Elizabeth Warren's DNA release proves it: she's running for president

Pundits say the senator’s revelation of her ancestry – a rebuke to Trump – is a sure sign of her 2020 plans

More conclusively than it tells us anything about her genetic heritage, Senator Elizabeth Warren’s neatly choreographed release of her own DNA analysis makes one thing abundantly clear: she’s running for the White House in 2020.

That’s the primary takeaway from political pundits in the wake of a slick, five-minute campaign video, in which the firebrand liberal from Massachusetts openly discussed her family background, specifically her Native American ancestry. Technically it was released by her Senate campaign against the Republican Geoff Diehl, but it’s clear it has nothing to do with that race, which Warren is expected to win handily.

Instead, the release was a direct rebuke to Donald Trump, who has made a habit of mocking her claims of Native American ancestry by referring to her by the racist moniker “Pocahontas”. Warren’s move is a clear gambit to get out in front of a controversy that has dogged her political career and could be a big stumbling block in the future.

David Axelrod, a top adviser in Barack Obama’s campaigns and administration, called the ad “extraordinary” and said it meant Warren was “100% running” for president in 2020.

The New York Times political correspondent Jonathan Martin said on Twitter: “It’s not ‘I’m running’, it’s ‘I’m running and won’t be swift-boated’,” referring to the discredited ads questioning John Kerry’s military service that ran during the 2004 presidential election. “Swift-boating” subsequently entered the American political lexicon as a term for a campaign of disingenuous or false attacks on a candidate’s background.

What’s also clear is that Democrats like Warren are still stress-testing strategies for challenging Trump’s signature blend of post-truth and personal insult-based politics.

Because what the ad, and the DNA test behind it, doesn’t do is offer any useful insights into Warren’s background. The analysis, conducted by the respected geneticist Carlos Bustamante, found with high confidence that Warren had a Native American relative six to 10 generations back, which, as the Boston Globe calculated, would mean her DNA registered somewhere between 1/32nd and 1/1024th Native American.

That is far too distant an ancestry to claim tribal status in the US, which Warren has never done, but it says nothing about the degree to which a family lore of Native American ancestors was part of her upbringing in rural Oklahoma. People don’t take DNA tests before they decide what stories to tell their children about their family history – and in the ad, Warren suggests that is where her quite limited claims of Native ancestry originate.

“When my momma was 19, and my daddy was 20, they eloped,” she said of her parents, because her father’s family did not approve of his marriage to Warren’s mother, “because my mother’s family … was part Native American”.

When DNA testing for tribal status, the tests administered to join indigenous nations check paternity to actual tribal members, and are not the same as the autosomal DNA inferences made by popular ancestry services like 23andme or Ancestry.com.

Some in the Native American community were frustrated with the ad for dignifying Trump’s disrespectful “Pocahontas” attacks with a response.

“I wish [Warren] hadn’t released her DNA results,” said Gyasi Ross, a speaker, author and regular commenter on issues affecting Native peoples in the US. “I’m glad she found out who she is for her own knowing. But now she made the ‘does she have any REMOTE Native ancestry’ spectacle part of her campaign,” Ross said in a tweet. “She turned Native ancestry into a campaign prop.”

Some critics also expressed frustration that Warren’s divulgence gives credit to the controversial idea that a person can be some measurable percentage of this or that ethnicity – since ethnic groups have always been porous and intermixed.

“Blood quantum [is] an institution of colonialism, & we don’t do this for other races,” said Graham Lee Brewer, a tribal member and reporter on Indian Country in Oklahoma.

In its details, Bustamante’s analysis (and those done by commercial DNA testing companies) are much more nuanced than saying a person is some percentage of this or that race or ethnicity. But often the findings get reduced into simpler and scientifically discredited ideas of so-called “blood quantum”.

The Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway called Bustamante’s report “junk science” early on Monday.

Unclear from Warren’s announcement is exactly what effect it would have in a potential 2020 matchup with Trump. The president’s racist name-calling towards Warren has never been about Native ancestry per se, but rather a useful way to intimate that she is a liar and an opportunist. “Who cares?” Trump said of the results early on Monday.

Indeed, Trump might seize on the possible low-water mark of 1/1024 Native ancestry from Bustamante’s analysis the next time he’s looking to make broadsides at Warren’s background.

It’s also conceivable that he won’t change his attacks at all. After all, Trump’s “birther” attacks on Barack Obama pushed a sitting president to release his long-form birth certificate, only to have Trump continue to wonder aloud years later if Obama really was born in the US.


Jamiles Lartey

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Elizabeth Warren's strong debate performance inspires best fundraising day yet
Elizabeth Warren was roundly declared the victor of an often tempestuous Democratic debate, reviving her campaign after slipping in polls

Oliver Milman in New York

20, Feb, 2020 @4:36 PM

Article image
Elizabeth Warren's confrontation with Bernie Sanders caps testy debate night
Warren appears to reject Sanders’ offer of handshake after all six Democratic contenders spar on foreign policy, healthcare and who can beat Trump

Daniel Strauss in Des Moines

15, Jan, 2020 @5:05 AM

Article image
John Legend adds star power to Elizabeth Warren's primary push
The senator has an A-list pitchman but still faces an uphill task with South Carolina’s majority black Democratic voters

Daniel Strauss in Charleston, South Carolina

27, Feb, 2020 @8:30 PM

Article image
Elizabeth Warren's life story proves she's right to put childcare first | Jill Filipovic
The senator recognizes how lucky she was to have help raising her kids in a country that leaves mothers hanging

Jill Filipovic

22, Feb, 2019 @11:00 AM

Article image
Iowa Nice: hawkeyed experts say Elizabeth Warren hit ground running
Ask those who know in the first-in-the-nation state and they agree: the Massachusetts Democrat is an early frontrunner

Ben Jacobs in Des Moines, Iowa

27, Jan, 2019 @6:00 AM

Article image
Don't call Elizabeth Warren's campaign dead yet | Moira Donegan
Win or lose, her anger and her passion have inspired millions, and no Democrat will win the White House without her guidance and her help

Moira Donegan

28, Feb, 2020 @8:00 AM

Article image
'Let's do this!': Megan Rapinoe endorses Elizabeth Warren for president
Soccer star praises Warren for being ‘bold and real’ as SI Sportsperson of the Year posts video of call with candidate

Victoria Bekiempis

14, Dec, 2019 @3:02 PM

Article image
Elizabeth Warren endorses Joe Biden for president as Democrats unite
Senator who exited race last month says, ‘We can’t afford to let Trump continue to endanger lives and livelihoods of Americans’

Lauren Gambino in Washington

15, Apr, 2020 @4:06 PM

Article image
Elizabeth Warren is running – here are 10 others who may seek the Democratic nomination
Thrusting young senators, a former vice-president … and Bernie Sanders again? We profile some of the likely 2020 contenders

Martin Pengelly

31, Dec, 2018 @5:09 PM

Article image
Who is running for president? The full list of 2020 Democratic candidates
Almost two dozen Democratic candidates - and a few Republicans - are vying to be the one to take on Donald Trump in the 2020 race for the White House

Lauren Gambino and Sam Morris

01, Feb, 2020 @3:09 PM