Social media backlash forces Trump to find new ways to spread his message

Twitter, Reddit and other platforms are taking action against the president’s rhetoric. The alternatives have far less reach

Donald Trump’s campaign manager sent a warning to Twitter last month, weeks after the social media company first took steps to add labels and context to the president’s often inflammatory tweets.

“Hey @twitter, your days are numbered,” Brad Parscale wrote in a tweet, linking to one of his posts on the much lesser-known social media site Parler.

But Twitter did not appear to think much of Parscale’s warning. Less than a week later, the platform added a public interest notice to another Trump tweet for violating its policy against abusive behavior. Days after that, Reddit banned its largest pro-Trump subreddit over hate speech, and the streaming video platform Twitch temporarily suspended the president’s channel for violating its policy against “hateful conduct”.

As the president’s rhetoric on issues including vote by mail and the Black Lives Matter protests attracts more and more controversy, the companies’ escalating actions have led the president and his advisers to lash out against the social media giants. But the response is also forcing Trump and his campaign to consider alternative ways to spread their message before the presidential election in November. For a president who rose to power partly on the back of social media, it is a remarkable reversal of fortune.

Trump signed an executive order targeting social media companies in late May, days after Twitter added a fact-check to two of his tweets about voting by mail. The order was aimed at rolling back a legal shield for online platforms contained in the Communications Decency Act of 1996, and the justice department has since issued a recommendation urging Congress to repeal parts of the law.

But those actions do not seem to have deterred social media companies in their effort to crack down on hate speech when it comes from the American president.

Snap, the company that makes Snapchat, announced last month that it would no longer promote Trump’s posts on its Discover channel because it did not want to “amplify voices who incite racial violence and injustice by giving them free promotion on Discover”.

Even Facebook, the social media company that has generally been most lenient with the president, said it would start removing posts that incite violence or seek to suppress voting, with no exceptions for politicians. Days before that, Facebook took down Trump campaign ads that included a symbol associated with the Nazis, saying the ads violated the company’s policy against “organized hate”.

Those decisions come as Facebook continues to face pressure from employees and advertisers to crack down on hate speech, with many critics saying the company’s recent steps do not go far enough to address the issue.

Facebook employees staged a virtual walkout last month over the company’s refusal to remove one of Trump’s posts about the recent protests against police brutality, and more than 300 companies have now joined an advertising boycott in response to the company’s policies on misinformation and hate speech.

The Trump campaign is looking at alternative ways to reach voters. A number of Trump’s advisers and allies have now joined Parler, the Twitter rival, and the campaign has increasingly used its own smartphone app to provide supporters with news and entertainment that is favorable to the president.

“We have always been worried about Twitter and Facebook taking us offline and this serves as a backup,” Parscale said of the campaign app in an interview with Reuters.

But other platforms simply cannot match the reach of social media giants like Facebook and Twitter.

The CEO of Parler, who has described the platform as “an open town square with no censorship”, said late last month that the number of Parler users had quickly climbed to 1.5 million. In comparison, Facebook and Twitter have 175.4 million and 53.5 million US users respectively, according to the market research firm eMarketer.

“There is no replacement for Facebook. There basically is no replacement for Twitter,” said David Karpf, a professor in the school of media and public affairs at the George Washington University. “If they move to these smaller sites, what they’re going to find is, ‘Well, this doesn’t have the audience.’”

Gautam Hans, a professor at Vanderbilt Law School, added that social media companies touting a “no censorship” policy had previously become overrun with violent and hateful rhetoric, which could quickly force Parler to develop a content moderation policy. “And then basically you’re back where you were four months ago on Twitter,” Hans said. “You’re not going to be able to avoid these problems. They’re unavoidable.”

The social media companies’ repeated run-ins with Trump have only underscored the need for platforms to establish uniform rules around hate speech, Hans argued. “I think they thought they could get out of this situation in some meaningful, principled way without having to make a hard call,” Hans said. “I think the last month has demonstrated that that’s not going to happen.”

In the end, the recent steps taken by social media giants may be most important in terms of what they say about how those companies move forward in a world where politicians increasingly interact with voters through virtual platforms.

“Those are meaningful steps, and it’s worth applauding them,” Karpf said. “I don’t think they’re going to change the outcome of the election in meaningful ways, but when social media companies start taking responsibility for the platforms they provide and the activity on those platforms and take some authority for the power that they have, that is a good thing to see.”


Joan E Greve in Washington DC

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Opinion divided over Trump's ban from social media
Actions spark debate on free speech and whether chief executives of tech firms are fit to act as judge and jury

Alex Hern

11, Jan, 2021 @6:17 PM

Article image
Blocked: how the internet turned on Donald Trump
From Facebook and Twitter to Reddit and Amazon, tech firms are moving to silence the president, and his QAnon supporters

Alex Hern

12, Jan, 2021 @3:05 PM

Article image
Chris Whitty's abuse is a symptom of social media out of control | Simon Jenkins
Debate only works if it is disciplined by ethics. The failure to regulate the digital revolution is the great mistake of our age, says Guardian columnist Simon Jenkins

Simon Jenkins

04, Feb, 2021 @4:43 PM

Article image
Welcome to the social media election that never was
So far, the social media strategies used by the main political parties in this year’s general election have been routine, predictable and overly cautious

David Fletcher

27, Apr, 2015 @1:05 PM

Article image
Trump's vote fraud claims go viral on social media despite curbs
President’s posts are top on Facebook as efforts to stop misinformation about election prove ineffective

Alex Hern Technology editor

10, Nov, 2020 @6:43 PM

Article image
Biden article row shows how US election is testing Facebook and Twitter
Online giants felt forced to take unprecedented action as they struggle with role during divisive presidential battle

Alex Hern UK technology editor

15, Oct, 2020 @2:30 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on social media: facts need to be labelled as facts | Editorial
Editorial: Facebook in particular has to be wary of the dangers of misinformation. Otherwise social media will end up an echo chamber for post-truth politics


15, Nov, 2016 @7:27 PM

Article image
The Guardian view of Trump's populism: weaponised and silenced by social media | Editorial
Editorial: Democracy has been threatened by commercialising the swift spread of controversy and lies for political advantage


15, Jan, 2021 @6:24 PM

Article image
The social media election: how campaigners can avoid painful gaffes
While political parties are keen to woo young voters via social media, to date they’ve had a rocky ride on the platform. Allan Blair and Ned Hodge reveal the pitfalls to avoid

Allan Blair and Ned Hodge

06, Feb, 2015 @10:00 AM

Article image
Facebook removes hundreds of fake profiles tied to pro-Trump group
Social network says accounts tied to Turning Point USA sought to influence conversations by flooding news articles with comments

Kari Paul

08, Oct, 2020 @10:19 PM