Tory rural raid will ruin countryside, says Andrew Motion

President of CPRE and ex-poet laureate describes Nick Boles's plans to build on greenfield sites as 'incredibly irresponsible'

Andrew Motion, the president of the Campaign to Protect Rural England, has launched a scathing attack on the "incredibly irresponsible" planning minister leading the charge to build on England's green fields.

The former poet laureate describes feeling emotions "somewhere between horror and enormous anger" as Tory minister Nick Boles set out his plans to build on 2m acres of unspoiled land.

In an unusually personal attack on the credibility of a new minister, Motion further castigates Boles for bringing an inappropriately "abrasive and irksome" attitude to the job on being promoted in the prime minister's last reshuffle.

The outspoken intervention comes in response to the minister's claims that land under development in the UK may have to increase by a third to tackle the housing shortage.

Boles, a former head of the rightwing thinktank Policy Exchange, warned on BBC2's Newsnight programme that, while he would seek to protect the green belt, large areas of "open land" may have to be given over for housing.

The minister told the programme: "In the UK and England at the moment we've got about 9% of land developed. All we need to do is build on another 2-3% of land and we'll have solved a housing problem." He added: "The built environment can be more beautiful than nature, and we shouldn't obsess about the fact that the only landscapes that are beautiful are open – sometimes buildings are better."

But , in an interview with the Observer, Motion condemns the minister's comments, describing him as wrong "on just about every level".

Motion, who succeeded writer Bill Bryson as head of the CPRE this year, says the minister's short-term fix will condemn greenfield sites to being lost for ever, degrading the "national masterpiece" that is this country's countryside. He further claims that the minister is simply mistaken in his figures.

Speaking days before the chancellor's autumn statement, in which further tinkering to planning laws and possible funding for house building could be announced, Motion said: "Nick Boles has clearly spent a lot of his life in thinktanks. And he has the kind of attitude you imagine went down quite well in a thinktank. Slightly abrasive, irksome, ruffling feathers.

"But to talk so blithely about these issues where so many people's lives and so much of our land is at stake is just incredibly irresponsible.

"On just about every level what he said was wrong. Start at the level of fact: he said 9% of our countryside is bricked over; by CPRE reckoning it is actually already more like 12%. And that doesn't take into account the collateral effects of development. About 50% of our land is already compromised in some way or other."

Boles claimed last week that building on open land was unavoidable as people had a moral "right to a home with a little bit of ground around it to bring your family up in".

The government concedes that the UK is in the grip of a housing crisis with the number of households expected to expand at the rate of 230,000 a year, creating a demand for housing that the current stock cannot fulfil.

But Motion publicly lambasts the minister, whose father was once head of the National Trust, for being out of touch and failing to understand what may be lost by bringing in the bulldozers.

He instead suggests that more could be done to develop brownfield sites.

Motion says: "The underlying problem is this idea that in a difficult economic time you can just lighten the burden of planning regulation as a kind of short-term fix.

"That is not how it works. Once you develop a piece of land it is gone for ever as countryside. Clearly there are issues around housing, but clearly also not nearly enough is being done to develop brownfield sites.

"And we know what will happen if this goes through: builders will slap up new estates in the most desirable places; they will snap up prime land in addition to the vast tracts of undeveloped land they own already."

A spokesman for the Department for Communities and Local Government said: "The government has repeatedly made clear that our reforms safeguard the countryside and the new framework maintains previous protections for green belt and countryside, including areas of outstanding natural beauty. It also puts power back into the hands of local people, ensuring they are in charge of deciding the areas they wish to see developed and those to be protected. The green belt provides the vital green lung against urban sprawl and local plans must have clear regard to this policy in the national framework."


Tim Adams and Daniel Boffey

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
'The problem is that once you develop land, it is gone forever as countryside' | Andrew Motion

As president of the Campaign to Protect Rural England, Sir Andrew Motion was looking forward to tackling important public issues. But, he tells Tim Adams, he was taken unawares by a new minister with some issues of his own

Tim Adams

01, Dec, 2012 @9:00 PM

Article image
Activists prepare for battle to save countryside from the developers

The fight over Lydd airport's proposed expansion in Kent highlights the conflict awaiting the government's new planning policy framework

Jamie Doward

20, Aug, 2011 @11:06 PM

Article image
Bitter battle to save King Lear’s green valley from the developers
A court ruling has backed Dover council’s decision to allow builders into an area of outstanding natural beauty

Robin Stummer

07, Feb, 2016 @12:04 AM

Get tough on second home owners, rural adviser tells Brown
The government is being urged to put controls on incomers so the Cornish can escape from 'squalor' into affordable housing, reports Jasper Gerard

18, Nov, 2007 @10:46 AM

Article image
Bill Bryson joins fight in countryside planning row

American writer and countryside campaigner concerned that shakeup may weaken planning laws to allow for development

John Vidal, environment editor

03, Sep, 2011 @6:02 PM

Article image
National Trust warns planning changes could tear up countryside
Builders and developers back simplified planning process to boost jobs and growth but conservationists predict mass revolt

Robert Booth and John Vidal

26, Jul, 2011 @4:50 PM

Article image
Councils 'to have final say' on greenfield sites under planning proposals

Planning minister Greg Clark says local communities are the best judges of what is important in their area

Jamie Doward

27, Aug, 2011 @9:16 PM

Article image
Laurie Lee's 'tangled woods and sprawling fields' at risk from Cotswold homes plan
Dan Glaister, who lives in the Slad Valley, finds surrealism and scepticism at the inquiry that could seal the Cider with Rosie land's fate

Dan Glaister

24, May, 2014 @11:05 PM

Article image
Apathy over planning law changes could put countryside in danger
Fresh fears over threat of urban sprawl as National Trust survey finds majority of people are unlikely to get involved

Jamie Doward

10, Sep, 2011 @6:31 PM

Article image
This localism bill will sacrifice our countryside to market forces | Simon Jenkins
Simon Jenkins: The government's 'sustainable' new planning policy invites corruption and will sink us in urban sprawl

Simon Jenkins

28, Jul, 2011 @8:00 PM