Republicans confident supreme court will overturn abortion rights

Mississippi governor Tate Reeves says state ‘snap-back’ legislation will ban almost all abortion if Roe v Wade is thrown out entirely

As the supreme court weighs the future of abortion access in America, Republicans on Sunday expressed confidence that the landmark 1973 Roe v Wade decision would soon be overturned, paving the way for a raft of anti-abortion legislation around the country next year.

On Wednesday, the supreme court heard arguments over a Mississippi law that bans abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy.

Observers suggested that the conservative supermajority on the court appeared poised to uphold the law and potentially go further by overturning Roe, which protects a woman’s right to choose. A decision is not expected until June next year.

Mississippi’s governor, Tate Reeves, told CNN’s State of the Union he had “some reason for optimism” after this week’s arguments.

He also confirmed that if the landmark ruling was overturned entirely, Mississippi would enforce a ban on almost all abortions in the state under a so-called “trigger law”.

“That is a yes,” Reeves said when asked if he would enforce the “snap-back” legislation.

“Because if you believe as I believe very strongly that that innocent, unborn child in the mother’s womb is in fact a child, the most important word when we talk about unborn children is not unborn, but it’s children.”

The position is not representative of the majority of Americans. According to recent polling, seven in 10 are opposed to overturning Roe v Wade while 59% believe abortion should be legal in all or most circumstances.

Nonetheless, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a global research and policy organisation “committed to advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights”, 21 US states are certain to attempt some form of ban on abortion should Roe be overturned, using laws already on the books.

Reeves caveated his answer by cautioning that Mississippi’s response to the forthcoming supreme court ruling would be “dependent upon how the court rules and exactly what those opinions allow us to do”.

He also noted that any decision would not lead to a national ban but could permit states to make their own determinations.

Mike Braun, a Republican senator for Indiana, echoed a number of Reeves’ arguments. He told NBC’s Meet the Press he wanted “abortions to be eliminated from the landscape” but would not be drawn into specifics regarding potential laws in his state.

Indiana has enacted 55 abortion restrictions and bans in the past decade, according to the Guttmacher Institute, but does not have a “trigger law” or equivalent on the books.

It is listed by the institute as one of five states without these laws that are still likely to move towards almost total bans should Roe be overturned.

“When it comes to things like abortion, I think it’s clear it’s time to turn it back to the states,” Braun told NBC.

Since former president Donald Trump installed three conservative justices to the supreme court in just four years, both sides of the fight over abortion rights have been preparing for a legal showdown.

According to the Associated Press, campaign finance data reveals that pro-abortion-access groups donated $8m in 2018 and more than $10m in 2020.

Those numbers outpace the public contributions of anti-abortion groups, which donated $2.6m in 2018 and $6.3m in 2020, according to data.

But the complexity of the network of non-profits and “dark money” funds makes it difficult to produce a full accounting of the money flows.


Oliver Laughland

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
'Five-alarm fire': activists say supreme court pick threatens abortion rights
Campaigners promise ad buys, day of action and intense campaigning in effort to stop nomination of Brett Kavanaugh

Jessica Glenza in New York

10, Jul, 2018 @5:20 PM

Article image
Trump anti-abortion supreme court pick 'not acceptable', says Collins
Democrats hope Maine Republican may defect in confirmation vote after president announces pick to replace Kennedy on 9 July

Tom McCarthy

01, Jul, 2018 @2:20 PM

Article image
Who is Amy Coney Barrett? Trump's anti-abortion supreme court nominee
The 48-year-old conservative was favorite to become Trump’s third pick for the court, having been shortlisted in 2018

Edward Helmore

26, Sep, 2020 @9:08 PM

Article image
Trump names Amy Coney Barrett for supreme court, stoking liberal backlash
The Indiana conservative would replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg, as a secretive Catholic group, of which Barrett is a member, steps into the spotlight

David Smith in Washington and Martin Pengelly in New York

26, Sep, 2020 @9:51 PM

Article image
Supreme court justice Stephen Breyer: Democrats must ‘get Republicans talking’
As abortion rights case looms before 6-3 conservative panel, 82-year-old liberal touts belief in upholding precedent

Martin Pengelly and agencies

30, May, 2021 @12:09 PM

Article image
Amy Coney Barrett: what will she mean for women's rights?
If Trump’s third nominee is confirmed, the court will tilt to the right. Campaigners fear setbacks on abortion, healthcare and more

Alexandra Villarreal

27, Sep, 2020 @2:31 PM

Article image
Democrats position themselves as last line of defense for abortion rights
Party sees new urgency – and political opportunity – amid growing threat to Roe v Wade

Lauren Gambino in Washington DC

26, Sep, 2021 @7:00 AM

Article image
Senators stir ghosts of Scalia and Ginsburg for Amy Coney Barrett hearing
Amid talk of originalism, harking to a time when only white men with property could vote, Republican ears pricked up

Lauren Gambino in Washington

13, Oct, 2020 @8:27 PM

Article image
Biden condemns US supreme court’s ‘unprecedented assault’ on abortion rights
President denounces justices for failing to block Texas law and vows to ‘ensure woman have access to safe and legal abortions’

Lauren Aratani

02, Sep, 2021 @4:51 PM

Article image
Abortion rights advocates vow to fight on after supreme court hearing
Leaders say they will look to statehouses and lower courts if justices allow undermining of Roe v Wade

Jessica Glenza

02, Dec, 2021 @6:00 AM