Biden’s Taiwan vow creates confusion not clarity – and raises China tensions

President’s blunt response appears to undercut US ‘strategic ambiguity’ on Taiwan as White House forced to walk back remarks

The somewhat routine press conference in Tokyo was winding down when the question came. “Are you willing to get involved militarily to defend Taiwan if it comes to that?”

Many past American presidents would have deflected, demurred, declined to give a straight answer. Not Joe Biden. “Yes,” he replied bluntly, adding: “That’s the commitment we made.”

Reporters at the scene were taken aback. Sebastian Smith, the White House correspondent for Agence France-Presse, tweeted that Biden’s answer “really raised adrenaline levels in that palace briefing room right now. Next we all get to try and explain what it all actually means.”

One possible meaning is that America has abandoned its long-held position of “strategic ambiguity” on Taiwan. But Biden may have delivered not so much strategic clarity as strategic confusion. That would be on brand for a president who has made a habit of speaking without a diplomatic filter.

China considers the democratic island of Taiwan its territory under its “one-China” principle, and says it is the most sensitive and important issue in its relationship with Washington.

This is where strategic ambiguity comes in. While the US is required by law to provide Taiwan with the means to defend itself, it has never directly promised to intervene militarily in a conflict with China – but also never promised to stay out.

This deliberate vagueness has – so far – helped deter China from invading Taiwan while also helping deter the self-ruled island from declaring full independence. Either scenario would trigger a major geopolitical crisis.

Last year, Kurt Campbell, the US policy coordinator for the Indo-Pacific, defended the principle of strategic ambiguity, saying there were “significant downsides” to “strategic clarity”.

But Biden has already shown himself less comfortable with shades of grey than his predecessors, insisting on a full withdrawal of US forces from Afghanistan last year despite the ensuing chaos and collapse than enabled the Taliban to regain power. He has also been pushing the envelope on Taiwan for some time.

In an ABC News interview last August, he appeared to put Taiwan in the same category as other countries with which Washington has explicit defence commitments, such as South Korea.

Then, in October, the president told a CNN town hall, “Yes, we have a commitment to do that,” when asked if the US would come to the defence of Taiwan. Bonnie Glaser, a Taiwan expert at the German Marshall Fund of the United States thinktank in Washington, called Biden’s remark a “gaffe” and said it was “patently not true” that the US has a commitment to defend Taiwan.

Since then Biden has reiterated America’s “rock-solid” commitment to Taiwan, the influential congressman Adam Schiff has urged the Biden administration to be less ambiguous about the issue, and Antony Blinken, the secretary of state, has warned that the US and its allies would take unspecified “action” if China were to use force to alter the status quo over Taiwan.

After Biden made the remark at a joint press conference on Monday with the Japanese prime minister, Fumio Kishida, an aide said the president’s statement represented no change in the longstanding American stance to the island. A source told CNN that Biden meant providing weapons, not deploying boots on the ground.

But with the Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson, Wang Wenbin, expressing “strong dissatisfaction and resolute opposition” to Biden’s comments, such clean-ups look increasingly untenable.

Richard Haass, president of the Council on Foreign Relations thinktank in Washington, tweeted: “This is the third time Potus has spoken out in favor of strategic clarity on Taiwan and third time WH staff has tried to walk it back. Better to embrace it as new US stance, one that is fully consistent with one-China policy but that alters how US will go about implementing it.”

Glaser, of the the German Marshall Fund, added in a Twitter post: “A senior official from the Biden administration should give a comprehensive speech on US policy toward Taiwan. The confusion and misstatements are more likely to undermine deterrence than strengthen it.”

What may have partly changed the calculus is Russia’s unprovoked and disastrous invasion of Ukraine. Some in Washington believe that the Chinese president, Xi Jinping, is coming to realise that he underestimated America’s willingness to lead and underestimated the resolve and unity of the west. The struggles of the Russian military suggest that the Chinese military would not have cakewalk.

On Monday, Biden said he hoped the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, would pay a price for his invasion of Ukraine in part to show China what it would face if it were to invade Taiwan.

He may feel emboldened because, so far, there has been little downside to speaking his mind unscripted on Ukraine (or for the US government’s approach of radical transparency). In March, in response to a reporter’s question at the White House, he said of Putin: “I think he is a war criminal.”

The then White House press secretary, Jen Psaki, noting that a legal review was still under way at the state department, explained: “He was speaking from his heart.”

There was bigger gaffe later that month when Biden upended a carefully crafted speech in Warsaw with an ad lib at the end, again regarding Putin: “For God’s sake, this man cannot remain in power.” But after a kerfuffle for 48 hours, the controversy more or less dissipated, with some defending Biden as a truth-teller who cuts through speechwriters’ waffle.

Jon Meacham, a presidential historian and occasional adviser to Biden, has described the president as “like an upside down iceberg” – mostly visible without much mystery. Valerie Biden Owens, his sister and longtime campaign manger, told the Guardian in a recent interview: He doesn’t have gaffes. He speaks the truth. Like, hello, surprise, I just said what was true! … You see what you get with Joe.”

This, perhaps, is one of the few things that he and his predecessor Donald Trump share in common: a tendency to plain-speaking that many find authentic and refreshing after a generation of slick, focus group-manufactured politicians. It proved an asset for both on the campaign trail.

But as Trump demonstrated often, it is a high wire act full of perils when global security hangs in the balance.


David Smith in Washington

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Fears Biden’s Taiwan comments may raise tensions despite rowback
President said US would ‘get involved ’ if China attacked Taiwan, which some saw as policy shift

Helen Davidson in Taipei

25, May, 2022 @3:35 PM

Article image
US would defend Taiwan if attacked by China, says Joe Biden
President says US’s responsibility to protect island is ‘even stronger’ after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine

Justin McCurry in Tokyo, Vincent Ni and agencies

23, May, 2022 @11:26 PM

Article image
China warns against ‘wrong signals’ as Biden suggests US would defend Taiwan
Administration insists there is no change of policy after president says US has ‘a commitment’ to defend island

Vincent Ni and agencies

22, Oct, 2021 @9:52 AM

Article image
Xi Jinping expected in talks to tell Joe Biden to ‘step back’ on Taiwan
War of words begins ahead of meeting, with US president warned Taiwan is China’s ‘ultimate red line’

Julian Borger in Washington and Vincent Ni, China affairs correspondent

15, Nov, 2021 @10:53 AM

Article image
Xi Jinping tells Joe Biden not to ‘play with fire’ over Taiwan in two-hour call
US president reiterates opposition to undermining peace in Taiwan amid tension over potential Pelosi trip

Vincent Ni, and Joan E Greve in Washington

29, Jul, 2022 @1:35 AM

Article image
US and Chinese officials discuss Biden-Xi meeting amid Taiwan friction
Two leaders raised possibility of in-person encounter when they last talked by phone in late July, US official confirms

Julian Borger in Washington

12, Aug, 2022 @7:39 PM

Article image
Is China stepping up its ambition to supplant US as top superpower?
Analysis: Joe Biden has cleared the decks to focus on China. But how imminent is the danger?

Patrick Wintour Diplomatic editor

22, Sep, 2021 @9:00 PM

Article image
Donald Trump and China on dangerous collision course, say experts
Report says ties between the two nuclear-armed countries could deteriorate into an economic or military confrontation

Tom Phillips in Beijing

07, Feb, 2017 @3:30 AM

Article image
Will China turn Taiwan into the next Crimea?
US support for Taiwan may prove red rag to bullish China given trade war and military rivalry

Simon Tisdall

03, Apr, 2018 @12:12 PM

Article image
Blinken clashes with China over US support for Taiwan
Beijing warns against interference, as US secretary of state also urges China to meet climate responsibilities

Patrick Wintour in Rome

31, Oct, 2021 @3:32 PM