In times of uncertainty, we seek a sense of belonging | Letters

Readers on the monarchy and its place in Britain after the Queen’s death

It was heartening to read the words of the Labour MP Clive Lewis – they felt like a cool and level-headed salve amid the heat and fervour of public mourning (“Amid the mourning, we republicans should look back and learn – but we must not be silenced”, 16 September). It feels as if in moments of uncertainty our communities reach for the familiar, for a sense of belonging. Perhaps this sense of unity may be found by shifting our taxes and our time towards building a nation of equals, a reinvigorated democracy and an empowered citizenry. In essence, what we need now is a new social contract, where the same sense of respect and, dare I say it, love is afforded to struggling workers, isolated older people and children who rely on food banks to eat. Across the Commonwealth, people are struggling terribly. All the pageantry in the world cannot deflect from the need to incisively question the old ways of thinking.
April Cumming
Melbourne, Australia

• Clive Lewis misses the point about the monarchy. It is popular because it speaks to the irrational in us. That irrationality is all around us, and is probably a significant way of coping with the world. We all get a kick out of the spectacle, the silliness and the sheer stupidity of it.
Ian d’Alton
Naas, County Kildare, Ireland

• Despite much of what Clive Lewis said being true, people in the UK enjoy the monarchy. I do myself, recognising it as an institution that has endured for about 1,500 years. It defines who we are as a nation, and for that reason it should remain. For those who don’t support it, don’t impose your ideals on the majority who want to retain it.
Colin Henshaw
Bowdon, Greater Manchester

• The suffocation of any public expression of dissent (or simply a different opinion), generally unchallenged by most of the mainstream media, has been deeply disturbing. I can recall being at school in the 1960s, a staid and conventional girls’ grammar school, where there was a debating society. The topic of the abolition of the monarchy often featured and triggered a lively exchange, followed by voting on the motion. I wonder if young people at school would be permitted to have that debate now.
Mavis Zutshi
Stroud, Gloucestershire

• Clive Lewis is right to speak out, but his article left me also with “bemusement followed by (more than) a touch of despair”. I suspect that Lewis, like most MPs, views everything through a political lens and, as such, rails against key events of the last 70 years, such as privatisation of industries, including energy. He states how things should be run. Normal people, for whom politics comes around only every five years (or more often, if we were able to choose a prime minister) ask a different question: does it work?

As a general free-marketeer, I would still prefer a well-run nationalised industry to a badly run private one, but, as a child of the 1960s and 70s, my recollection is of strikes in such industries, with huge proportions of pay going towards bills, and bailiffs a silent threat.

If Brexit taught us anything, it was to beware those offering simple solutions for complex problems. The outpouring of feeling – and I do not disagree with Lewis on it – is surely evidence of something apolitical, which is perhaps why he struggles with it.
Dr Chris Howick

Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication.


The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Republicanism and the royal family | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to Larry Elliott’s stance on the republican cause in Britain and debate the possibility of radical change


16, Jun, 2019 @4:45 PM

Article image
This queue is surely a UK record breaker | Brief letters
Brief letters: Waiting in line | Inactive government | Liz Truss undercover | Thérèse Coffey’s Oxford full stop | Republican anonymity

16, Sep, 2022 @4:16 PM

Article image
Is it time for Britain to have an elected head of state? | Letters
Letters: Readers on the role of the monarchy in modern politics and whether it should be abolished


16, Mar, 2021 @5:10 PM

Article image
Republicans face a grim reality in modern Britain | Letters
Letters: Readers express concern about the silencing of people expressing republican views


14, Sep, 2022 @4:52 PM

Article image
Why becoming a republic may be risky for Britain | Letters
Letters: There are far more potent threats to democracy than having a non-elected head of state, writes Duncan Wilson in response to Polly Toynbee’s article on the monarchy. Plus letters from Roger Smith, Lyn A Dade and Michael Peel


08, Jun, 2022 @4:24 PM

Article image
In this jubilee year, the appeal of the monarchy is still strong | Letters
Letters: War, slavery and lack of social mobility are not limited to monarchical nations, writes Ian Roberts; plus letters from Harry Dickinson and Jenny Bushell


20, May, 2022 @5:08 PM

Article image
Queen’s funeral spells bad news for guinea pigs | Brief letters
Brief letters: Guinea Pig Awareness Week | NHS procedures postponed | Mourning Charles de Gaulle | The making of a republican


14, Sep, 2022 @4:50 PM

Article image
Labour’s remain struggle and Boris Johnson’s PM strategy | Letters
Letters: Paul Atkin, Bryn Jones and Marie Catterson respond to an article by Owen Jones, while Janet Jones hopes the Queen will step in to defend the rights of her subjects


30, Jun, 2019 @5:07 PM

Article image
Labour, Corbyn and national unity | Letters
Letters: Gerald Dunning says Labour’s overriding aim should be to ensure there will never be another Tory government, David Thacker thinks John McDonnell is right to reject a government of national unity, while Roy Boffy criticises Corbyn. Plus letters from Virginia Yates and Ruth Knox


09, Aug, 2019 @4:41 PM

Article image
What to expect of a modern monarchy | Letters
Letters: Robert Hazell and Bob Morris think the statutory oaths that the new sovereign will have to make need to be revised and updated. Plus letters from Mark Flinn and Peggy Thomas


31, Dec, 2021 @4:57 PM