Win for Ted Cruz as supreme court strikes campaign contribution limit

Conservative majority rules in favor of rightwing Texas senator but Elena Kagan warns ‘quid pro quo corruption’ the likely result

The six conservatives who dominate the US supreme court ruled in favour of the hard-right Texas senator Ted Cruz in a case seeking to remove limits on campaign finance spending, in a ruling that one dissenting justice said would open the door to “quid pro quo corruption”.

In Federal Election Commission v Ted Cruz for Senate, the Republican senator challenged limits on the use of post-election contributions to pay back loans by candidates to their own campaigns.

During his 2018 re-election victory over Beto O’Rourke, Cruz loaned his campaign $260,000, which was $10,000 over the limit for repayments that were allowable using donations received after the election. The limits were set by the 2002 Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, widely known as McCain-Feingold after the senators who steered it into law. Cruz was repaid $250,000 and sued in federal court to regain the rest of his loan.

Observers argued that Cruz deliberately overspent by a small amount in order to sue to overturn the law and therefore be allowed to recoup a much larger amount, $545,000, than he never recovered after loaning his 2012 campaign more than a million dollars.

According to the new ruling written by the chief justice, John Roberts, and backed by the other five conservatives on the nine-member court, “The government has not shown that [the law] furthers a permissible anticorruption goal, rather than the impermissible objective of simply limiting the amount of money in politics.”

Critics say Roberts has led a court determined to remove all limits on money in politics, thereby corrupting the American political process itself.

Particularly at issue is Citizens United v Federal Elections Commission, a 2010 ruling which said private entities have the same free speech rights as individuals and therefore should not face limits on campaign donations. Roberts explicitly referred to the case in his decision.

“This court has recognised only one permissible ground for restricting political speech: the prevention of ‘quid pro quo’ corruption or its appearance,” he wrote.

The liberal justice Elena Kagan, in dissent, argued that the ruling would enable precisely such “quid pro quo corruption”.

“All the money does is enrich the candidate personally at a time when he can return the favor – by a vote, a contract, an appointment,” she wrote.

“It takes no political genius to see the heightened risk of corruption – the danger of ‘I’ll make you richer and you’ll make me richer’ arrangements between donors and officeholders.”

Ian Milhiser, senior correspondent at Vox and author of The Agenda: How a Republican Supreme Court is Reshaping America, wrote that the six Republican appointees on the court had “escalated” a long-running “war with campaign finance laws” with a ruling that would be “a boon to wealthy candidates”.

“Now that this limit on loan repayments has been struck down, lawmakers with sufficiently creative accountants may be able to use such loans to give themselves a steady income stream from campaign donors.”

In return, Milhiser said, candidates “may be inclined to reward donors who help them recoup the cost of personal loans”.

Richard Painter, a former White House ethics chief under the Republican president George W Bush, tweeted about how he saw the implications of the ruling: “Loan your campaign lots of money, get elected, then fundraise so people can buy favors by donating money that goes right into your personal bank account. That’s bribery of a federal official, not free speech.”

“This court needs more justices,” he added, referring to the growing calls to increase the size of the court in order to remedy the rightwing lurch exemplified by the draft ruling indicating the imminent fall of the right to abortion.


Martin Pengelly in New York

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Ted Cruz threatens to burn John Boehner’s book over criticisms
Former Republican House speaker called the Texas senator ‘Lucifer in the flesh’

Martin Pengelly in New York

15, Apr, 2021 @4:23 PM

Article image
Republican Ted Cruz introduces bill to block US supreme court expansion
Texas senator claims court dominated 6-3 by conservatives after ruthless GOP power plays must remain ‘independent’

Martin Pengelly in New York

23, Mar, 2023 @1:03 PM

Article image
When is a campaign not a campaign? When it's a Super Pac
Nominally independent committees that can raise unlimited amounts for their preferred candidate are set to play a huge role in the 2016 presidential election

Ben Jacobs in Washington

17, May, 2015 @11:00 AM

Article image
Cruz: Biden promise to put Black woman on supreme court is racial discrimination
Justices have been chosen on grounds of identity before, as Trump did when he picked a woman to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Martin Pengelly in New York

20, Feb, 2022 @4:50 PM

Article image
Trump convention manager accuses Cruz campaign of 'Gestapo tactics'
Paul Manafort said Texas senator is ‘not playing by the rules’ as Donald Trump claimed Cruz campaign bribed Colorado delegates with ‘all sorts of goodies’

Alan Yuhas

10, Apr, 2016 @4:57 PM

Article image
Ted Cruz wants two-term limit for senators – and a third term for himself
Texas senator says he ‘never said I’m going to unilaterally comply’ with his own proposed restriction

Martin Pengelly in New York

05, Feb, 2023 @6:06 PM

Article image
Cruz denies alliance with Kasich ahead of Indiana primary – as it happened
Cruz’s new vice-presidential running mate and the Republican frontrunner trade barbs as upcoming Indiana primary could be last chance stop Trump

Scott Bixby (now) and Tom McCarthy (earlier)

29, Apr, 2016 @2:19 AM

Article image
Capitol attack prompts top US firms to pull funding for leading Republicans
Companies such as Citigroup, Marriott and Blue Cross Blue Shield are deserting lawmakers who backed Trump’s bid to overturn Biden’s victory

Adam Gabbatt

12, Jan, 2021 @9:00 AM

Article image
Early Ted Cruz funds blow past Romney 2012 pace in sign of mega-money race
Newfound donor network helps Cruz double Romney’s haul in first week of 2012 campaign and outstrip his small-donor total from first 11 weeks in only eight days

Paul Lewis and Russ Choma in Washington

16, Apr, 2015 @7:58 PM

Article image
Ted Cruz erased Trump's Iowa lead by spending millions on voter targeting
Filings reveal Texas senator paid $3m to profiling company as hedge-fund billionaire seeded advantage in ‘military escalation’ of data-powered campaign

Harry Davies

01, Feb, 2016 @9:39 PM