Tulip, Summit, Mound: can urban properties really be ‘experiences’? | India Block

In cities like London and New York, developers are having to draw people back to the areas they priced them out of

What do a fake hill, a giant light-up ball, gondola rides 300 metres in the air, staircases to nowhere, a park perched over a river and a glass elevator stuck on the side of a skyscraper have in common?

They are all part of the experience-ified modern city. The Mound, London’s sad, artificially turfed scaffolding structure, could soon be joined by the Sphere and the Tulip, while New York already has Vessel, Little Island and Summit One Vanderbilt.

Major cities are on a roll, commissioning giant and peculiar structures for the purpose of attracting consumers by providing a unique experience. This trend isn’t so much a stylistic movement as an expression of financial pragmatism. Designers, however starry eyed, are beholden to the interests of their clients.

Take the Mound, commissioned by Westminster council and designed by the Dutch firm MVRDV. The aim was to bring people back to shop on Oxford Street and turn a prime piece of central London land into a paid attraction. The scheme didn’t quite go to plan, and eventually the site had to offer free entry to draw in visitors.

It was the same thinking behind the British designer Thomas Heatherwick’s Vessel, a 46-metre (150 ft)-high viewpoint costing $200m (£144m), built to increase footfall in Manhattan’s Hudson Yards luxury shopping district. Unfortunately, the visible and accessible high place also attracted suicides. The Vessel closed for several months earlier this year after the third death, reopening with a requirement that people have to buddy up in groups of two to enter. In July, a 14-year-old boy died after jumping in front of his family. Now it might close for good.

Just a few blocks away, in midtown Manhattan, the Summit is due to be opened next month by SL Green Realty. The skyscraper promises to draw people straight out of Grand Central station with a vertiginous bar, an infinity mirror room made for selfies, and glass bottomed overhangs. The whole tower cost $3.3bn to build, and ticket prices (the glass elevator ride is separate, of course), have yet to be announced.

The Tulip, which awaits a final planning decision, is perhaps the most bizarre on paper. Raised 305 metres over the City of London on a concrete pole, the bulbous pod – commissioned by the Safra Group, designed by Foster + Partners – will include rides and slides located on the outside of the building. It’s not just land that is now being monetised, it’s the airspace around it.

These buildings first entered our cities in the form of the funfair structures of the millennium: the giant ferris wheel of the Eye and the circus big top of the Dome. Definite articles were added to their names, emphasising the supremacy of the attractions. The financialisation of property that occurred over the following decades caused developers to seek profits by buying and selling land at inflated prices. Caught in a trap of their own making, they were forced to monetise commercial properties in order to make greater returns on increasingly expensive assets. Ironically, they’re having to draw people back to the neighbourhoods they priced them out of.

If the main purpose of these experience-led attractions is to make cash for their developers, it’s unsurprising that they are actively making our cities worse – and not just aesthetically. Little Island, dubbed “the Instagram park”, and also designed by Heatherwick, is a wonderland of trees and plants cupped by concrete columns rising out of the Hudson River. It cost the billionaire Barry Diller $260m to build and, although it is free, you have to reserve a slot in advance. Diller said he paid for round-the-clock security, ostensibly to prevent a repeat of the problems at Vessel.

The joy of impulsivity is gone if you have to pre-register your personal data for a park. Discovery is no longer a welcome accident of wandering when security barriers obstruct your way, and spaces are no longer public if we’re only allowed to walk them under the gaze of security guards.

It doesn’t have to be this way. People don’t want to live in a privatised playground: they want a city that actually inspires them, and which works. And it isn’t sanctimonious to suggest that free public amenities can actually be sexier as attractions. Just see Oodi, Finland’s stonking Helsinki central library, by ALA Architects, or the Nippon Foundation’s Tokyo Toilet Project, where big names such as Tadao Ando and Toyo Ito have designed public loos that light up or go see-through when not in use. Just imagine what Norman Foster could do with a couple of million for a toilet, instead of the Tulip.

  • India Block is deputy editor at Disegno, a quarterly design journal

  • In the UK and Ireland, Samaritans can be contacted on 116 123 or email jo@samaritans.org or jo@samaritans.ie. In the US, the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline is 1-800-273-8255. In Australia, the crisis support service Lifeline is 13 11 14. Other international helplines can be found at www.befrienders.org.

Contributor

India Block

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Sadiq Khan has rejected the Tulip. But that won’t save London’s skyline | Simon Jenkins
The mayor has been as bad as Boris Johnson in bowing down to speculators, says Guardian columnist Simon Jenkins

Simon Jenkins

18, Jul, 2019 @9:00 AM

Article image
The $500m Shed: inside New York's quilted handbag on wheels
This puffed-up cultural citadel was meant to be an endlessly evolving, telescopic arts complex. But the glistening billionaires’ playground rising up beside it had other plans

Oliver Wainwright

05, Apr, 2019 @1:13 PM

Article image
Boris Johnson's abuse of planning power is an assault on democracy
By intervening in the local planning process, the mayor of London is creating a more exclusive, divided city of private enclaves, designed only for the needs of the rich

Oliver Wainwright

29, Jan, 2014 @11:36 AM

Article image
New year's resolutions for architects in 2015
Build better towers, ditch the Lego, outlaw the ‘facadectomy’ – and how about more transparency in Boris’s London?

Oliver Wainwright

31, Dec, 2014 @12:00 PM

Article image
The Tree of Trees jubilee sculpture is yet another mound of ill-judged public art | Rowan Moore
Thomas Heatherwick has been compared to Michelangelo, but this cartoon version of nature is no David

Rowan Moore

30, Apr, 2022 @5:44 PM

Article image
The Competition: a documentary that exposes how 'starchitects' really work
Sleepless nights for interns, tearful tantrums, and structures that resemble fossilised turds. A new documentary exposes the world of iconic architecture at its worst

Oliver Wainwright

08, May, 2014 @10:34 AM

Article image
Don’t let philistine developers wreck our urban heritage | Simon Jenkins
There’s no point having conservation areas if they are not conserved. The government’s ruling on Paddington cube will be pivotal

Simon Jenkins

07, Feb, 2017 @5:09 PM

Article image
I've seen the future and it's Norwich: the energy-saving, social housing revolution
The 100 homes on Goldsmith Street aren’t just smart and modern. They may be the most energy-efficient houses ever built in the UK. Could this be the start of proper social housing?

Oliver Wainwright

16, Jul, 2019 @4:30 PM

Article image
The ‘sky pool’ is just the start: London prepares for a flood of bathing oligarchs
From an all-glass swimming bridge to ‘the highest residential pool in London’, developers are vying for the fanciest pools to flog their projects to overseas investors

Oliver Wainwright

20, Aug, 2015 @4:10 PM

Article image
The Liverpool locals who took control of their long-neglected streets
Granby Four Streets in Toxteth is a rare success after New Labour initiatives drained the area of life

Oliver Wainwright

27, Nov, 2014 @5:41 PM