We need to be physically distant, but we need to share our collective pain | Tim Costello

The wave of illness and death brought on by coronavirus is only beginning. How do we prepare for the sadness that will be thrust upon us?

Join Tim Costello as he gives the inaugural Australia at Home lunchtime briefing at 1pm

Like many people, I am re-reading The Plague by Albert Camus. I haven’t picked it up for years.

“The first thing the plague brought to our town was exile ... It was undoubtedly the feeling of exile – that sensation of a void within which never left us ... they drifted through life rather than lived, the prey of aimless days and sterile memories, like wandering shadows that could have acquired substance only by consenting to root themselves in the solid earth of their distress.”

We are bracing ourselves for the full force of a once-in-a-century pandemic that will hit us like a tsunami in the coming weeks. We are watching the trailer with the devastating images from hospitals in Italy and emptied streets in Madrid, London and New York. The daily death tolls on our morning social media feeds haunt us like a shadow all day.

To keep each other safe, we are preparing to pay an unprecedented economic cost, closing entire sectors of the economy, wiping billions off our super and stocks, putting tens or even hundreds of thousands of people out of work.

But I’m concerned that over the coming weeks we fall into the trap of kidding ourselves this is the crisis, that the preparations and changes to our normal routines represent the full impact of this cruel virus.

Because this exile is not the crisis – it is the beginning of the crisis. We may have moved to higher ground, but the wave of illness and death is yet to hit. And when it comes, many of our fellow Australians will die alone or in crowded hospitals.

As we mobilise for action on these fronts, I am concerned we are not preparing for the wave of grief that will have to be expressed alone, in ways totally foreign to our natural instinct to come together and physically embrace each other.

How will someone mourn the passing of their parent if they can’t sit with them in their final hours? How will we mark the loss of friends and colleagues when we aren’t allowed the time and space to honour them? How will local communities cope when loved health workers die?

How do we prepare for the sadness that will be thrust upon us?

We must prepare to rediscover the art of lament.

Lament is a one of those words that seems to have lost its meaning. Lament is not a label to put on a person or a situation – it’s the communal sharing of this grief, an act of solidarity that ensures no one needs to grieve alone, despite our physical distance.

If we are going to find a way to lament through the coming months, we need to start now by actively participating in our shared sense of exile. As Camus reminds us, it is about giving wandering shadows substance by rooting ourselves in the solid earth of our distress.

Sharing exile can take many forms, but it starts with developing common rituals – whether it is joining in online church services or choral events freely available, lighting a candle with friends across a Zoom meeting, clapping our valiant health workers on our doorstep at 8pm each evening or singing from balconies like the Lombards.

It’s also about meditating on what we are grateful for – family, friends, a room with a view – even in quarantine we need to find meaning in our lives, to know we are seen, that our pain is validated by others and to know we are loved.

At these times of lament, charities have always filled an important role – to organise the collective support for the one in need, anchored in a common benevolent love of humanity.

But even here the virus challenges us. Many of our charities are facing their own crises, first in the largely older volunteer force who do the work and, inevitably, facing a reduction in the amount of money people can afford to donate to support their work.

Some of these institutions may not survive, others will need to fundamentally rethink their delivery models, but what will remain constant is the need for the act of charity, that benevolent love of humanity, to sustain us.

That’s why the nation’s major charities are coming together to create a “Charities Cabinet” to advise the government on ways we can deliver all our citizens the basics of a roof, a meal, a sense of human connection and a reminder that in the midst of global mayhem every individual matters. Charities exist to prioritise the needs of the vulnerable; whether they have insecure housing, or no housing. All indeed matter. Charity is the old English word for inclusive love.

This is a moment in our shared humanity when we don’t know what happens next, but I suspect that we will need more than just an economic stimulus; we will need a stimulus in civility, in community and in charity that can only be generated from within, as we lament and then renew ourselves together.

In the words of Adam Lindsay Gordon, the 19th century maverick Australian poet and politician: “Life is mostly froth and bubble, Two things stand like stone. Kindness in another’s trouble, Courage in your own.”

These will be the saddest of times, but when it passes we will have the chance to rebuild our world on the charity in all of us.

• Join Tim Costello as he gives the inaugural Australia at Home lunchtime briefing at 1pm Monday



Contributor

Tim Costello

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Why are Australian church leaders opposing the Oxford coronavirus vaccine?
Church leaders are concerned the vaccine uses cell lines from an aborted foetus in the 1970s, but scientists say their priorities are ‘misplaced’

Mostafa Rachwani

26, Aug, 2020 @5:30 AM

Article image
What is the Narnia-inspired Caldron Pool and is it fomenting ‘Christian nationalism’ in Australia?
Website hosts petitions opposing Covid rules on religious grounds, as well as contributions from rightwing politicians such as George Christensen

Tory Shepherd

21, Sep, 2021 @5:30 PM

Article image
'I could physically feel the germs on me': how Covid is a double-edged sword for those with OCD
For some the pandemic has worsened their symptoms, but others say social distancing and hygiene measures have made life easier

Matilda Boseley

20, Feb, 2021 @7:00 PM

Article image
Getting to grips with effective altruism | Letters
Letters: It involves just a commitment to using charitable giving in the most effective way. That’s not utilitarianism, says Stephen Law. Plus Barbara Foster suggests some extra reading on the subject

Letters

26, Nov, 2017 @7:00 PM

Article image
Multi-faith moan about youth is unjustified | Ian Linden
Ian Linden: The perception religion no longer appeals to the young is misplaced – just look at the positive results of interfaith action

Ian Linden

07, Oct, 2010 @8:00 AM

Aid would survive without religion | Fiona Fox

Fiona Fox: Reducing suffering is an aim of both religion and science – but religious groups have made a disproportionate contribution

Fiona Fox

20, Sep, 2010 @11:58 AM

Article image
Charles Wickham-Jones obituary
Other lives: ICI chemist who found a new role in charity work in post-industrial Britain

Mark Wickham-Jones

31, Jul, 2017 @4:03 PM

Article image
Faith-based groups 'increasingly stepping in to plug gaps in NHS'
More than 3,500 churches and 200,000 volunteers are helping overstretched NHS, says study

Nicola Slawson

30, May, 2018 @2:54 PM

Article image
Religious faith builds a civil society in a way secularism does not | Austen Ivereigh
Austen Ivereigh: Religion generates networks of participation that are far more lasting and committed than secular civic organisations

Austen Ivereigh

29, Sep, 2011 @12:37 PM

Article image
Contempt for faith sits ill with Guardian readers | Letters
Letters: The paper’s founders and first editors were Unitarians, who took a firm stand against unthinking orthodoxy – which for them was creedal Christianity. Today it continues to take such a stand, but now the prevailing orthodoxy is hubristic humanism

Letters

01, Jun, 2016 @6:02 PM