Why Vladimir Putin may be in too deep in Syria to ditch Assad | Martin Chulov

Rather than moderate its stance on Syria, Russia has dug in, and there is no mood in Moscow to concede any ground to the US

Five years of political capital, over a million tonnes of weapons, tens of billions of dollars, Russia’s role as both dominant regional presence and rising global force – these are all at stake if Vladimir Putin abandons Syria’s leader.

This is the reckoning faced by the US secretary of state, Rex Tillerson, as he travels to Moscow to try to prise the Russian president away from his support of Bashar al-Assad in the aftermath of last week’s nerve agent attack on Khan Sheikhun.

Ahead of the first high-level summit between Russia and the US since the election of Donald Trump, hopes have been raised that the atrocity could be a catalyst for change in a country destroyed by war and failed by global politics.

Those hopes, however, are almost certain to be dashed. Throughout the conflict, and especially since the Kremlin doubled down on its support for Assad in September 2015, Russia has pursued a win-at-all-costs strategy, which has regularly defied the bounds of modern warfare and edged Assad’s regime towards a winning position on the battlefield.

Ruthless means have justified an end that Putin sees as being closer than ever. Since the chemical attack last Tuesday, blamed on Assad’s air force by the US, Britain, France and Syria’s opposition, Russia has given the regime cover. Both sides co-ordinated a response and stuck to it, blaming an al-Qaida stockpile for the carnage, despite no evidence in the town of Khan Sheikhun that any such thing existed there.

Rather than moderate its stance, Russia has dug in further, deploying diplomats to claim Washington is in bed with terrorists and mobilising state-run troll factories to shape the narrative – with the same vigour as they showed before the US presidential poll in November.

There is no mood in Moscow to concede any ground on Syria to the US – and a calculation that Tillerson won’t be pushing too hard anyway. Tillerson’s claim that Russia has “failed its commitment to the international community”, and the US belief that Moscow has been lax in supervising the withdrawal of Syria’s stockpiles of sarin, are likely to be tabled at the meeting on Wednesday.

Yet aside from intelligence that Tillerson may choose to declare in private, the Trump administration appears to have little leverage. The sarin strike, and Trump’s quick decision to bomb the regime airfield from where the jet carrying sarin apparently took off, has been good news for the troubled US leader, allowing him to put at least some daylight between himself and Putin at a time when the pair’s relationship is under immense scrutiny.

It has also given the Trump administration the chance to recast itself as a protector of global values, something the president had steadfastly eschewed in favour of homegrown US interests in his inaugural address in January.

A view remains strong around the region that the US strike may have surprised Putin and shown that the new US leader is more unpredictable than Assad thought, but that Syria was just a strongman moment – a chance for the newcomer to take a stool in the saloon.

There is little reason to think the Wednesday summit will lead to an escalation in tensions. On the contrary, there are many reasons to believe posturing will soon give way to business as usual. The depth of ties between Putin and Trump and their potential to influence global problems remain unknown, and are factors that the region’s leaders believe will stop the US launching a second strike or trying to broker a political solution in Syria.

In the absence of Trump’s predecessor, who largely disengaged from conflicts in the Middle East, Putin has manoeuvred Russia into a formidable position in the geopolitical space of the region. Assad is indebted to him, for the military support that he has brought to the war, which along with Iranian backing has ushered the Syrian leader closer to a military victory. Turkey has also allied with Moscow. The US has little room to move, even if Trump wanted it.

While Putin does not have things his own way in Syria, Assad remains too valuable to discard. If Tillerson is planning to appeal to Russia’s “sense of decency”, it is unlikely to work on a leader who has invested not only enormous amounts of blood and treasure in Syria, but increasingly the prestige of his presidency. Placing faith in either Putin or Trump as champions of humanity is seen by many in Syria as a losing bet.


Martin Chulov in Beirut

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Moscow: Syria airstrikes 'significant blow to Russian-US relations'
Missile launches in violation of international law, says Vladimir Putin spokesman Dmitry Peskov

Shaun Walker in Moscow

07, Apr, 2017 @4:12 PM

Article image
Syria will see US price for chemical attack as worth paying | Patrick Wintour
Whether Trump opts for a single retaliatory act or a more ambitious programme, Assad will think he is winning

Patrick Wintour Diplomatic editor

08, Apr, 2018 @4:43 PM

Article image
Syria crisis: Vladimir Putin under growing pressure

Russian president to be urged at G20 summit to come closer to accepting that Bashar al-Assad has to stand aside

Patrick Wintour and Kim Willsher in Paris

03, Sep, 2013 @6:47 AM

Article image
The Guardian view on Syria: Putin tests the west | Editorial
Editorial: As a new round of talks gets under way in Geneva, Russia seeks to cement its military gains in favour of the Assad dictatorship by securing UN validation


28, Nov, 2017 @7:05 PM

Article image
By bombing Assad base, Trump made his point. But what happens next?
Any reaction from Moscow will depend on whether Russia was complicit in Syria chemical attack, while Beijing may have to recalculate stance towards US

Julian Borger World affairs editor

07, Apr, 2017 @4:36 PM

Article image
Putin criticises west's strikes as defiant Assad praises Moscow
Syrian leader welcomes Russian delegation one day after missile strikes by US-led coalition

Andrew Roth in Moscow

15, Apr, 2018 @11:28 AM

Article image
Syria, Assad and what the west must do now | Letters
Letters: Our government should stop backing the US on Syria and call on Obama to start serious talks with Putin and others as a matter of urgency


09, Apr, 2015 @6:46 PM

Article image
Trump officials broadcast president's plan for Syria: wait for global response
HR McMaster, Nikki Haley and Rex Tillerson defend president’s missile strikes, emphasizing Russia’s role in ‘the solution’ and new priority to depose Assad

Alan Yuhas in San Francisco

09, Apr, 2017 @4:24 PM

Article image
'We have our plans': Vladimir Putin warns US against Syria military action
Russian president says it is too early to say what Russia will do but does not exclude supporting a UN resolution

Dan Roberts and Spencer Ackerman in Washington, Haroon Siddique and Angelique Chrisafis in Paris

04, Sep, 2013 @10:55 AM

Article image
Aleppo airstrikes restart as Russia announces major Syria offensive
First attacks in weeks hit rebel-held east of city, after Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin speak on phone about ‘regulating conflict’

Emma Graham-Harrison

15, Nov, 2016 @7:32 PM