US drone attacks 'counter-productive', former Obama security adviser claims

US reliance on drones to target terrorists undermines rule of law, is ineffective and has strategic drawbacks, argues Michael Boyle

The United States' use of drones is counter-productive, less effective than the White House claims, and is "encouraging a new arms race that will empower current and future rivals and lay the foundations for an international system that is increasingly violent", according to a study by one of President Obama's former security advisers.

Michael Boyle, who was on Obama's counter-terrorism group in the run-up to his election in 2008, said the US administration's growing reliance on drone technology was having "adverse strategic effects that have not been properly weighed against the tactical gains associated with killing terrorists".

Civilian casualties were likely to be far higher than had been acknowledged, he said.

In an article for the Chatham House journal International Affairs, Boyle said the conventional wisdom over the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) needed to be challenged.

He said there was an urgent need for greater transparency because most Americans remained "unaware of the scale of the drone programme ... and the destruction it has caused in their name".

US use of drones has soared during Obama's time in office, with the White House authorising attacks in at least four countries: Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia. It is estimated that the CIA and the US military have undertaken more than 300 drone strikes and killed about 2,500 people.

Administration officials have argued their use is lawful, though the Pentagon's most senior lawyer, Jeh Johnson, recently admitted that the US was heading for a "tipping point", beyond which it should no longer pursue terrorists by military means because the organisation that Congress authorised the military to pursue in 2001 had in effect been destroyed.

In his study, Boyle said Obama pledged to end the "war on terror" and to restore respect for the rule of law in US counter-terrorism policies.

"Instead, he has been just as ruthless and indifferent to the rule of law as his predecessor ... while President Bush issued a call to arms to defend 'civilisation' against the threat of terrorism, President Obama has waged his war on terror in the shadows, using drone strikes, special operations and sophisticated surveillance to fight a brutal covert war against al-Qaida and other Islamist networks."

Boyle, who teaches at La Salle University, Philadelphia, said the government claim that drones were an effective tool that minimised civilian casualties was "based on a highly selective and partial reading of the evidence".

He argues one of the reasons why the US has been "so successful in spinning the number of civilian casualties" is that it has reportedly adopted a controversial method for counting them: all military-age men in a strike zone are classed as militants unless clear evidence emerges to the contrary.

"The result of the 'guilt by association' approach has been a gradual loosening of the standards by which the US selects targets for drone strikes," his study says.

"The consequences can be seen in the targeting of mosques or funeral processions that kill non-combatants and tear at the social fabric of the regions where they occur. No one really knows the number of deaths caused by drones in these distant, sometimes ungoverned, lands."

Boyle questions the claim that drone strikes have been effective in killing so-called high-value targets, saying records suggested lower-ranked foot soldiers were the ones who had been hit in greatest numbers.

And he also said the strikes had a debilitating effect on local populations and their governments.

"Despite the fact that drone strikes are often employed against local enemies of the governments in Pakistan and Yemen, they serve as powerful signals of the regimes' helplessness and subservience to the United States and undermine the claim that these governments can be credible competitors for the loyalties of the population," he writes.

"The vast increase in the number of deaths of low-ranking operatives has deepened political resistance to the US programme in Pakistan, Yemen and other countries."

Last week, a judge in New York rejected an attempt by the New York Times to force the US government to disclose more information about its targeted killing of people that it believes have ties to terrorism, including American citizens.

Colleen McMahon, a district judge in Manhattan, said the Obama administration did not violate the law by refusing the newspaper's request for the legal justifications for targeted killings.

She said the government was not obliged to turn over materials the Times had sought under the federal Freedom of Information Act, even though it had such materials in its possession.


Nick Hopkins

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Letters: The immorality and illegality of drone warfare
Letters: There has been no public debate or consultation about drone warfare, but the use of these unmanned killing machines has grown rapidly

24, Oct, 2012 @8:00 PM

Article image
Drone attacks create terrorist safe havens, warns former CIA official

Indiscriminate use of drones in Middle East causes too many civilian casualties, warns former CIA counterterrorism head

Paul Harris in New York

05, Jun, 2012 @7:56 PM

Article image
ACLU takes CIA to court as agency denies existence of drone programme

Despite references by president and defence secretary, CIA has refused FOIA request on grounds it cannot confirm drone use

Paul Harris in New York

19, Sep, 2012 @2:17 PM

Article image
How lawyers sign off on drone attacks | Pratap Chatterjee

Pratap Chatterjee: Strict protocols supposedly govern conduct of Obama's secret unmanned air war, but poor intelligence still causes lethal errors

Pratap Chatterjee

15, Jun, 2011 @10:00 PM

Article image
US drone strike in Pakistan kills Taliban leader Mullah Mansoor
Death of Mullah Omar’s successor in Balochistan province likely to have major effect on US-Pakistani relations

Jon Boone in Islamabad and Sune Engel Rasmussen in Kabul

22, May, 2016 @11:40 AM

Article image
Drone wars and state secrecy – how Barack Obama became a hardliner

The US president has been likened by former supporters to 'George Bush on steroids'. Paul Harris reports

Paul Harris

02, Jun, 2012 @7:56 PM

Article image
Obama regrets drone strike that killed hostages but hails US for transparency
US counter-terrorism operation in January killed two hostages – American doctor Warren Weinstein and Italian citizen Giovanni Lo Porto

Paul Lewis and Spencer Ackerman in New York and Jon Boone in Islamabad

23, Apr, 2015 @6:41 PM

Article image
Drone warfare's deadly civilian toll: a very personal view | James Jeffrey

James Jeffrey: I was minutes from ordering a drone strike on a Taliban insurgent – until I realised I was watching an Afghan child at play

James Jeffrey

19, Sep, 2012 @8:36 PM

Article image
UK should campaign for international ban on autonomous killer drones
Fromer GCHQ boss says existing drone technology poses no ‘convincing ethical problems’ but there must be safeguards

Owen Bowcott

21, Oct, 2014 @11:04 PM

Article image
Fewer deaths from drone strikes in 2013 after Obama policy change
Strikes this year are estimated to have killed up to 271 people, down from 2012 figure of between 505 and 532

Spencer Ackerman in Washington

31, Dec, 2013 @8:01 PM