Lives lost, poverty, an arms race, rights destroyed … the continuing cost of 9/11

The US has now spent $8 trillion over 20 years in its response to the attacks. But the true price has been more than financial

Successive US administrations since 2001 have spent $8tn – that’s to say $8,000bn or $8 million million – on what George Bush, its progenitor, termed the “global war on terror”. Joe Biden complains that Afghanistan alone cost the US $300m a day for 20 years. These mind-boggling numbers are mere estimates. Their sheer size is hard to comprehend. In any case, it’s absurd to reckon the cost of a worldwide trauma purely in dollars and cents.

So how should a phenomenon that, looked at in the round, is the most epically damaging man-made calamity of recent times be properly measured? The overall cost of the “war on terror” can be gauged in many different ways – in terms of international development, arms spending, environmental impacts, civil and human rights, the rule of law and the balance of power. Yet most striking is the cost expressed in ordinary lives lost and ruined.

Civilians, on whose behalf it was fought, have been the war’s main victims throughout, despite the focus in the US and Britain on the sacrifices of military personnel. The al-Qaida attacks on New York and Washington killed 2,976 blameless people. The toll of innocents grew exponentially from there. In Iraq, according to estimates by Brown University’s Costs of War project, between 184,382 and 207,156 civilians died in direct, war-related violence from 2003 to 2019.

More than 71,000 civilians are estimated to have died in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Poverty, malnutrition, disease and environmental degradation exacerbated by the war killed tens of thousands more. While most victims of violence died at the hands of terrorist groups such as Islamic State (IS) and the Taliban, US drone and airstrikes since 9/11 have killed at least 22,000 civilians, according to the civilian harm monitoring group Airwars.

Civilians continue to die in large numbers in lesser conflicts in fragile regions indirectly related to, yet facilitated by, the “war on terror”. One such is Yemen, where US-backed Saudi and United Arab Emirates’ forces initially attacked Houthi rebels, whom they deemed terrorists, in pursuit of a wider struggle with Iran. Israel often describes Palestinian civilians killed in the occupied West Bank as terrorists. Russia does the same with anti-Assad fighters in Syria, and China with Uyghur Muslims.

Fear, alienation, and polarisation between western and Muslim countries – the so-called clash of civilisations – is a largely unquantifiable measure of the war’s cost. The attempt to extirpate the “original” enemy, al-Qaida, spawned IS and copycat extremist insurgencies from Libya to the southern Philippines. Mozambique, west Africa and the Sahel are the latest ideological battlefields. Far from being doused, the fire spreads.

Instability, plus a heightened post-9/11 propensity to resort to violence and eschew UN or other forms of conflict mediation, is reflected in a separate metric – international arms sales. Global military expenditure fell steadily in the 1990s. Since 2001, it has never stopped rising, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. In 2020, total spending was close to $2tn, almost double the 2001 level.

In environmental terms, too, the “war on terror” is extraordinarily expensive. Engaged in counter-terrorism operations in more than 80 countries, the Pentagon is the world’s biggest institutional consumer of petroleum – and the single largest producer of greenhouse gases. The US footprint, imperial and carbon, is gigantic. And that’s not counting the unceasing destruction of multiple human and natural habitats.

Despite billions spent on nation-building in Afghanistan, the overall global effect of 20 years of warfare on Muslim and particularly Arab countries has been chilling, in terms of associated humanitarian emergencies, missed economic and development opportunities, and personal and political freedoms. In Yemen, to give but one example, almost half a million children under five may die from preventable causes this year. The long-term negative ramifications of this unforgivable, avoidable disaster are unfathomable.

While the spread of violent Islamist fundamentalism before and after 2001 has been disastrous for Muslims, the west’s overly aggressive, ill-considered reaction has also been massively self-destructive – especially the US.

“After a brief burst of rally-round-the-flag patriotism, the war fuelled domestic division, xenophobia and a broader fear of people of colour, thereby reinforcing the white supremacists at the core of Trumpism,” Harvard professor Stephen Walt declared last week. “US officials embraced torture and rendition as policy tools, lied to the country about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction... and no one was ever held accountable.”

Britain’s democracy suffered similar collateral damage. Trust in Tony Blair and politicians generally has arguably never recovered from the deceptions and exaggerations that preceded the Iraq invasion – all in support of Bush’s supposedly morally justified “war on terror”.

Subsequent, vengeful Islamist bomb and suicide attacks in London, Manchester, Paris and many other European cities incited Islamophobia and anti-migrant, anti-foreigner sentiment. That in turn inflamed anti-establishment politics of the type that produced Brexit while empowering anti-democratic authoritarians and rightwing populist-nationalist demagogues everywhere. Additional casualties were the international rule of law, which a divided, discredited UN security council proved incapable of upholding, the “Blair doctrine” of humanitarian intervention, and the unchallenged primacy of the US. “The global war on terrorism was a giant distraction from a host of broader strategic concerns, most notably China’s remarkable rise. It is no exaggeration to say that 9/11 – and especially the US response to it – was an enormous gift to Beijing,” Walt wrote.

While its failures are many and epic, it’s harder to pinpoint clear-cut successes for the continuing “war on terror”. Britain’s MI5 says many plots are foiled. There have been no repeat al-Qaida attacks on US soil. Osama bin Laden is dead. Yet despite Biden’s assurances, this particular “forever war” is far from over.

Ordinary people everywhere continue to pay a calamitous price for a catastrophic response to an atrocious act.

Contributor

Simon Tisdall

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
I watched the bombs fall to unleash the 9/11 wars. Two decades later, they grind on | Jason Burke
Listening to Joe Biden’s words as the US left Afghanistan was to hear echoes of George W Bush from 2001. Is this a crisis destined to repeat itself?

Jason Burke

29, Aug, 2021 @7:00 AM

Article image
The lesson we failed to learn from 9/11: peace is impossible if we don’t talk to our enemies | Jonathan Powell
We should have engaged with the Taliban 20 years ago, but we thought the winner takes all, says Tony Blair’s former chief of staff, Jonathan Powell

Jonathan Powell

10, Sep, 2021 @6:00 AM

Article image
Ayman al-Zawahiri's ambition for al-Qaida | Ed Husain

Ed Husain: Al-Qaida is far from finished, despite Osama bin Laden's death. The US must engage more with Arab countries to defeat Salafis

Ed Husain

21, Jun, 2011 @1:07 PM

Article image
Kabul is only the start: US allies feel the draught as Biden turns his back
Retreat from Afghanistan gives a clear signal of a US shift on counter-terrorism that leaves the rest of the world to fend for itself

Simon Tisdall

29, Aug, 2021 @6:30 AM

Article image
Why is the world at war?
Syria, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Yemen, Afghanistan, Ukraine – the globe is scarred by violence

Jason Burke

04, Mar, 2018 @12:05 AM

Article image
Afghanistan will be seen as Joe Biden’s defeat. And it may come back to haunt him
The American public will not be in a forgiving mood if al-Qaida rises again following US withdrawal and the Taliban advance

Simon Tisdall

15, Aug, 2021 @5:15 AM

Article image
China wants to erase Tibet. Will Britain stay quiet about this crime? | Simon Tisdall
The US has taken a public stand over China’s crimes against humanity. In Beijing this week, the UK foreign secretary should do the same and shame his hosts

Simon Tisdall

27, Aug, 2023 @6:00 AM

Article image
No longer does al-Qaida grab the headlines. That might be the plan | Jason Burke
The death of Osama bin Laden’s son should make us focus on the group’s new modus operandi

Jason Burke

04, Aug, 2019 @6:00 AM

Article image
Afghanistan drone strike targeted Islamic State ‘planner’ in car, US says
US says there were no known civilian casualties but community elder claims women and children among victims

Jason Burke

28, Aug, 2021 @7:03 PM

Article image
US-Taliban talks offer glimmer of hope on path to Afghan peace
Insurgents demonstrate their commitment by naming top commander as chief negotiator

Emma Graham-Harrison

26, Jan, 2019 @6:51 PM