Russia and western values: how the east was lost to capitalist opportunism | Letters

Michael Meadowcroft on the west’s mistakes after the collapse of the Soviet Union and Anthony Matthew on why proposing a Nuremberg-style tribunal for Vladimir Putin is a bad idea. Plus letters from Tony Wild and Oscar Clarke

Readers should applaud Aditya Chakrabortty’s article (Western values? They enthroned the monster who is shelling Ukrainians today, 17 March). The west’s failure to back Mikhail Gorbachev’s reforms and advocacy of reality led to the cataclysmic implosion of the Soviet Union and prevented the more gradual constitutional changes that would have provided stability.

The US, supported by the UK government, rushed to push open the door into Russia and other Soviet republics to enable capitalists to feast on the Russian economy, and particularly its natural resources, when what was needed was a kind of Marshall plan to underpin the rouble and to assist the development of civil society.

The consequences of that failure were apparent as early as 1990, when I was being asked in Moscow to advise on the immediate setting up of companies to make hay while the sun shone. It was even more apparent in 1996, when the oligarchs showed great disdain for the presidential election taking place that year. They told me that to them the result was irrelevant, such was their financial influence.

This capitalist opportunism led to the collapse of the rouble in 1998, causing even more poverty among the Russian people. With Boris Yeltsin unable to stabilise the country, they inevitably looked for a strong nationalist leader. Ready in the wings was Vladimir Putin, and the rest is the sad history that has culminated in today’s Ukrainian horror.

It is vital that we separate Putin and his regime from the Russian people, who rightly have a great pride in their cultural heritage. The west needs to understand and to respect that heritage, and to make it clear that our future relationship after Putin can be very different.
Michael Meadowcroft

• Gordon Brown and John Major have called for a Nuremberg-style tribunal to try Vladimir Putin and his associates for war crimes in Ukraine (19 March). The accused are not going to appear at such a tribunal voluntarily, and the west has no way of arresting them and compelling them to do so, therefore the call might be dismissed as futile. In fact, it is worse than that – it is positively counterproductive, since such arrests could be made only after the defeat and subjugation of Russia.

That enables Putin to argue that those are the real aims of western policy, and that support for Ukraine is merely the means to that end. Such an argument will rally support among patriotic Russians, even those with qualms about the war.

The call for a tribunal is yet another example of a western policy with what might appear to us to have laudable aims but with no attention paid to how it might be understood by the other side.
Anthony Matthew

• Aditya Chakrabortty’s article brings to mind the sage response that Mahatma Gandhi is said to have given to a journalist when asked what he thought of western civilisation: “I think it would be a very good idea.”
Tony Wild
Galle, Sri Lanka

• Many of your articles have marked 2014 as the beginning of Putin’s criminal campaign to re-vassalise Ukraine. Your readers should be reminded that presidential candidate Viktor Yushchenko was poisoned with dioxin in September 2004.
Oscar Clarke

Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication.


The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Sanctions against Russia are not backfiring | Letters
Letters: Immoral behaviour must be challenged, says David Sutherland, while Scott Blau highlights the economic effects, and Bohdan Kisil says the moral effect on Ukrainians is incalculable


01, Aug, 2022 @4:23 PM

Article image
Ukraine must agree a peace deal with Russia. But at what price? | Letters
Letters: Peter Millen, Des Senior, Martin Wright and George Baugh respond to Jonathan Powell’s article on the need to find a settlement that both sides in the war will accept


24, Jun, 2022 @5:07 PM

Article image
Britain must wake up before this war reaches our shores | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to Mikhail Shishkin’s article on the threat of Russia – and why the west can’t wish away the war in Ukraine


23, Aug, 2022 @4:47 PM

Article image
A safe haven for Ukraine’s refugees, or Russia’s rich? | Letters
Letters: Readers on the UK government’s response to the war in Ukraine and offering refuge to those fleeing the Russian invasion


28, Feb, 2022 @5:57 PM

Article image
Arrest warrant for Putin only exposes the cowardice of the ICC | Letters
Letters: The international criminal court has charged Vladimir Putin, but ignored the west’s crimes against humanity, writes Russell Caplan. Plus letters from Christopher Muttukumaru and Derek McMillan

21, Mar, 2023 @5:43 PM

Article image
Nukes, invasion and the blame game on Ukraine | Letters
Letters: Keith Hayward on the different nuclear strategies of Russia and Nato, Peter Hall on politicians choosing conflict over diplomacy and Aldo Zammit Borda on the UN’s failure to keep the peace


27, Feb, 2022 @5:29 PM

Article image
Compromise will be key to ending the Ukraine crisis | Letters
Letters: Will efforts at achieving peace be scuppered by those who would rather see the conflict remain frozen until one side takes all, asks Theo Kyriacou. Plus letters from Russell Caplan, Jill Read and Gary Bennett


11, Feb, 2022 @6:10 PM

Article image
Liz Truss’s careless talk fans the flames of war in Ukraine | Letters
Letters: Neal Ascherson, Simon Diggins, John Gittings and Dr Roger Slack on the foreign secretary’s risky rhetoric


28, Apr, 2022 @4:42 PM

Article image
Writers stand united in a call for peace | Letter
Letter: Signatories from PEN International call for an end to the violence unleashed by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine


27, Feb, 2022 @5:25 PM

Article image
How the west’s foreign policy of self-interest crumbled | Letters
Letters: For too long in foreign crises, we have offered only rhetoric where we calculated that it best served our interests, writes Neil Blackshaw. Plus letters from Roy Boffy and Sally Churchill


02, Mar, 2022 @5:26 PM