The language that disguises the government’s failings on coronavirus | Letters

From war analogies to the dreaded phrase ‘ramping up’, readers discuss the new vocabulary used by ministers to describe the Covid-19 crisis

Your article on the language of Boris Johnson’s speech (‘Invisible mugger’: how Boris Johnson’s language hints at his thinking, 27 April) examines the use of metaphors during this crisis. Equally important is the very use of vocabulary. One of the most popular words of the moment is “unprecedented”, increasingly used by politicians as if it meant “unpredicted”. This crisis was both predictable and predicted, as your reporting makes clear. But to imply that this pandemic was unpredictable and unpredicted relieves politicians of culpability.

Other linguistic constructions have all the appearance of the beginnings of a blame game; in particular “we are following the science”. To think there is some single and undisputed body of knowledge and method called “the science” is plain wrong. But if politicians can maintain the fiction that there is something called “the science” and they simply follow it, then how can they be blamed? As you say, vocabulary and metaphors are not neutral constructs.
Adrian Darnell
Durham

• The constant use of war analogies is enabling ministers to treat the public as if they were unable to grasp the risks attached to particular strategies. Talking about the coronavirus as “the enemy” allows the government to keep its strategy, if it has one, secret. The difference is that the virus is not like a wartime enemy; it is not listening, nor will it alter its behaviour if our strategy is publicly known. There are no spies feeding the information to the virus.

The arrogance of ministers at the daily briefing, repeating over and over that they are taking “the right decisions at the right time”, suggests an omnipotence that they surely do not have. History will decide whether the decisions were the right ones. Right now it seems the government has no more idea what to do than anyone else, and that is why it trots out platitudes. Are they reassuring the public or themselves?
Morag Watkins
Bovingdon, Hertfordshire

• I am starting a one-man campaign to eradicate the spread of the “ramping up” virus, which seems to be afflicting politicians, journalists, and anyone who comments on the Covid-19 pandemic. I yell at the radio every time Matt Hancock talks about “ramping up coronavirus testing”, which he does several times during the “Hancock’s Half Hour” briefing at 5pm. Why has he abandoned the perfectly adequate verb “increase”?

Could we start, please, with an instruction to all Guardian journalists to call out politicians who use the phrase? They themselves should pay a £100 penalty into a “ramping up” box each time they use it in an article. Proceeds, of course, to the NHS or social care, according to the editor’s choice.
John Speed
Luxembourg

• I congratulate the Guardian for using the term “physical distancing” rather than the misnomer “social distancing”. Physical distancing actually enables some social contact. It helps us to visit and support those who are self-isolating. It has allowed me to sing with my neighbours: for the NHS on Thursday evenings and to celebrate May Day on 1 May: the first time in 400 years that May Day has not been celebrated with singing from the top of Magdalen Tower in Oxford.
Dr Hazel Dawe
Oxford

• “I am ashamed of sending colleagues into mortal risk on my behalf” says Dr Alan Willson (Letters, 27 April). So should we all be, particularly the government. There is an old Dutch phrase, “verloren hoop” which meant “lost heap” and referred to the soldiers who were put in the frontline of a battle in the certainty that they would die. Without PPE and all the protective gear, some of our caring staff have been treated like that “lost heap”. The phrase later became “forlorn hope” in modern English. which has quite a different meaning – our marvellous NHS has not been a forlorn hope, but “a very present help in trouble”, and we thank them from the bottom of our hearts.
Susan Castles
Wem, Shropshire

• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com

• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters

Letters

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Coronavirus: a test strategy that failed | Letters
Letters: Readers comment on the UK government’s response, suggesting it moved too late, is negligent and is spreading the wrong message – again

Letters

03, Apr, 2020 @4:06 PM

Article image
Ministers must be held to account for PPE failings | Letters
Letters: Readers on the government’s response to shortages of personal protective equipment for NHS workers and others, and the role of the press in asking the tough questions at daily briefings

Letters

12, Apr, 2020 @5:12 PM

Article image
Catastrophic errors in the handling of coronavirus | Letters
Letters: Alan Walker cannot forgive the the absence of protection for care homes, Richard Smith recalls Boris Johnson’s scrapping of a pandemic committee, and Peter Watts says the death toll can be attributed to six pre-Covid factors. Plus letters from Linda Karlsen, Maggie Winters and Teresa Heeks

Letters

29, Jan, 2021 @5:57 PM

Article image
The UK's catastrophic failure to heed the coronavirus warnings | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to an article by Nesrine Malik that said many coronavirus deaths could have been prevented had the government acted faster

Letters

14, Apr, 2020 @5:16 PM

Article image
Why we should fear Boris Johnson’s bid to seize control of the NHS | Letters
Letters: The coronavirus care homes scandal highlights the dangers of government plans for more direct control of the health service, writes Huw Lloyd-Richards, while Mavis Zutshi calls for a return to the founding values of the NHS

Letters

14, Jul, 2020 @5:13 PM

Article image
Double standards over Neil Ferguson’s resignation | Letters
Letters: The epidemiologist made an error of judgment but his research may have saved thousands of lives, says Joe McCarthy. Plus Dr Chris Newall on Boris Johnson’s own disregard for safety. Plus letters from Prof Adrian Renton, Angela Barton and Dr John Doherty

Letters

06, May, 2020 @5:35 PM

Article image
It’s shameful to blame doctors for shortages of PPE | Letter
Letter: The parents of a GP trainee now working on the Covid-19 frontline condemn the health secretary Matt Hancock’s suggestion that NHS staff have been overusing personal protective equipment

Letters

13, Apr, 2020 @5:15 PM

Article image
On Covid in care homes, all the ‘big calls’ were wrong | Letter
Letter: Tony Kemp responds to the high court ruling that the government’s discharge of untested patients into care homes at the height of the coronavirus pandemic was unlawful

Letters

28, Apr, 2022 @4:40 PM

Article image
The failings behind the UK’s abysmal death toll | Letters
Letters: Inadequate lockdowns, incompetent ministers and indifference to suffering are all factors behind the government’s disastrous handling of the Covid pandemic, write Prof Joe Sim and Prof Steve Tombs. Plus letters from Val Mainwood, Brendan Martin, Adrian Cosker, Jane Deighton and Fiona Collins

Letters

27, Jan, 2021 @5:59 PM

Article image
PPE debacle should be sewn up on the home front | Letters
Letters: John O’Driscoll says the UK has a dynamic garment industry and worldwide shortages cannot be blamed, while Fred Brook recalls a time when hospitals got what they needed and weavers got work and wages. Plus letters from John Paterson and Sarah James

Letters

24, Apr, 2020 @4:55 PM