Putin’s timeline for storing tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus is hard to believe

Although Alexander Lukashenko has agreed to host nuclear bases little construction work seems to have started

Like a lot of what Vladimir Putin says about nuclear weapons, his suggestion that Russia would start storing its bombs in Belarus may add up to less than it appears.

In February last year, Putin said he was putting Russia’s nuclear arsenal on high alert, but there was no perceptible change in the country’s nuclear posture, or any unusual movements of its weapons.

Putin and the leader of Belarus, Alexander Lukashenko, have been hinting at some kind of nuclear basing arrangement for some time. Over a year ago, the Belarus leader staged a referendum to change the constitution to allow for that.

What Putin is threatening this time is to take another couple of steps along that road, starting the training of Belarus aircrews in early April to pilot aircraft carrying nuclear bombs, and to finish storage facilities for tactical nuclear weapons by 1 July.

Nuclear experts are sceptical of such ambitious timelines, and point out that Russia has been working on a nuclear weapon storage facility in Kaliningrad for at least seven years and it is still not clear whether the bombs have actually arrived there.

So far, no satellite imagery has surfaced that might suggest something similar is being built in Belarus.

“I’ve looked around at some of the likely bases and I don’t see anything that indicates construction of a nuclear storage site,” said Hans Kristensen, director of the nuclear information project at the Federation of American Scientists. “But you can’t rule it out. You can bet a lot of people are combing over the country right now.”

Putin had suggested a nuclear announcement was on the way earlier in the week, saying Russia would respond to Britain’s decision to supply armour-piercing shells to Ukraine made of depleted uranium.

Such shells are toxic enough to require special handling and pose an environmental threat, but they are by no means nuclear weapons. In his remarks on Saturday, Putin did not dwell on the issue and attributed any such linkage to Lukashenko.

Instead, he focused on a longstanding gripe of Moscow’s about the US nuclear-sharing arrangements with five of its allies: Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, Italy and Turkey. Under that arrangement, the US stores B61 gravity bombs (about 100 in all) in those countries and their aircrews are trained to fly planes carrying them in the event of nuclear war.

Russia argues this is a violation of the 1968 nuclear non-proliferation treaty (NPT) and just last week, Putin’s joint statement with Xi Jinping said: “All nuclear-weapon states should refrain from deploying nuclear weapons abroad and withdraw nuclear weapons deployed abroad.”

Putin’s announcement about Belarus suggests he has changed his mind about that principle since Tuesday. However, he can expect the global backlash to be muted due to widely shared impatience over many years with the US-Nato sharing arrangements.

Those arrangements are not technically in violation of the NPT as they predated the treaty. The Soviet Union accepted them and at the time, Moscow could deploy its nuclear weapons in Belarus or any other of its republics. But when Belarus, Ukraine and the republics became independent, it lost that right.

The US sharing deal with its allies, and the proposed Russian arrangement with Belarus, also get around NPT restrictions by not formally transferring the stored weapons to the host government until a war begins. For non-weapon states and arms control advocates, however, that is a cynical dodge and against the spirit of the NPT.

The Obama administration contemplated withdrawal of the B61s from Europe as a move towards disarmament, but some European allies resisted any move that might suggest the nuclear umbrella was getting thinner, and then relations with Moscow worsened again. Rather than being removed, the bombs were modernised, and the new version, the B61-12, is in the process of being transferred to Europe.

“The new bombs are a whole new wave of weapons coming in and that’s of grave concern to European populations,” said Susi Snyder, the programme coordinator of the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons.

“Putin calling this out and threatening to do the same thing is putting a spotlight on a problem that has existed for quite some time and that the rest of the world has also been trying to draw attention to and remedy.”

Kristensen argued, however, that Putin has in large part himself to blame for the continued presence of B61s in Europe, through his seizure of Crimea and eastern Ukraine in 2014.

He said: “There’s no doubt in my mind that if Putin had not started what he’s doing there in 2014, it’s very likely that the nuclear weapons would have been withdrawn by now.”


Julian Borger in Washington

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Putin’s mission to Minsk raises fears he will drag Belarus into Ukraine war
Putin and Lukashenko announce more joint manouevres as Kyiv warns of potential new invasion from north

Pjotr Sauer

19, Dec, 2022 @2:36 PM

Article image
Russia moving nuclear warheads to Belarus, says dictator Lukashenko
Countries signed pact that provides for Moscow to deploy weapons in Belarus

Andrew Roth Moscow correspondent

25, May, 2023 @5:22 PM

Article image
Russia accused of taking Belarus ‘nuclear hostage’ with deal to station missiles there
Ukraine says Putin’s deal to station tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus destabilises neighbour

Dan Sabbagh in Kyiv Sam Jones and Julian Borger in Washington

26, Mar, 2023 @2:14 PM

Article image
Belarus leader expected to join Putin for strategic nuclear drills
Alexander Lukashenko to join Russian leader for exercises at which ballistic and cruise missiles will be launched

Andrew Roth in Moscow

18, Feb, 2022 @2:47 PM

Article image
Belarus protesters defy crackdown to march again through Minsk
Calls grow for Lukashenko to step down as president promises tough response

Shaun Walker Central and eastern Europe correspondent

30, Aug, 2020 @4:11 PM

Article image
Merkel appeals to Putin to intervene in Belarus border crisis
Call comes after Polish PM said Russia was behind flow of people from Middle East to EU borders

Andrew Roth in Moscow

10, Nov, 2021 @6:05 PM

Article image
Belarus opposition leader to ask Merkel about upping pressure on Lukashenko
Svetlana Tikhanovskaya says in interview that people can no longer live under dictatorship, as more 100,000 protest on Sunday

Shaun Walker in Moscow

05, Oct, 2020 @3:30 AM

Article image
Belarus: 100,000 join rally against Lukashenko on eve of Putin showdown
Protesters hold placards criticising Russian support as they march on president’s Minsk residence

Luke Harding and agencies

13, Sep, 2020 @5:33 PM

Article image
Zelenskiy asks G7 for monitoring of Ukraine’s border with Belarus
Ukrainian president also asks for more air defence systems after new wave of Russian missile strikes

Peter Beaumont in Kyiv and Julian Borger in Washington

11, Oct, 2022 @5:36 PM

Article image
Belarus says detained Russian mercenaries were plotting terror attack
President Lukashenko accuses Russia of interference in country’s imminent elections

Andrew Roth in Moscow

30, Jul, 2020 @11:23 AM