Doctors develop 'transformational' new DNA test for Down's syndrome

New test more accurate than current screening in detecting Down’s, Edwards and Patau syndromes and could simplify screening process, say researchers

Doctors have developed a more accurate test for Down’s syndrome and two rarer genetic disorders that are so serious the children often die soon after birth.

UK hospitals that adopted the test as part of a medical project found that it picked up nearly all affected pregnancies and slashed the number of women who wrongly tested positive, sparing them the anxiety of needless follow-up tests.

Five NHS maternity units used “reflex DNA screening” between April 2015 and August 2016, during which nearly 23,000 pregnancies were checked for Down’s, Edwards and Patau syndromes. All of the conditions are caused by the presence of an extra chromosome in the baby’s cells.

According to a report in Genetics in Medicine, the new procedure detected 101 of 106 pregnancies affected by the disorders, or 95%, compared with 81% for the conventional test used in hospitals. The rate of false positives, where babies were wrongly identified as having a condition, fell 100-fold with reflex DNA screening to two in 10,000. Compared with regular screening, the new procedure avoided 530 invasive tests to diagnose the disorders.

The conventional screening test for Down’s and other chromosomal disorders involves a blood test and an ultrasound scan at 10 to 14 weeks, which are combined with the mother’s age to work out her risk of carrying an affected baby. If the risk is more than one in 150, the woman is offered an invasive test to confirm the diagnosis. The diagnostic tests require a needle to be inserted into the woman’s womb to collect fluid around the foetus or tissue from the placenta.

Reflex DNA screening draws on the same blood and ultrasound tests, but if the risk of an affected pregnancy is higher than one in 800, then some of the blood already taken from the mother is sent for DNA analysis. This looks for fragments of DNA that have leaked from the placenta, which reveal whether the baby has the extra chromosomes. The woman is only alerted to the risk if the DNA tests positive.

The NHS plans to introduce a similar screening procedure in 2018, that will be offered to about 10,000 women a year who are considered to have a higher risk of giving birth to a baby with one of the conditions.

Nicholas Wald at the Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine at Queen Mary, said reflex DNA screening had substantial benefits for women who are screened. “We don’t have to approach women to come back for a DNA test. This enormously reduces the false positive rate and the number of women needlessly made anxious as a result.”

Wald said the procedure simplified the screening process and freed up clinic time because far fewer women had to be called back for follow-up tests. “This would potentially be offered to all pregnant women,” he added.

Joseph Aquilina, a consultant obstetrician at Barts Health NHS Trust, one of the five units that tried reflex DNA screening, said it was “transformational”. “Not only is the screening method better than current practice, but I have more time to devote to other clinical needs, as do the nursing and midwifery staff involved,” he said.

The doctors are now talking to other hospitals to see if they want to adopt the procedure. The five units that took part in the project are Barts Health NHS Trust, The Royal London, Whipps Cross and Newham, Kingston, and Liverpool Women’s Hospital.

Contributor

Ian Sample Science editor

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Simple blood test for Down's syndrome is on its way, say scientists

Announcement made by researchers looking to replace current risky procedure that causes 1% of women tested to miscarry

Ian Sample, science correspondent

06, Mar, 2011 @6:00 PM

Article image
Online IVF calculator will predict chances of fertility treatment success

Web resource based on five years of medical records aims to tell women their likelihood of giving birth with 99% accuracy

Sarah Boseley, health editor

05, Jan, 2011 @12:01 AM

Researchers devise safer Down's syndrome test

If successful it would eliminate the small risk to the foetus posed by invasive testing methods

David Pallister

06, Oct, 2008 @11:01 PM

Article image
Doctors edge closer to creating babies with DNA from three people
Studies on embryos made with extra DNA showed majority were indistinguishable from standard IVF embryos

Ian Sample Science editor

08, Jun, 2016 @5:10 PM

Article image
NHS to offer safer Down's syndrome test to pregnant women
Non-invasive prenatal test allows screening without risk of miscarriage but critics fear it could lead to an increase in terminations

Sarah Boseley Health editor

28, Oct, 2016 @11:01 PM

Article image
Down's syndrome test could see condition disappear, C of E warns
Church says new NHS test could lead to more terminations and fewer people born with condition

Harriet Sherwood Religion correspondent

19, Jan, 2018 @2:28 PM

Bad science: How BBC misread the evidence on Down's syndrome

Ben Goldacre: Newspapers quote Radio 4 documentary presented by Felicity Finch whose founding premise was wrong

Ben Goldacre

29, Nov, 2008 @12:01 AM

Article image
Down's syndrome cells 'fixed' in first step towards chromosome therapy

Researchers shut down the extra chromosome responsible for Down's syndrome, paving the way for future treatments

Ian Sample, science correspondent

17, Jul, 2013 @5:00 PM

Article image
New IVF test increases pregnancy chances, say researchers

Technique for screening embryos for genetic defects during treatment doubles chances that one will implant in womb

James Randerson, science correspondent

10, Nov, 2008 @12:01 AM

Article image
UK doctors select first women to have ‘three-person babies’
Two women carrying mutations that cause rare genetic disease to undergo radical therapy

Ian Sample Science editor

01, Feb, 2018 @6:48 PM