For eight years, Australia has been taking refugees as hostages. It’s time to ask: who has benefited? | Behrouz Boochani

The government needs our bodies for political power, while the detention industry needs us to fuel its money-making torture machine. But what has Australia truly gained?

Eight years have passed since the Australian government mandated offshore detention for all asylum seekers who arrive by boat, which led to the banishing of more than 3,000 refugees to Nauru as well as Manus Island in Papua New Guinea.

Since then, we have heard many tragic stories about the stranded refugees – stories of death, violence, child detention, family separation and countless violations of human rights.

We have heard the stories of the hundreds who have been traumatised and the 14 who were killed. We got to know about Reza Barati who was surrounded by a group of guards and beaten to death. We were told about Hamid Khazaei who developed a leg infection, ended up in a wheelchair and died while in custody. Faysal Ishak Ahmed also died in a Brisbane hospital.

When I think about the stories of these refugees, including myself, the first thought that springs to mind is the abduction of human beings on the sea. We were kidnapped and forcibly transferred to an island we had never heard of. We were robbed of our identity. We turned into a string of numbers through a carefully planned process of dehumanisation. We were led into an evil system which was designed to diminish our identity.

The offshore detention policy was a form of official hostage-taking. For years, the Australian government refused to accept us, while preventing us from being transferred elsewhere. Even when it succumbed to public pressure by signing a resettlement deal with the United States, the government prolongated the transfer process. After all these years, many refugees are still held in indefinite detention.

In addition to being a form of official hostage-taking, the policy provided a platform for the spread of populist ideas and false claims. Kevin Rudd, for example, announced this policy just before the 2013 federal election, while Scott Morrison went to the Christmas Island detention centre alongside a dozen reporters in 2019 and posed heroically against the backdrop of the sea.

They deceived the public into believing that the offshore detention policy was like a building that would collapse if one brick were to be removed from it. They warned against the invasion of boats on Australian shores, but no boats arrived. What boats anyway? They returned every single one to Indonesia.

This is a key point, because whenever the public has put pressure on the government since 2013, officials have highlighted the risks of opening up the borders. This turned out to be an outright lie. What the government has done is create unjustified fear while hiding behind the notion of national security.

The reality is they needed our bodies for retaining their political power. Along the way, they created a $12bn detention industry which has greatly benefited politicians as well as certain security and medical companies. The contracts signed with Paladin is the only instance leaked to the media, but I believe that is just the tip of the iceberg.

The Australian government has made every effort to preserve its detention industry. When thousands of refugees were transferred to the US, the government brought in a group of New Zealanders previously held in Australia. At the end of the day, human bodies are fuel to this money-making torture machine.

The offshore detention policy is a combination of hostage-taking, deception, secrecy, corruption, populist propaganda, and of course, systematic torture. It is sadistic, costly, and unnecessary. After all these years, Australians need to find the courage to look in the mirror and ask themselves, “What have we gained? What have we lost?” These are crucial questions.

It is time to challenge the foundations of this deceitful policy. In the last eight years, human values have been undermined, more than $12bn has been spent and the international reputation of Australia has suffered immensely. The key question to ask right now is: “Who has benefited from this policy?”

• Written by Behrouz Boochani, adjunct senior fellow at University of Canterbury

• Translated by Mohsen Kafi, a PhD candidate in literary translation studies at Victoria University of Wellington

Contributor

Behrouz Boochani

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Malcolm Turnbull, why didn't you answer my question on Q&A about Manus Island? | Behrouz Boochani
Conditions on Manus Island have become more militarised and difficult in the two months since the supreme court ruled the detention centre illegal. I now ask the Australian people to say no to cruelty – to choose love over inhumanity

Behrouz Boochani

21, Jun, 2016 @1:53 AM

Article image
The pattern is clear: Australia’s next election will be a competition on cruelty | Behrouz Boochani
Since the Tampa affair, humanitarian issues have been used to manipulate the public. The refugees still exiled in Papua New Guinea will suffer the consequences

Behrouz Boochani

11, Oct, 2021 @1:37 AM

Article image
We pretend there has been change under Labor but hundreds of refugees are still in detention | Behrouz Boochani
After taking happy snaps in Biloela the new government has made no effort to change Australia’s cruel immigration policy on refugees arriving by boat

Behrouz Boochani

27, Jul, 2022 @3:00 AM

Article image
Australian immigration detention costs double that of US and Europe – report
Australia pays US$459 for each day a person is kept in detention, compared with $224 in the US and just $134 in Canada and Austria

Ben Doherty and Nick Evershed

01, Oct, 2015 @7:15 AM

Article image
The price of 'stopping the boats': abusing asylum-seekers and shaming our country | Mark Isaacs
In a new chapter of his updated book, a former Salvation Army worker inside the offshore detention centre on Nauru argues that the hardline stand on refugees is morally and practically flawed

Mark Isaacs

27, Dec, 2016 @1:34 AM

Article image
Where does the Coalition's re-election leave refugees on Manus and Nauru?
Labor’s promise to resettle some refugees in New Zealand had been a source of hope, now they fear languishing indefinitely

Michael McGowan

30, May, 2019 @10:08 PM

Article image
Australia should bring Manus and Nauru refugees to immediate safety, UN says
UN human rights committee says mandatory detention policy is unlawful and Australia cannot ‘pick and choose’ which international laws it follows

Ben Doherty

09, Nov, 2017 @11:13 PM

Article image
We paid $180m for Scott Morrison to have a press conference on Christmas Island | Scott Ludlam
The blunder could be the most politically costly press conference ever

Scott Ludlam

03, Apr, 2019 @4:16 AM

Article image
Tragedy on Nauru: we do not need to act like a stupid and brutal nation | Sarah Mares
The growing trauma surrounding our toxic detention system not only affects those who witness horrific events, but it takes a terrible toll on all of us

Sarah Mares

03, May, 2016 @12:47 AM

Article image
Faysal Ishak Ahmed's life was full of pain. Australia had a duty to protect him | Behrouz Boochani
Born in Sudan, Faysal Ahmed had spent more than half his life in refugee camps. Iranian refugee Behrouz Boochani speaks to Faysal’s friend about his illness and the life that led him to Australian detention in Manus Island

Behrouz Boochani

29, Dec, 2016 @11:02 PM