Most plastic will never be recycled – and the manufacturers couldn’t care less | Arwa Mahdawi

Oil and gas companies make far more money churning out new plastic than reusing old. Meanwhile, the public gets the blame

Plastic recycling is a scam. You diligently sort your rubbish, you dutifully wash your plastic containers, then everything gets tossed in a landfill or thrown in the ocean anyway. OK, maybe not everything – but the vast majority of it. According to one analysis, only 9% of all plastic ever made has likely been recycled. Here’s the kicker: the companies making all that plastic have spent millions on advertising campaigns lecturing us about recycling while knowing full well that most plastic will never be recycled.

A new investigation by National Public Radio (NPR) and the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) reports that the large oil and gas companies that manufacture plastics have known for decades that recycling plastic was unlikely to ever happen on a broad scale because of the high costs involved. “They were not interested in putting any real money or effort into recycling because they wanted to sell virgin material,” Larry Thomas, former president of one of the plastic industry’s most powerful trade groups, told NPR. There is a lot more money to be made in selling new plastic than reusing the old stuff. But, in order to keep selling new plastic, the industry had to clean up its wasteful image. “If the public thinks that recycling is working, then they are not going to be as concerned about the environment,” Thomas noted. And so a huge amount of resources were diverted into intricate “sustainability theatre”.

Multinationals misleading people for profit? Hold the front page! While the plastics industry’s greenwashing will come as no surprise to anyone, the extent of the deception alleged in NPR’s investigation is truly shocking. (I should state for the record that an industry representative interviewed by NPR contested the idea that the public was intentionally misled, although he does “understand the scepticism”.)

The subterfuge around recycling plastic is also an important reminder of just how cynically and successfully big companies have shifted the burden of combating the climate crisis on to individuals. This might be best encapsulated in a famous ad campaign that aired in the US during the 1970s with the slogan “People Start Pollution. People can stop it.” The campaign was created by a non-profit group called Keep America Beautiful, which happened to be heavily funded by beverage and packaging companies with a vested interest in convincing people that they were the ones to blame for a polluted planet, not capitalism.

Perhaps one of the most effective bits of propaganda that big business has come up with to shift the burden of combating the climate crisis on to individuals is the idea of the “carbon footprint”. BP popularised the term in the early noughties, in what has been called one of the most “successful, deceptive PR campaigns maybe ever”. While oil companies were telling us to fret about our carbon usage they were doing whatever the hell they liked: 20 fossil fuel companies can be directly linked to more than one-third of all greenhouse gas emissions, an analysis by leading climate researchers found last year. Chevron, Exxon, BP and Shell are behind more than 10% of the world’s climate emissions since 1965 – but we have been successfully convinced that people start pollution and people can stop it. That if we just fly less and recycle more the planet will be OK. To some degree that is right: there must be a level of personal responsibility when it comes to the climate emergency. We all have to do our part. But individual action is a tiny drop in a heavily polluted ocean; we need systemic change to make a real difference. And, more than anything, we need to change what we value. What frustrates me most about BP’s “carbon footprint” propaganda is how clever it is. There is so much human ingenuity in the world, but it is all directed towards the wrong things.

• Arwa Mahdawi is a Guardian columnist

Contributor

Arwa Mahdawi

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Just 90 companies caused two-thirds of man-made global warming emissions

Chevron, Exxon and BP among companies most responsible for climate change since dawn of industrial age, figures show

Suzanne Goldenberg, US environment correspondent

20, Nov, 2013 @4:07 PM

Article image
Why cheap oil is the key to beating climate change | Mitchell Anderson
Keeping the price of a barrel of crude at $75 or less will devastate the profitability of fossil fuel extraction – as the shelving of three tar sands projects demonstrates

Mitchell Anderson

11, Dec, 2015 @4:59 PM

Article image
Revealed: the 20 firms behind a third of all carbon emissions
New data shows how fossil fuel companies have driven climate crisis despite industry knowing dangers

Matthew Taylor and Jonathan Watts

09, Oct, 2019 @11:00 AM

Article image
US government department criticised for failing to collect oil revenues
Interior department, investigating polar bear studies, accused of failures that could have cost government billions in uncollected royalties

Suzanne Goldenberg, US environment correspondent

02, Aug, 2011 @7:05 PM

Article image
There are three options in tackling climate change. Only one will work | Mayer Hillman
We’re now at a fork in the road: either we cut out fossil fuels completely, or we pass on a dying planet to our children, says social scientist Mayer Hillman

Mayer Hillman

30, Oct, 2018 @2:58 PM

Article image
In court, Big Oil rejected climate denial | Dana Nuccitelli
Dana Nuccitelli: If even oil companies accept human-caused global warming, why doesn’t everybody?

Dana Nuccitelli

23, Mar, 2018 @10:00 AM

Article image
Shell and Exxon's secret 1980s climate change warnings | Benjamin Franta
Benjamin Franta: Newly found documents from the 1980s show that fossil fuel companies privately predicted the global damage that would be caused by their products.

Benjamin Franta

19, Sep, 2018 @10:00 AM

Article image
Global warming could cut number of Arctic hurricanes, study finds

Research says storms that hamper the exploitation of Arctic reserves may halve by 2100, but experts warn against oil rush

Shanta Barley

16, Sep, 2010 @10:33 AM

Article image
The Guardian view on the economic and environmental impact of falling oil prices | Editorial
Editorial: The economic implications of the tumbling cost of crude are momentous but mixed. For the environment, though, it should at least mean that more fossil fuels stay in the ground

Editorial

13, Jan, 2016 @7:50 PM

Article image
Shell creates green energy division to invest in wind power
Insiders say oil firm’s New Energies renewables arm could grow very big, but not for a decade or more

Terry Macalister Energy editor

15, May, 2016 @3:08 PM