Canada supreme court rules life without chance of parole is ‘cruel’ and illegal

Decision setting parole eligibility at 25 years could give hope to at least 18 mass killers serving multiple life sentences

Canada’s supreme court has ruled that life sentences without the chance of parole are both “cruel” and unconstitutional, in a landmark decision that could give more than dozen mass killers who committed “inherently despicable acts” the faint hope of release in the future.

The court unanimously determined on Friday that sentencing killers to lengthy prison terms with little hope of freedom risked bringing the “administration of justice into disrepute”.

The closely watched case centred on the fate of Alexandre Bissonnette, the gunman who killed six worshippers at a mosque in Québec City in 2017, but the court’s decision will possibly have consequences for at least 18 others who are serving multiple life sentences.

In Canada, those serving a life sentence for first-degree murder are eligible to apply for parole at 25 years. But in 2011, the Conservative government gave justices the ability to hand out consecutive sentences, rather than concurrent blocks of 25 years.

In the case of Bissonnette, the 27-year-old pleaded guilty to six counts of first-degree murder and six counts of attempted murder in 2018, after he entered the Islamic Cultural Centre in Québec City with a semi-automatic rifle and pistol, opening fire on worshippers. The prime minister, Justin Trudeau, called the act a “terrorist attack”.

Drawing on the 2011 provision, Crown prosecutors asked a judge to impose a parole ineligibility period of 150 years, the harshest sentence ever handed down in Canada since the abolition of the death penalty. Prosecutors said Bissonnette should serve 25 consecutive years for each of the six people he murdered.

The sentencing judge instead ruled Bissonnette would have the chance of parole at 40 years. That decision was overturned in 2020 by Quebec’s court of appeal, which ruled unanimously that Bissonnette should have a chance of parole at 25 years.

Bissonnette, now 32, will be eligible to apply for parole in his 50s.

The ruling of the court applies retroactively to 2011 and could affect at least 18 others whose parole eligibility exceeds 25 years, even those who have exhausted their appeals. In some cases, people have been handed a 75-year wait period before being able to apply for parole.

Friday’s ruling will also affect Alek Minassian, the man who killed 10 people Toronto in 2018 when he ploughed a rental van on to a crowded sidewalk. The judge overseeing his case has held off sentencing him ahead of the supreme court decision, but will now be obliged to set his chance of parole at 25 years.

Acknowledging the heinous crimes of those serving multiple life sentences, Chief Justice Richard Wagner wrote that the ruling “must not be seen as devaluing the life” of innocent victims.

“This appeal is not about the value of each human life, but rather about the limits on the state’s power to punish offenders, which, in a society founded on the rule of law, must be exercised in a manner consistent with the Constitution.”

Contributor

Leyland Cecco in Toronto

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Canada: Hurricane Dorian's sting in the tail leaves 500,000 without power
Post-tropical storm lashes Maritime provinces, with high winds and torrential rains cut power and cellphone service

Leyland Cecco in Toronto

09, Sep, 2019 @3:44 PM

Article image
Canada judge suspended for wearing Trump hat in court
Justice Zabel, who describes his actions as an ‘ill-considered, ill-thought out’ attempt at humour, suspended for 30 days after an unprecedented number of complaints

Ashifa Kassam in Toronto

12, Sep, 2017 @7:22 PM

Article image
Former homeless man's £38,500 fines quashed by court in Canada
Gerry Williams was issued with 450 fines over course of nine years on streets for non-criminal offences such as loitering

Ashifa Kassam in Toronto

06, Oct, 2016 @9:00 AM

Article image
Trudeau nominates first judge of colour to Canada’s supreme court
Mahmud Jamal has been judge on Ontario’s court of appeal since 2019 and will replace Justice Rosalie Abella

Guardian staff and agencies

17, Jun, 2021 @7:56 PM

Article image
Canada judge who wore Trump hat to court faces disciplinary hearing
Ontario court justice Bernd Zabel, who wore a ‘Make America Great Again’ cap following the US election, could be removed from bench after flood of complaints

Ashifa Kassam in Toronto

21, Apr, 2017 @8:30 AM

Article image
Canada Day bomb plot couple freed after judge rules police entrapped them
In a landmark decision, supreme court justice throws out guilty verdict for John Nuttall and Amanda Korody, calling the plot a ‘police-manufactured crime’

Ashifa Kassam in Toronto

29, Jul, 2016 @10:24 PM

Article image
US immigrants make sub-zero trek for slim chance at asylum in Canada
More than 1,000 asylum seekers have journeyed on foot through snow and icy river to cross border in remote areas unregulated by pact that bars refugee claims

Ashifa Kassam in Toronto

23, Mar, 2017 @9:00 AM

Article image
China-US feud threatens Canada as Huawei executive due in court
Meng Wanzhou, Huawei’s global chief financial officer, will appear at a bail hearing on Friday morning, following her arrest last Saturday

Leyland Cecco in Toronto

07, Dec, 2018 @8:00 AM

Article image
‘An indescribable moment’: Indigenous nation in US has right to lands in Canada, court rules
Canada’s supreme court decision on the Sinixt people could affirm hunting rights for tens of thousands

Leyland Cecco in Toronto

25, Apr, 2021 @10:00 AM

Article image
Tiny Canada town defeats oil firm in court fight over drinking water
Company sued Quebec township of 157 people after it created a no-drill zone, fearing for its water supply

Ashifa Kassam in Toronto

03, Mar, 2018 @11:30 AM