Russia’s archives still open for business

Donald Filtzer says Antony Beevor was wrong to assert that most Russian archives were closed to foreign historians in 2000, while Zofia Nowinska puts Finland’s wartime alliance with Germany in context

Antony Beevor’s larger argument about the politicisation of history writing (Review, 3 February) is certainly correct, but his statement that “most Russian archives, especially the military ones, were closed to foreign historians back in 2000 after the tantalising glimpses we had enjoyed from 1992” will come as a huge surprise to the many dozens, if not hundreds of foreign historians who have been working in these same archives from the early 1990s up to the present day, many of them researching quite sensitive topics. It is true that the archive of Russia’s defence ministry is virtually inaccessible to foreigners, and access to the security services’ archive is highly restricted, but all other archive collections, both in Moscow and in regional centres, remain open, including one of the other military archives.

It is true, as he says, that parts of some collections may be taken out of circulation, but these cases are relatively rare, and it is usually possible to find the same, or at least comparable material, elsewhere. The unsung heroes in all of this are the Russian archivists, who with few exceptions are highly trained, dedicated specialists who go out of their way to help scholars, both Russian and foreign, obtain the sources they need for their research. Prof Beevor’s comment implies that Soviet history is now an impossible undertaking, whereas in fact our knowledge of the country deepens with every year.
Donald Filtzer
Emeritus professor of Russian history

• Civil wars are always dirty. Finland’s was no different from the ones in Spain, Russia, Poland etc (Letters, 16 February). The difference is you can talk about it – descendants of victims of white and red, historians, newspapers can express their point of view. The Polish coup d’etat in 1926 is still taboo which is even worse. Finland was allied with Germany, true. But they were in a rather uncomfortable position between the Nazis and Soviet Russia. The consequences of being conquered by Stalin were rather gruesome, much worse (for Finns) than being an ally of Hitler, so they chose the lesser evil.
Zofia Nowinska
Helsinki, Finland

• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com

• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters

Letters

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Poland, Russia and monumental distrust | Letters
Readers respond to Matthew Luxmoore’s article on the bitter conflict over a nation’s communist history

Letters

15, Jul, 2018 @6:39 PM

Article image
Why Finland allied itself with Nazi Germany | Letter
Letter: It was not to prevent Soviet conquest but to win back territories lost to the USSR, writes Geoffrey Roberts

Letters

23, Feb, 2018 @4:31 PM

Article image
Soviet monuments in Poland should be left to rot | Letter
Letter: The USSR rewrote history when it won control of Poland, and today’s nationalist backlash is the fruit of those lies, writes Christopher Cytera

Letters

19, Jul, 2018 @5:24 PM

Article image
Majority of Finns did not support Nazis | Letters
Letters: Norman Miller and Simon Surtees take issue with a letter that referred to Finland being an ally of Germany in the second world war

Letters

03, Jul, 2020 @2:49 PM

Article image
Finland’s egalitarian Eden has a dark side | Letters
Letters: Robert Lee and Julian Wells say Finnish history is far from perfect, while Mary Fawcett says the country should be proud of its egalitarian education system and David Rainbird says it is right to not squander its resources on pursuit of great-power status

Letters

15, Feb, 2018 @6:24 PM

Article image
Each day, President Zelenskiy reads my book on military history. I hope he heeds these warnings | Laurence Rees
The signs are good. Ukraine’s leader is avoiding the mistakes of the second world war – while Putin shows every sign of repeating them, says historian Laurence Rees

Laurence Rees

10, Feb, 2023 @9:41 AM

Article image
In Armando Iannucci’s film, Stalin gets a taste of his own disregard for facts | Letters
Letters: The film The Death of Stalin profoundly encodes in humour the poetics of the tragedy that is Stalin’s evil, writes Arthur Gibson. David Davis’s letter about the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact was ‘risible historical revisionism’, says Mark Boyle. Plus letters from Andrew Connell and Paul Flewers

Letters

18, Oct, 2017 @6:08 PM

Article image
How the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact helped win the war | Letters
Letters: Were it not for the pact, the Nazis would have probably captured Moscow in 1941 and much land beyond it, writes David Davis

Letters

17, Oct, 2017 @4:18 PM

Article image
Richard Strauss was no unrepentant Nazi | Letters
Letters: Among the later operas that Hitler didn’t listen to was, of course, Strauss’s pacifist Friedenstag (1936), with a libretto essentially by the Jewish Stefan Zweig

Letters

13, Apr, 2016 @6:11 PM

Article image
A new treaty will not end the war in Ukraine | Letters
Letters: Blaine Stothard says Russia has no intention of respecting existing treaties, so another one would be futile. Peter Wilson thinks the sheer power of Vladimir Putin’s narcissistic desperation should not be underestimated

Letters

14, Mar, 2022 @6:00 PM