Britain’s despicable history of slavery needs teaching and commemorating | Letters

Guardian readers respond to Afua Hirsch’s call for a London memorial to the victims of slavery

Thank you for the article by Afua Hirsch (Britain was built on the backs of slaves, 23 October). I am 77. As a child in the 1940s, I was proud that vast areas of the world map were coloured pink, and amazed that the language that was spoken in many of them was named after the apparently little country that I lived in. In my teens (by which time most of the pink had gone) I worked as a cleaner in my local hospital as a holiday job, and brought a recently arrived Caribbean nurse home for a meal. I was embarrassed that, although my parents tried to be welcoming to her, they were unable to behave and speak to her in a natural manner.

In retrospect I recognised that they saw her as “other” before they saw her as a lonely young woman in a strange country.

It is depressing that 60 years later this attitude is still so common. Hirsch is right to bemoan the government’s failure to fund a memorial to the contribution made by people of black African origin to our society. Their slave labour under the “ownership” of British and other white people brought us products we took for granted, such as sugar, rum, bananas and cotton, long before they came to the UK to give us their labour willingly.

We owe them so much. Would a crowdfunding campaign wake the government up? It is essential that today’s white children are taught about those formerly pink areas on the map and the human cost they represented. As a counterbalance, black children should be proud of the contribution made by their ancestors to the society that we now live in together.
Gillian Morriss-Kay
Emeritus professor of developmental anatomy, University of Oxford

• There was much in Afua Hirsch’s article that I did not agree with; not least the headline suggestion that “Britain was built on the backs of slaves”. That would come as a surprise to the descendants of the millions of working-class people who lived short, unhealthy lives of unremitting toil during the industrial revolution; or the descendants of the millions of Irish and Scots forced to flee their land by poverty and unjust structures of property ownership, mostly in the century after the abolition of the slave trade.

That is not to say that the circumstances are the same: there is something qualitatively more awful about slavery than “free” gross exploitation, but it does suggest that the arguments need to be nuanced, if they are not just going to attract toxic reactions.

Where I do agree is that black history needs to be mainstreamed and not just confined to one month a year. It would then allow the exploration of arguments around structural conditions, the relative contribution of slavery to Britain’s economy, and the full details of the anti-slavery movement – lasting over a century, from the first stirrings of conscience in the 1770s, to the conclusion of the Royal Navy’s anti-slaving patrols in the 1870s.

That is a very full story, one well worth studying, and one that would make a truly fitting memorial, if every British child knew it.
Simon Diggins
Rickmansworth, Hertfordshire

• Afua Hirsch is right to call for an appropriate memorial to Africans enslaved by Britain. There’s also a need for justice for the victims, which requires that we compensate their heirs. Germany has so far paid over $70bn in compensation to the victims and survivors of the Holocaust and their heirs, but there’s a shameful lack of any equivalent compensation paid to the heirs of the victims of the Atlantic slave trade and slavery in the Americas by the descendant governments of those who committed that despicable crime.
Chris Hughes

• I would fully support Afua Hirsch’s call for a slave memorial to be erected in the heart of London. A few years ago, teaching some WEA classes on the British empire, I asked every group to come up with three “positive” features about the British empire, and three “negative”. Every group put “ending the slave trade” in the positive column. Not one came up with Britain’s deep involvement with slavery as a negative.
Jim Chrystie
Warlingham, Surrey

• Join the debate – email

• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit

• Do you have a photo you’d like to share with Guardian readers? Click here to upload it and we’ll publish the best submissions in the letters spread of our print edition


The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
We can’t ignore how slavery has shaped Britain | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to Olivette Otele’s article about how the culture war is impeding truthful reflection on the country’s difficult history


24, Aug, 2022 @3:58 PM

Article image
Black History Month needs a wider focus | Letter
Letter: British colonial exploitation affected many countries, and the descendants of those who suffered should also have the opportunity to explore and criticise it, writes Peter Rowlands


18, Oct, 2020 @4:32 PM

Article image
A progressive way of teaching history | Letter
Letter: Jeremy Waxman responds to David Olusoga saying that history should not be treated as a ‘soft play area’


27, Jun, 2022 @4:09 PM

Article image
It’s vital to teach black British history in schools | Letter
Letters: Marika Sherwood on why this missing history must be put on the curriculum for students and teachers


13, Jan, 2020 @5:41 PM

Article image
The debt that Britain still owes for slavery | Letters
Letters: Mary Ruck on the forced labour endured by Kenyans during the 1950s state of emergency, Dr Charmian Goldwyn on today’s inequalities, Fawzi Ibrahim on the downside to reparations and James Heartfield on Lord Palmerston’s acknowledgment of Britain’s debt to Africa. Plus letters from Norman Miller and John Pelling


12, Jul, 2020 @4:21 PM

Article image
The British empire’s role in ending slavery | Letters
Letters: Paul Martin says the British have plenty to be proud about. Rosie Turner, Roger Downie and Bernie Evans disagree


14, Feb, 2018 @5:36 PM

Article image
Oxford’s Rhodes statue and the bogus argument against its fall | Letters
Letters: Martin Platt says history not censored by the removal of monuments, while Richard Pantlin of the Oxford Zimbabwe Arts Partnership expresses his disappointment over Oriel College’s decision


24, May, 2021 @5:14 PM

Article image
Mayflower 400 is ignoring slavery | Letters
Letters: Mayflower 400 is commemorating the Mayflower voyage of 1620 without reference to the context and aftermath of that colonising venture, writes Angela Sherlock


08, Nov, 2019 @5:59 PM

Article image
Why Britain needs a slavery memorial | Letter
Letter: It would be a permanent sign of regret and a tangible tribute to those on whom much of our prosperity is based, writes Steve Barrass


06, Dec, 2021 @5:42 PM

Article image
Like it or not, we all bear some responsibility for slavery | Letters
Letters: When it comes to atoning for the slave trade, we need to acknowledge how much we have benefited, says Prof Sir Roderick Floud. Plus letters from Nic Madge, Morris Gyles, Rex Knight and Kit Jackson

20, Mar, 2023 @5:12 PM