Sanctions against Russia are not backfiring | Letters

Immoral behaviour must be challenged, says David Sutherland, while Scott Blau highlights the economic effects, and Bohdan Kisil says the moral effect on Ukrainians is incalculable

Simon Jenkins (The rouble is soaring and Putin is stronger than ever – our sanctions have backfired, 29 July) writes that sanctions “are meant to intimidate peoples into restraining their princes”. Throughout his piece he puts forward this very instrumentalist view of sanctions, but says not a word about the ethical component.

If you learned that a friend was engaging in deeply immoral behaviour, you may well confront them on it, and if they persist you may choose to distance yourself. I doubt if anyone would think that withholding friendship will force them to change; you just don’t want anything to do with them any more. You no longer operate in a shared moral universe.

I think there are a great number of people in this country who would rather suffer high fuel costs than buy Russian gas – on moral grounds. Of course, the problem with ethical sanctions is where to draw the line; if Russia, then why not Saudi Arabia, China or Israel? This is often a grey area, not least because we in the “enlightened west” are far from being morally pure. But invading a neighbouring country, unprovoked, is as unequivocal a violation of the international order as you can find, and it should not be tolerated, whatever the cost.
David Sutherland

• Mr Jenkins’ well-argued article misses the point. Although he correctly points out that “the interdependence of the world’s economies, so long seen as an instrument of peace, has been made a weapon of war”, he entirely misses the fact that the sanctions regime orchestrated against Russia because of its invasion of Ukraine is primarily targeted at breaking Russia’s interdependence – its supposed integration – in the world economy. Just as Angela Merkel foolishly believed integrating Russia into the world economy by importing its conveniently priced gas would reduce the threat, so now too many, Mr Jenkins included, fail to see that sanctions are effectively decoupling Russia from the world economy. The “cheap” energy from Russia has come at an enormous cost. But better to pay that cost now than to wait until Russia is eyeing Lithuania or Poland.
Scott Blau
Keighley, West Yorkshire

• When I was reading Simon Jenkins’ piece about the sanctions against Russia, my wife was crying about the 50 Ukrainian prisoners of war murdered in Russia’s shelling of Olenivka prison in the Donetsk region. Those were Azov servicemen, who defended Mariupol.

Mr Jenkins might be absolutely right about the economic price of sanctions, but this one-dimensional, gas-heated view misses something important. The sanctions are not just a tool to hammer Russia’s economy “back to the stone age”, but rather a way to demonstrate solidarity with the Ukrainian people.

Switching sanctions off while continuing weapon supplies? Come on, it is like treating a broken limb with painkillers, but not using any firm bandages. The situation is getting painful and more difficult to handle for Russia. The sanctions, combined with Ukrainian successes on the battlefield, make Russia more inclined towards peace talks. Here, 400km from the frontline, we see Russia losing face.

Since 24 February, Ukrainian citizens see the world in black and white. While our people die from Russian missiles, there’s no room for “Yes, but …” We just don’t get that. We have a right to ignore all those “buts”.

I would like to thank the UK for its help and pray that the conflict ends with our victory.
Bohdan Kisil
Kyiv, Ukraine

Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication.


The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Russia and western values: how the east was lost to capitalist opportunism | Letters
Letters: Michael Meadowcroft on the west’s mistakes after the collapse of the Soviet Union and Anthony Matthew on why proposing a Nuremberg-style tribunal for Vladimir Putin is a bad idea. Plus letters from Tony Wild and Oscar Clarke


22, Mar, 2022 @5:52 PM

Article image
Liz Truss’s careless talk fans the flames of war in Ukraine | Letters
Letters: Neal Ascherson, Simon Diggins, John Gittings and Dr Roger Slack on the foreign secretary’s risky rhetoric


28, Apr, 2022 @4:42 PM

Article image
Ukraine must agree a peace deal with Russia. But at what price? | Letters
Letters: Peter Millen, Des Senior, Martin Wright and George Baugh respond to Jonathan Powell’s article on the need to find a settlement that both sides in the war will accept


24, Jun, 2022 @5:07 PM

Article image
A safe haven for Ukraine’s refugees, or Russia’s rich? | Letters
Letters: Readers on the UK government’s response to the war in Ukraine and offering refuge to those fleeing the Russian invasion


28, Feb, 2022 @5:57 PM

Article image
Britain must wake up before this war reaches our shores | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to Mikhail Shishkin’s article on the threat of Russia – and why the west can’t wish away the war in Ukraine


23, Aug, 2022 @4:47 PM

Article image
Writers stand united in a call for peace | Letter
Letter: Signatories from PEN International call for an end to the violence unleashed by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine


27, Feb, 2022 @5:25 PM

Article image
All wars horrify us, but it seems not equally so | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to an article by Nesrine Malik about how the invasion of Ukraine has been viewed differently to other conflicts across the globe


04, Mar, 2022 @6:09 PM

Article image
Keir Starmer’s faith in Nato is misplaced at best | Letters
Letters: Frank Jackson says the Labour leader’s eulogy for Nato is a travesty of history, while Richard Ashwell wonders if he understands what being opposed to war means. Plus letters from Dr Alan Lafferty and Blaine Stothard


14, Feb, 2022 @6:07 PM

Article image
Nukes, invasion and the blame game on Ukraine | Letters
Letters: Keith Hayward on the different nuclear strategies of Russia and Nato, Peter Hall on politicians choosing conflict over diplomacy and Aldo Zammit Borda on the UN’s failure to keep the peace


27, Feb, 2022 @5:29 PM

Article image
Compromise will be key to ending the Ukraine crisis | Letters
Letters: Will efforts at achieving peace be scuppered by those who would rather see the conflict remain frozen until one side takes all, asks Theo Kyriacou. Plus letters from Russell Caplan, Jill Read and Gary Bennett


11, Feb, 2022 @6:10 PM