What is the science behind the UK's coronavirus distancing rules?

Experts reveal why the 2-metre guidance matters and the importance of opening doors and windows

Since the coronavirus outbreak reached the UK, health officials have recommended people stay at least 2 metres apart to reduce their risk of picking up the infection or spreading it to others.

But in recent weeks, as the impact of the lockdown on the economy has become clearer, the government has come under increasing pressure to relax the physical distancing rules so pubs, cafes and restaurants and other businesses can reopen fully.

Here’s what the science says about physical distancing.

Why does distance matter?

Coronavirus spreads when virus particles get into the body through the eyes, nose or mouth. One route is via contaminated surfaces, such as door handles that are touched by people with virus on their hands. But the more common route of infection appears to be tiny virus-bearing droplets that are released into the air by coughs and sneezes, and to a lesser extent when people talk or shout. These droplets fall to the ground with the heaviest falling nearest to the infected person and the lightest falling further away. The aim of physical distancing is to be far enough away from an infected person to avoid the airborne droplets.

What distance is recommended?

Health officials in the UK recommend people keep at least 2 metres from each other. At that distance, they believe the risk of infection during face-to-face conversation reduces to an acceptable level. The same distance applies in Canada and Spain. But other countries are less cautious. In the US people are advised to keep at least 6ft, or 1.8 metres, apart. Other countries, such as Germany, Italy, Greece, Australia and the Netherlands have opted for 1.5 metres. South Korea advises 1.4 metres, and in France, Denmark, China, Hong Kong and Singapore it is 1 metre.

Where do the numbers come from? 

In the 1930s, a Harvard sanitary engineer called William Wells proposed that some infectious diseases were spread by airborne droplets. His experiments showed that most droplets sprayed from the mouth fell to the ground within 3ft, and so beyond this distance infection was unlikely. The result shaped scientific opinion on what is a safe distance and underlies the World Health Organization’s 1-metre recommendation.

But while 1 metre reduces the risk substantially, another coronavirus outbreak – Sars in 2003 – showed it may not be sufficient. Tests of passengers on one flight found that 90% who caught Sars from an infected passenger had been sitting more than three feet away from them. A distance of 6ft or 2 metres became the more cautious recommendation. The latest paper on physical distancing from the government’s scientific advisory group on emergencies recommends keeping the 2-metre rule but states it “should be seen as a ballpark guide to distancing rather than an absolute value.”

Is distance everything?

No. The way a person is exposed to the virus and how long for are important too. Because coughs are more forceful than conversations, they propel droplets further. According to UK science advisers, exposure to one cough at 2 metres has a similar risk to talking with someone for a minute at 1 metre and for half an hour at 2 metres. Likewise, a six-second chat at 1 metre is comparable to a one minute conversation at 2 metres. Explaining the importance of the 2-metre guidance, the government’s chief scientific adviser, Sir Patrick Vallance told the Commons health committee in May that the risk at 1 metre was 10 to 30 times higher than the risk at 2 metres. 

Is it safe to reduce the distance?

A recent Lancet study commissioned by the World Health Organization found that the chance of transmitting or becoming infected by the virus, with no other protection in place such as a face mask, fell dramatically with distance. At within 1 metre, the risk was 12.8% but this dropped to 2.6% at 1.5 metres and to about 1.3% at 2 metres.

The decision on whether to reduce the distance must weigh up the direct public health risks from the virus and the harm caused by businesses folding or being unable to operate with 2-metre distancing enforced. “I think it would be reasonable to reduce it to 1.5 metres as long as strict guidelines are in place for what else needs to be done,” said Linda Bauld, a professor of public Health at the University of Edinburgh. 

What other measures do we need?

Beyond handwashing and distancing where possible, wearing face masks and ensuring venues are well ventilated will all help. Bauld says there is a case for bar and restaurant staff wearing masks to prevent them unwittingly spreading infections. And when people are in proximity for some time, such as in the queue for the toilets, the more cautious 2-metre distancing rule is preferable to standing closer. Another important move is to improve air circulation by opening doors and windows, which will be easier in the UK over the summer than later in the year. 

Is it safer being outdoors?

Yes. In an enclosed space such as a living room or bedroom there are no appreciable air currents to help disperse virus-containing droplets or extremely tiny aerosols. The latter tend to be smaller than five thousandths of a millimetre wide and can remain suspended in the air for some time. How important these are for spreading infection is unclear, however.

• This article was amended on 26 June 2020 to clarify that the 12.8% risk identified in the Lancet study relates to distances within 1 metre, not at 1 metre as a previous version said.

Contributor

Ian Sample Science editor

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
UK minister hails 'game-changing' coronavirus immunity test
Edward Argar says antibody test has been approved but none have been purchased yet

Rowena Mason and Sarah Boseley

14, May, 2020 @8:15 AM

Article image
Dominic Raab rejects Tory demands for easing of Covid rules
Foreign secretary says ‘we’re on track’ to meet vaccine targets, but cautions against making any promises on reopening

Peter Walker Political correspondent

14, Feb, 2021 @9:43 AM

Article image
Scientists report flaws in WHO-funded study on 2-metre distancing
Mistakes mean findings should not be used as evidence for relaxing rule, say professors

Ian Sample Science editor

14, Jun, 2020 @3:07 PM

Article image
Coronavirus: April will be 'second dose month', says UK vaccines minister
Nadhim Zahawi hails milestone of 30m first doses and says UK still on track to protect all adults by July

Dan Sabbagh and Andrew Sparrow

28, Mar, 2021 @7:13 PM

Article image
Coronavirus: hospitals in West Midlands 'will be at capacity by next weekend'
Mayor says NEC field hospital will be ready to take patients as data shows 21% of deaths in England were in Midlands

Josh Halliday, Pamela Duncan and Caelainn Barr

03, Apr, 2020 @4:05 PM

Article image
Coronavirus: science chief defends UK plan from criticism
Patrick Vallance says aim is to broaden peak of epidemic as Jeremy Hunt raises concerns

Heather Stewart and Mattha Busby

13, Mar, 2020 @10:31 AM

Article image
We doctors are scared of the coronavirus crisis. How could we not be? | Anonymous
I’m an NHS consultant and I take heart from the calmness and courage my staff are showing, despite the creeping fear

The Secret Consultant

16, Mar, 2020 @11:10 AM

Article image
Genetics in focus after coronavirus deaths of siblings and twins
Recent deaths have stood out, but scientists say they must be interpreted with caution

Ian Sample Science editor

05, May, 2020 @11:17 AM

Article image
Flurry of coronavirus reinfections leaves scientists puzzled
Though far from common, some patients developed worse symptoms the second time they became infected with Covid-19

Ian Sample Science editor

06, Oct, 2020 @12:37 PM

Article image
How will the UK's new 14-day coronavirus quarantine work?
MPs raise concerns about potentially limited impact of measures compared with damage they could do to industry

Jamie Grierson Home affairs correspondent

02, Jun, 2020 @11:27 AM