A political populism far removed from Donald Trump | Letters

Not all populist movements are negative and destructive, writes Dr Stephen Blomfield, although David Marquand thinks populism tends to flourish out of dysfunctional political systems. Plus letters from David Redshaw and Derek Heptinstall

Andy Beckett presents an entirely negative picture of populism (This is a moment of truth for rightwing populists – but don’t celebrate yet, 23 October). There are many unfortunate examples in our present age of how destructive populist movements can be. However, he appears unaware of earlier and more positive episodes of populism, in particular the founding of the People’s party in 1891 in the US. This became a significant political party, gaining 8% of the popular vote when it fielded a candidate in the 1892 presidential election.

The origins of the People’s party, also known as the Populist party, lay in the exploitation of sharecroppers and tenant farmers by business monopolies and the banking elite. These agrarian workers had been plunged into debt, after taking on loans to fund investments in new farming equipment, when they were hit by droughts and falling crop prices, together with extortionate loan terms and interest rates.

The Populist party agitated for massive political reforms, which included the recognition of unions, regulation of the railway industry, the direct election of senators, progressive income tax, and women’s suffrage. These ideas were considered radical at the time, and still are!

The current problem with populism is that most of it is not genuine, but is either generated by cynical groups with a hidden interest, or is hijacked by unscrupulous politicians for ulterior purposes. However, there still are populist movements that serve a higher purpose. Be careful not to diss populism per se, as it has a distinguished pedigree. It is the pseudo-populists who need to be challenged and brought to heel.
Dr Stephen Blomfield

• Andy Beckett’s piece on populism was a brilliant discussion of one of the most pressing questions of our time. I only have one small quibble. He says we should remember that populists do sometimes “get re-elected”.

But that’s not the point. Populism is democracy’s ugly sister. It flourishes when the primordial democratic promise of political equality is negated by a dysfunctional political system. The answer is the maximum possible diffusion of power. It’s not an accident that federal systems are less likely to be infected by the populist virus than centralised ones. A radical overhaul of our dysfunctional political system is the only way out of the populist trap.
David Marquand
Penarth, South Glamorgan

• I disagree that the “predictable and cautious politics” of the 1990s and 2000s provoked an outburst of populism. It was because these political periods were unstable that there was a backlash. The administrations of John Major and Tony Blair produced boom and bust, two massive recessions with widespread unemployment and widening inequality.

The Blair government was still essentially Thatcherite even though it tried to fiddle around the edges to make things a bit better for the least affluent. The inevitable crunch came in 2007 precisely because banking and housing remained unreformed. Then came David Cameron, George Osborne and austerity. Populism is the muddled reaction against 40 years of Thatcherism.
David Redshaw
Gravesend, Kent

• David Runciman highlights the need for politicians with experience and judgment when faced with a crisis like the Covid-19 pandemic (Boris Johnson is learning that in politics you cannot simply ‘follow the science’, 24 October). The problem is that our pluralist democratic system is not designed to produce politicians with the wisdom and practical experience to use facts in a relevant way, but only ones that can gain resonance at the ballot box. Both Boris Johnson and Donald Trump exemplify the deficiency.
Derek Heptinstall
Westgate-on-Sea, Kent


The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
What led to Trump and what will follow Biden | Letters
Letters: John Marriott says Biden must succeed where Blair failed, Richard Yoell points out that Obama was cursed with a hostile and belligerent Senate, Philip Stenning is appalled by the idea of ‘tub-thumping left populism’, and Adam Hart argues that Covid-19 has forced neoliberal regimes to re-evaluate


16, Nov, 2020 @4:32 PM

Article image
Progressive forces of the left can win by working together | Letters
Letters: Readers on the need for electoral reform, proportional representation, and how the Tories are prolonging their dominance


09, Nov, 2020 @4:59 PM

Article image
The need to find a fairer system of taxing and spending in the UK | Letters
Letters from Terry Kelly, Ruth Lister, Dr David Griffith, David Beard, Peter Fieldman and Richard Cooper in response to Guardian reports and Paul Mason’s article


08, May, 2017 @6:19 PM

Article image
Keir Starmer’s faith in Nato is misplaced at best | Letters
Letters: Frank Jackson says the Labour leader’s eulogy for Nato is a travesty of history, while Richard Ashwell wonders if he understands what being opposed to war means. Plus letters from Dr Alan Lafferty and Blaine Stothard


14, Feb, 2022 @6:07 PM

Lambeth cutting family centre funds | Letters
Letters: All councils have to react to government cuts – the test is how, says David Hopkins. Plus Dr Harry Harmer considers austerity’s legacy


04, Feb, 2019 @6:29 PM

Article image
The drive for Scottish independence is distinct from nationalism | Letters
Letters: In response to an article by Rafael Behr, Julie Darling thinks he confuses support for independence with nationalism, Alastair McLeish says the reason he votes SNP has nothing to do with fanaticism, and Richard Middleton thinks Scotland already feels like a separate political entity. Plus letters from Brian Caddick and Roger Read


16, Feb, 2020 @6:12 PM

Article image
Trump’s interference in UK political affairs | Letters
Letters: Bhikhu Parekh takes issue with the US president’s ‘aggressive’ interference, David Wardrop recalls Evel Knievel’s advice on the EU, while John Amos wonders why Nigel Farage is on air


01, Nov, 2019 @5:51 PM

Article image
Donald Trump, King Victor Emmanuel III and interfering with democracy | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to articles by Richard Wolffe and Jonathan Freedland


10, Sep, 2018 @5:50 PM

Article image
Could tactical voting save Britain from the Tories? | Letters
Letters: John Lynch and Declan O’Neill respond to an article on how tactical voting, as seen in the recent byelections, could reshape British politics. Plus a letter from David Smith


26, Jun, 2022 @4:42 PM

Article image
Political opportunism feeding rising tensions with Iran | Letters
Letters: Readers share their views on relations between Britain, the US and Iran


22, Jul, 2019 @4:47 PM