Evaluating the true purpose of universities | Letters

In scrapping university targets, this government will reverse progress and limit access to higher education for working-class students, writes Gary Nethercott, while Rhona Jamieson tackles the education secretary’s assumptions about the value of a degree

Laura McInerney is correct when she takes aim at this mendacious government for its attempts to limit access to university education for all (Cuts to university targets in England are insulting to working-class people like me, 21 July).

In 1973, I was fortunate to attend university from a working-class comprehensive at a time when, according to Hansard, 5.57% of the population attended university.

My university was dominated by independent and grammar school students bathing in their privileged access. How wonderful it was that a Labour government some years later opened up university so there was greater access to opportunity, benefitting individual students as well as society.

To now try to crash the gears into reverse is an act of vandalism. It is quite simple: when I see the parents of independent, fee-paying schools equally happy for their children to embark on vocational courses instead of attending university, I will know that there is equal access to opportunity. Until then, we need to defend the right of working-class children to experience the life-changing opportunities that a university education can offer. Why would any credible government wish to deny this?
Gary Nethercott
Woodbridge, Suffolk

• There are some underlying assumptions of Gavin Williamson’s recent announcement on higher education (English universities must prove ‘commitment’ to free speech for bailouts, 16 July). First, that the only purpose of universities is to create wealth; second, that courses should be judged solely on graduate earnings (not taking into account, for example, the income difference generated by private/public sector routes); and third, that universities are “providers” that operate as businesses.

It may well be the case that we have too many universities and courses, and we certainly need to be increasing funding for further education, but Williamson will find that nursing courses come rather low in his rankings. Perhaps he thinks that nurses are of low value to society.

Maybe we should be alarmed that the minister in charge of our universities, and the truly world-class research they produce, is a man with a BSc in social sciences.
Rhona Jamieson
Kibworth, Leicestershire

Letters

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Myths around further education policy and student targets | Letters
Letters: David Blunkett reacts to Gavin Williamson’s comments about graduates in non-graduate jobs. Philip Knowles points out that the target was for 50% of young people to go into higher education, not just university

Letters

10, Jul, 2020 @3:35 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on universities: test, trace and teach | Editorial
Editorial: Terms have barely begun and already students are locked down. They, and their lecturers, deserve better

Editorial

28, Sep, 2020 @5:42 PM

Article image
Universities in England favour cancel culture over quality, says Williamson
Education secretary tells vice-chancellors they risk undermining public confidence in higher education

Richard Adams Education editor

09, Sep, 2021 @2:43 PM

Article image
Universities are a vital public asset. We must save them | Letters
Letters: Prof Des Freedman, Michael Bassey, John Sommer and Sally Bates respond to an article about the dire state of Britain’s higher education institutions

04, Apr, 2024 @5:11 PM

Article image
Universities have let their students down | Letters
Letters: Current difficulties were predictable and avoidable, writes one academic, while Maria Gajewska wonders when a fee refund might be due. Meanwhile, William Proctor believes it is the government, not institutions, that bears responsibility for the crisis

Letters

04, Oct, 2020 @5:27 PM

Article image
What’s the real worth of ‘low-value’ degrees? | Letters
Letters: Siân Lawrence, Julian Preece, Chris Townsend, Ann Lynch and Richard Mountford on Rishi Sunak’s plan to cap student numbers for some university courses

19, Jul, 2023 @5:30 PM

Article image
Fresh ideas in education blocked by stale thinking | Letters
Letters: Innovations in classroom practice have been continually hampered by a government that prefers to maintain the status quo, writes Kevin Donovan. Plus letters from Kathryn Riley, and Martin Large and Anna Dusseau

Letters

08, Jan, 2021 @3:49 PM

Article image
English universities must prove 'commitment' to free speech for bailouts
Gavin Williamson says institutions hit by Covid-19 should close courses with low graduate pay

Richard Adams Education editor

16, Jul, 2020 @6:23 PM

Article image
Let’s have perspective in tuition fees debate | Letters
Letters: Guardian readers respond to Danny Dorling’s tuition fees plan for Labour

Letters

05, Nov, 2018 @6:20 PM

Article image
Social mobility and improving access to Britain’s universities | Letters
Letters: Readers suggest ways of making tertiary education better value for money and more open to working-class, ethnic-minority and mature students

Letters

21, Aug, 2017 @4:29 PM