UK must take lead on nuclear weapons | Letters

The tide towards annihilation can be turned if the political will is there, writes CND general secretary Kate Hudson

As your article on nuclear weapons states (All you wanted to know about nuclear war but were too afraid to ask, 16 July), the use of a nuclear weapons is now more likely than at any time since the cold war. Billions are being spent on modernising superpower nuclear arsenals. The old “deterrence” myth – that they will never be used – is still being deployed, but at the same time Trump is unveiling plans for new “usable” nuclear weapons, and outlining more scenarios in which to use them.

With Trump’s tearing up of the Iran nuclear deal, the dangers of nuclear proliferation in the Middle East are increasing. The possibility of denuclearisation of the Korean peninsula hangs on a thread – a return to threat and counter-threat is an ever-present danger, with potentially catastrophic consequences. But this tide towards annihilation can be turned if the political will is there. Maybe we can’t expect that from the trigger-happy US president, but we should demand it from our own government.

It’s a year since the UN general assembly voted overwhelmingly to support a treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons. The UK government has poured scorn on it, but this is a very real global initiative that presents a way out of the accelerating nuclear crisis.

There is much talk of Britain’s standing in the world. This is a way in which Britain could genuinely lead: by supporting the treaty and helping to end the impasse between nuclear weapons states. We ask this of our government, because without such an initiative, the threat of destruction will only grow.
Kate Hudson
General secretary, CND

• Your article points to the 1959 film of Nevil Shute’s 1957 On the Beach as “the first major post-apocalyptic movie”. Revisiting the book and the film after 25 years of researching British nuclear – not atomic – tests in Australia I was struck by Shute’s understanding that global winds would bring radiation from the northern hemisphere to the southern from nuclear warfare that began between “minor” nuclear powers.

The timing of the book and the film are also important in retrospect. Ava Gardner arrived in Sydney on New Year’s Day 1959 to start filming precisely a year after Harold Macmillan made the first visit to Australia by a serving British prime minister. He came to tell the Australian cabinet that Britain would be rejoining the nuclear alliance with the US because it had shown that it could build a thermonuclear H bomb – in Australia – and detonate it off Malden Island in the Pacific in May 1957. The UK would therefore be withdrawing from the Australian test sites and would not be in a position to leave tactical ballistic missiles developed at Woomera Rocket Range as an independent nuclear deterrent as had been argued for by Prime Minister Chifley, Sir Mark Oliphant and the Royal Australian Air Force.

There are intercontinental nuclear missiles in Australia today, but they are American. I am putting the archival evidence for these statements on my website the Rabbitt Review.
Sue Rabbitt Roff
Cellardyke, Fife

• Why perpetuate the myth that the Non-Proliferation Treaty somehow legitimised the nuclear weapons of an “official owners club”? The then five nuclear weapons states were defined as such solely for the purposes of the NPT, which was a bargain between nuclear and non-nuclear states: non-nuclear states had the right to develop civil nuclear power and nuclear weapons states had an obligation to disarm, as clarified by the international court of justice in 1996. The continued refusal of the nuclear weapons states to fulfil their treaty obligations was an important driver for the ban treaty agreed by a huge majority at the UN almost exactly a year ago. All nuclear weapons states, including the UK, are embarking on a programme of modernisation and deserve no kudos for retiring weapons of an older generation.
Joanna Bazley

• Join the debate – email

• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit


The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Chances for progress towards a nuclear-free world | Letters
Letters: Bruce Kent of CND and Linda Rogers respond to Owen Jones’ article on Jeremy Corbyn and the UK’s nuclear weapons. Plus letters from Mike Clancy of Prospect, Frank Jackson and David Lowry


01, Apr, 2018 @5:17 PM

Article image
Strategies for nuclear weapons and waste | Letters
Letters: It is essential that Europe does not become the arena for a build-up of nuclear weapons, writes Catherine West MP. It is surely time to bury the Micawber principle, says Professor Neil Hyatt


07, Aug, 2019 @4:59 PM

Article image
Trump really has achieved a historic breakthrough – for the Kim dynasty | Jonathan Freedland
With a shake of the hand, the US president has tightened Kim Jong-un’s grip over an enslaved nation – and got almost nothing in return, says Guardian columnist Jonathan Freedland

Jonathan Freedland

12, Jun, 2018 @12:54 PM

Article image
Short-term thinking of UK nuclear policy | Letters
Letters: Sue Roaf writes that evacuation plans for Hinkley Point would have to involve at least a million people; while Diarmuid Foley says that, in the modern world, the route to weapons-grade material is not taken through the civilian nuclear fuel cycle


03, Jan, 2018 @6:05 PM

Article image
Donald Trump, North Korea and the potential global consequences
Letters: Readers respond to this week’s summit between Donald Trump and Kim Jong-un


13, Jun, 2018 @4:44 PM

Article image
UK must take lead role in de-escalating threat of nuclear war | Letters
Letters: Fourteen medical doctors and scientists call on the British government to join the international treaty demanding the ban of nuclear weapons


31, Aug, 2017 @6:33 PM

Article image
Seeing nuclear weapons from North Korea’s perspective | Letters
Letters: Successive British governments have for decades been afflicted with exactly the same delusion as Kim Jong-un


04, Sep, 2017 @6:19 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on North Korea: a brewing nuclear crisis | Editorial
Editorial: Pyongyang’s truce with Washington could end with terrible results. To avoid that, international efforts – notably from the US – are needed


08, Dec, 2019 @6:29 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on North Korea: no art as Trump seeks deal | Editorial
Editorial: The US president boasts of a possible peace deal with North Korea, but the prospects of success at next month’s planned summit in Singapore look worse than ever


18, May, 2018 @4:18 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Trump and arms: can the doomsday clock be stopped? | Editorial
Editorial: The threat of an arms race is real and growing. The news of recent days has highlighted the dangers


20, Jan, 2019 @6:30 PM