quay, Greenwich, worth £50,000 rather than £475,000, owner told

Lisa O'Carroll

16, Apr, 2018 @5:00 AM