Leaked documents reveal secretive influence of corporate cash on politics

Sealed Wisconsin court documents from Scott Walker investigation expose extent of corporate influence on democratic process rarely seen by the public

The pervasive influence of corporate cash in the democratic process, and the extraordinary lengths to which politicians, lobbyists and even judges go to solicit money, are laid bare in sealed court documents leaked to the Guardian.

The John Doe files amount to 1,500 pages of largely unseen material gathered in evidence by prosecutors investigating alleged irregularities in political fundraising. Last year the Wisconsin supreme court ordered that all the documents should be destroyed, though a set survived that has now been obtained by the news organisation.

The files open a window on a world that is very rarely glimpsed by the public, in which millions of dollars are secretly donated by major corporations and super-wealthy individuals to third-party groups in an attempt to sway elections. They speak to a visceral theme of the 2016 presidential cycle: the distortion of American democracy by big business that has been slammed by both Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders.


In a case that is the subject of a petition currently in front of the US supreme court, five Wisconsin prosecutors carried out a deep investigation into what they suspected were criminal campaign-finance violations by the campaign committee of Scott Walker, Wisconsin governor and former Republican presidential candidate. Known as the “John Doe investigation”, the inquiry has been a lightning rod for bitter disputes between conservatives and progressives for years.

In July 2015 the state’s supreme court halted the investigation, saying the prosecutors had misunderstood campaign finance law and as a result had picked on people and groups “wholly innocent of any wrongdoing”. Highly unusually, the court also ordered that all the evidence assembled by the prosecutors be destroyed and later held under seal.

Among the documents are several court filings from the case, as well as hundreds of pages of email exchanges obtained by the prosecutors under subpoena. The emails involve conversations concerning Walker, his top aides, conservative lobbyists, and leading Republican figures such as Karl Rove and the chair of the Republican National Committee, Reince Priebus.

Trump also appears in the files, making a donation of $15,000 following a personal visit from Walker to the Republican nominee’s Fifth Avenue headquarters.

In addition to Trump, many of the most powerful and wealthy rightwing figures in the nation crop up in the files: from Home Depot co-founder Ken Langone, hedge-fund manager Paul Singer and Las Vegas casino giant Sheldon Adelson, to magnate Carl Icahn. “I got $1m from John Menard today,” Walker says in one email, referring to the billionaire owner of the home improvement chain Menards.

Among the new material contained in the documents are donations amounting to $750,000 to a third-party group closely aligned to Walker from the owner of NL Industries, a company that historically produced lead paint. Within the same timeframe as the donations, the Republican-controlled legislature passed new laws making it much more difficult for victims of lead paint poisoning to sue NL Industries and other former lead paint manufacturers (the laws were later overturned in the federal courts).

The John Doe files also provide new insight into the extensive efforts made by allies of Scott Walker to help a conservative member of the Wisconsin supreme court, David Prosser, hang onto his seat in a 2011 re-election. A network of like-minded groups and campaigners channeled $3.5m in undisclosed corporate funds to pay for TV and radio ads backing the judge.

The push was seen as vital, the documents disclose, as a means of retaining the rightwing majority of the court and thereby preserving the anti-union measures introduced by Walker. “If we lose [Justice Prosser], the Walker agenda is toast,” one ally writes in an email sent around to the governor’s chief of staff and several conservative lobbyists.

In 2015, Justice Prosser refused to recuse himself from a case in which the state supreme court sat in judgment over the John Doe investigation, despite the fact that the investigation focused on precisely the same network of lobbying groups and donors that had helped him hang onto his seat. The judge joined a majority of four conservative justices who voted to terminate the investigation and destroy all the documents now leaked to the Guardian.

Prosser told the Guardian that four years had passed since his re-election before he joined the decision to close the John Doe investigation, over which time any potential conflict of interest had faded.

The John Doe investigation was launched in 2012 after a set of recall elections that were forced on Walker and six Republican state senators in the wake of their hyper-partisan anti-union measure, Act 10. The prosecutors alleged that the governor’s campaign committee had operated a coordinated network involving outside lobby groups through which unlimited amounts of corporate money could be channeled without public disclosure.

Walker and the other parties who were the subjects of the John Doe investigation have all protested that they were unfairly accused of legal violations. They point out that no charges have been brought in the case, and that a succession of Wisconsin courts, including the state’s highest, have cleared them of wrongdoing.

Walker’s campaign told the Guardian that the John Doe investigation was “baseless” and had been shut down multiple times by the state courts. “There is absolutely no evidence of any wrongdoing,” a spokesman said.

The third-party lobbying groups that were the subject of the investigation said the prosecutors had accused wholly innocent individuals of crimes that did not exist under state law. They insisted they had a right to comment about public officials and policy and to protect the confidentiality of their donors.


Ed Pilkington in Madison, Wisconsin

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Scott Walker responds to John Doe files leak: nothing to see here
Wisconsin governor says investigation was ‘baseless’ after leaked files showing influence of corporate cash in politics were published by Guardian US

Ryan Felton in Detroit

15, Sep, 2016 @7:10 PM

Article image
Scott Walker, the John Doe files and how corporate cash influences American politics
Leaked court documents from ‘John Doe investigation’ in Wisconsin lay bare pervasive influence of corporate cash on modern US elections

Ed Pilkington and Aliza Aufrichtig, Kenan Davis, Jan Diehm, Rich Harris , Nadja Popovich on the Guardian US interactive team

14, Sep, 2016 @11:21 AM

Article image
Revealed: how corporate cash influences politics | The daily briefing
Extent of influence peddling in democratic process revealed in leaked documents; Obama calls for US to reject Trump’s ‘dark, pessimistic vision’; Chelsea Manning wins her gender surgery battle with army

Edward Helmore in New York

14, Sep, 2016 @12:53 PM

Article image
Scott Walker's withdrawal from White House race shows money isn't everything
Despite the backing of rich, high-profile donors, the Wisconsin governor’s new brand of Republicanism failed to appeal to the ordinary voters whose donations must fund the campaign machine

Dan Roberts and Ben Jacobs in Washington, and Zoe Sullivan in Madison

22, Sep, 2015 @9:02 AM

Article image
Wisconsin lawmakers urge investigation of Scott Walker after 'John Doe' papers
Legislators, who represent more than half of state assembly Democrats, call for district attorney to initiate investigation into alleged criminal misconduct

Ed Pilkington

29, Sep, 2016 @7:37 PM

Article image
How corporate dark money is taking power on both sides of the Atlantic | George Monbiot
A secretive network of business lobbyists has long held sway in US politics. Now their allies in the UK government are planning a Brexit that plays into their hands

George Monbiot

02, Feb, 2017 @6:29 PM

Article image
Obama turns 'austerity inauguration' into a dash for corporate cash

President made a point of transparency and capped donations in 2009 but critics say 2013 is dominated by the dollar

Ed Pilkington in New York

20, Jan, 2013 @7:29 PM

Article image
Lies, fearmongering and fables: that’s our democracy | George Monbiot
People power can challenge the status quo, but only if we understand our political system has inherent flaws

George Monbiot

04, Oct, 2016 @6:44 PM

Article image
Republican hopefuls reap $62m in support from donors with fossil fuel ties
Ted Cruz, Jeb Bush and Rick Perry among candidates poised to see biggest benefits from handful of wealthy individuals and corporations

Ed Pilkington in New York

12, Aug, 2015 @11:30 AM

Article image
Sheldon Adelson's billions shape US politics as many question his influence

Casino mogul is sparing no expense to get Romney elected, a win that would benefit his businesses and his bank account

Rory Carroll in Las Vegas, Tania Branigan in Beijing and Harriet Sherwood in Jerusalem

01, Nov, 2012 @6:07 PM