UK officials in line for immunity in assisting crimes overseas, say critics

Exclusive: Draft security bill would let spies and ministers enable killings and torture, warn charity and ex-minister

Ministers and spies would be given immunity from accusations of assisting crimes overseas under a new national security law to be debated by MPs next week, a human rights charity and former Tory cabinet minister have warned.

The Home Office was told that the powers being proposed were “far too slack” and would diminish the UK’s moral authority to condemn atrocities such as the killing of the Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi.

The concerns centre on a change to the Serious Crime Act, which was passed in 2007 and made it an offence to do anything in the UK to encourage or assist a crime overseas – such as aiding an unlawful assassination or sending information to be used in a torture interrogation.

Under a clause in the national security bill, which is having its second reading in the House of Commons on Monday, this would be disapplied where “necessary for the proper exercise of any function” of MI5, MI6, GCHQ or the armed forces.

Reprieve, an international human rights charity, said it would effectively grant immunity to ministers or officials who provide information to foreign partners that leads to someone being tortured or unlawfully killed in a drone strike.

Concerns were also raised that the move would restrict victims’ ability to seek civil damages in the courts.

Maya Foa, joint executive director of Reprieve, said it was an unthinkable power to grant ministers and officials that would “risk putting them above the ordinary criminal law” and could even embolden leaders to “commit serious crimes thinking they can do so with effective impunity”.

Foa said that enacting clause 23 of the national security bill would “destroy the UK’s moral legitimacy to condemn similar atrocities by autocratic states” after the murder of Khashoggi, a journalist who US intelligence agencies believe was killed on the orders of the Saudi ruler, Mohammed bin Salman.

The campaign against the move was also supported by the former cabinet minister and civil liberties campaigner David Davis.

Davis said clause 23 was “far too slack in the powers it gives ministers” and was not about granting less contentious national security powers to spy agencies, such as allowing them to place bugs in foreign embassies.

He added: “This bill is drafted so loosely that it could let ministers off the hook if they authorised crimes like murder and torture from the safety of their desks in Whitehall.

“I urge colleagues to constrain it to actions appropriate to our aims and civilised standards.”

The national security bill was announced in last month’s Queen’s speech, with the intention to support Britain’s spy agencies and “help them protect the United Kingdom”. It will be debated when MPs return from recess next Monday.

A Home Office spokesperson said: “The amendment to the Serious Crime Act will only remove the risk of individuals facing criminal liability where they are carrying out authorised lawful activities deemed necessary, in good faith and following proper procedure.

“Put simply, the government believes it is not fair to expect the liability for this action to sit with an individual UK intelligence officer or member of the armed forces who is acting with wholly legitimate intentions.”


Aubrey Allegretti

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Priti Patel pressed to explain award of spy agencies contract to Amazon
US firm Amazon Web Services to host classified material for GCHQ, MI5 and MI6, raising sovereignty concerns

Rajeev Syal Home affairs editor

27, Oct, 2021 @7:23 AM

Article image
UK surveillance and spying watchdog begins work
Investigatory Powers Commissioner’s Office to ensure intelligence and government services act within new law

Owen Bowcott Legal affairs correspondent

31, Aug, 2017 @11:01 PM

Article image
MI6 to recruit hundreds more staff in response to digital technology
Worldwide intelligence agencies increasingly rely upon internet and social media rather than running of agents

Ewen MacAskill

21, Sep, 2016 @8:37 PM

Article image
Edward Snowden has raised 'real issues', says head of UK spy watchdog
Sir Malcolm Rifkind defends UK intelligence agencies' techniques but appears to concede laws may need review

Nick Hopkins and Matthew Taylor

20, Sep, 2013 @5:09 PM

Article image
George Osborne: protecting Britons from terrorism is top priority
Chancellor says MI5 and MI6 will get whatever resources they need, in response to call for new powers after Paris attack

Nicholas Watt and Ewen MacAskill

09, Jan, 2015 @10:47 AM

Article image
Parliamentary committee 'too busy' to question intelligence agencies

Intelligence and security committee postpones televised session with agencies to focus on GCHQ claims and Lee Rigby case

Patrick Wintour, political editor

01, Jul, 2013 @1:36 PM

Article image
UK security agencies unlawfully collected data for 17 years, court rules
Investigatory powers tribunal says secret collection of citizens’ personal data breached human rights law

Alan Travis Home affairs editor

17, Oct, 2016 @1:25 PM

Article image
None of MI6 and MI5's senior officials are from BAME backgrounds
27% of senior roles at MI5 and 20% at MI6 held by women but none by people from black, Asian or minority ethnic backgrounds

Alice Ross and Owen Bowcott

05, Jul, 2016 @6:08 PM

Article image
GCHQ guards consider strike action over pay dispute with G4S

Army may patrol spy centre as talks collapse with PCS union chief, Mark Serwotka, criticising security firm for failing staff

Rajeev Syal

07, Aug, 2013 @5:01 PM

Article image
British spymasters let their frustrations show but explanations remain hidden

A historic 90-minute session of the intelligence and security committee lacked the heat and light of a real grilling

Nick Hopkins

07, Nov, 2013 @9:14 PM