Ministers may face legal action over documents on Queen’s hidden wealth

BEIS has until end of October to respond to request from information commissioner or risk being taken to court

Ministers could face contempt of court proceedings unless they respond to a request for documents that could reveal how the late Queen concealed part of her private wealth from the public.

Britain’s transparency watchdog, the information commissioner, has threatened legal action against the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS), which has stonewalled the request for two years.

It now has until the end of October to respond to the freedom of information request or it could face court action.

The documents may detail how the late monarch used a secretive financial facility to hide from the public the shares in commercial companies that she owned, along with the value of those shares.

The size of her personal fortune, including her investments, has never been disclosed to the public. Estimates regularly speculated that it could amount to hundreds of millions of pounds.

Last year the Guardian revealed how the Queen successfully lobbied the government to alter proposed legislation to prevent her shareholdings from being disclosed to the public.

As a result of her lobbying in the 1970s, the government created a state-backed shell company, Bank of England Nominees, which appears to have kept secret the Queen’s private shareholdings and investments for more than three decades.

Documents obtained by the Guardian show that other members of the royal family were able to use the same company to conceal their investments in companies. The identities of the other Windsors, along with the scale of their shareholdings, are also unknown.

In 1973 the Queen dispatched her private lawyer to lobby the government to change a proposed law that would allow the public to establish who owned shares in specific companies. Her lawyer argued that disclosure of her shareholdings would be “embarrassing”.

A special exemption was inserted into the proposed law, according to an internal Whitehall document written in 2011, “to avoid a situation where for example ownership of specific shares by members of the royal family could become widely known”.

The shell company, operated by senior individuals at the Bank of England, was set up in 1977 “to hold royal investments”, according to the document.

“This vehicle, relevant trustees and investment managers and certain members of the royal family were granted an exemption from the requirement to disclose an interest in a company’s shares,” the document added.

The shell company’s directors were required to send annual reports to the government listing “the identity of those for whom it holds securities, and, provided that it holds securities for two or more people, the total value of the securities”.

In 2020 the Guardian submitted a freedom of information request to BEIS for copies of these annual reports.

Interactive

The department has failed to respond, even though public bodies are required to process requests under the Freedom of Information Act within 20 working days.

Now the information commissioner has ruled that the department has broken the rules of the Freedom of Information Act. The watchdog ordered the department to deal with the request, warning that it could be taken to court if it failed to act before 31 October. The court has the power to rule that the department had committed a contempt of court. BEIS said it would “be responding in compliance” with the deadline.

Bank of England Nominees appears to have kept secret the investments of the royal family until at latest 2011. The Whitehall document from that year stated: “These arrangements have now lapsed and the Palace is clear that there is no wish for them to be reinstated”. The company was wound up five years ago.

It is unclear why the exemption was ended, or what arrangements to keep secret royal investments replaced it.

The Queen appears to have used a secretive mechanism, known as Queen’s consent, to secure changes to the 1973 draft law. Under this mechanism, the government must obtain the monarch’s approval for laws that affect the Windsors’ private wealth or royal powers.

Contributors

David Pegg and Rob Evans

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Chinese delegation banned from Queen’s lying-in-state
Commons Speaker moves after sanctions imposed on British MPs, but Chinese vice-president may be allowed

Patrick Wintour Diplomatic editor

16, Sep, 2022 @8:44 AM

Article image
More than 29m people in UK watched Queen’s funeral, TV data shows
Figure is fewer than 31m who watched Euro 2020 final, and peaked at 19.5m viewers on BBC One

Jim Waterson and Tobi Thomas

20, Sep, 2022 @6:26 PM

Article image
Queen’s children hold vigil over coffin in Westminster Hall
King Charles led second vigil with siblings as the public filed past

Caroline Davies

16, Sep, 2022 @8:04 PM

Article image
Queen’s funeral poses biggest security test, says Olympics police chief
Bob Broadhurst says royal family’s desire to be close to public is an ‘absolutely frightening’ prospect

Jamie Grierson

12, Sep, 2022 @5:28 PM

Article image
‘It’s a huge honour’: military rehearses for Queen’s funeral procession
Troops and military horses have been rehearsing almost non-stop for four days to ensure nothing goes wrong

Rachel Hall

13, Sep, 2022 @10:54 AM

Article image
Queen’s approval of laws must be more transparent, Scottish ministers told
Holyrood aims to open up opaque mechanism after Guardian revealed secret influence on draft legislation

Severin Carrell, Rob Evans and David Pegg

28, Jun, 2022 @5:30 PM

Article image
‘Undemocratic facade’: four people on why they avoided the Queen’s funeral
As millions watched live or on TV, many could not, or chose not to, take part in Monday’s national mourning

Clea Skopeliti and Jedidajah Otte

19, Sep, 2022 @3:26 PM

Article image
British republicans hold back for Queen’s funeral but plan future protests
Campaign group says Monday events would not have been ‘appropriate’ but points to falling support for monarchy

Alexandra Topping

19, Sep, 2022 @3:39 PM

Article image
‘It’s really helped me’: Midlands centre screens Queen’s funeral for locals
As most community hubs closed for bank holiday, Dorothy Parkes centre says staying open was a ‘no brainer’

Jessica Murray

19, Sep, 2022 @1:48 PM

Article image
Foreign dignitaries must share buses to travel to the Queen’s funeral
Government guidance sets out strict rules urging international royalty and presidents to travel by commercial flights

Jessica Elgot and Pippa Crerar

11, Sep, 2022 @8:13 PM