Arron Banks allowed to appeal over lost libel action against Carole Cadwalladr

High court judge grants permission on one ground after ruling last week in Observer and Guardian journalist’s favour

The multimillionaire Brexit backer Arron Banks has been granted permission to appeal against the judge’s decision in his unsuccessful libel action against the Observer and Guardian journalist Carole Cadwalladr.

Banks, who funded the pro-Brexit Leave.EU campaign group, raised five grounds on which he said Mrs Justice Steyn had made a wrong decision in her judgment relating to comments Cadwalladr made about him in a Ted talk and a tweet, both in 2019.

At a hearing at the high court on Friday, Steyn rejected four of the grounds but granted permission to appeal on one, which she said had a “real prospect of success”.

In her judgment handed down last week, Steyn ruled that the threshold for serious harm had only been met in the Ted talk, but that Cadwalladr initially had successfully established a public interest defence under section 4 of the Defamation Act.

Steyn said the defence fell away when the Electoral Commission found no evidence of law-breaking by Banks with respect to donations, but by that time – 29 April 2020 – the court was not satisfied that the continuing publication of the Ted talk caused or was likely to cause serious harm to his reputation.

The successful ground for permission to appeal related to whether in law the court was correct to say the serious harm test needed to be determined again from the time of the commission’s statement.

In written submissions, Banks’s barrister Sara Mansoori QC said the test of serious harm in the Defamation Act “only falls for determination once, from the date of the original publication. The claimant succeeded in discharging the burden of establishing that the publication complained of had caused and was likely to cause serious harm to his reputation. At that point it was for the defendant to demonstrate that she had a defence to the original publication and/or its continuing publication.”

Allowing permission to appeal, Steyn said it was an “issue of law that hasn’t been determined previously”. She rejected the other four grounds on the basis that they related to findings of fact, which very rarely result in the green light being given for an appeal.

For Cadwalladr, Gavin Millar QC argued that the judge was right to apply the serious harm test afresh from April 2020, but accepted that it was an issue of law.

Mansoori said Banks would consider whether to apply directly to the court of appeal with respect to the grounds that were rejected by Steyn.


Haroon Siddique Legal affairs correspondent

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Arron Banks loses libel action against reporter Carole Cadwalladr
Judge rules Guardian journalist successfully established public interest defence under Defamation Act

Haroon Siddique Legal affairs correspondent

13, Jun, 2022 @11:49 AM

Article image
Arron Banks loses two of three challenges to failed libel action against Carole Cadwalladr
Court of appeal upholds one claim Brexit backer suffered serious harm by continuing publication of inaccurate Ted Talk criticisms

Haroon Siddique Legal affairs correspondent

28, Feb, 2023 @7:04 PM

Article image
Libel loss for Arron Banks gives welcome fillip to journalists
Analysis: Win for multimillionaire would have been another blow to news organisations concerned by curbs on reporting

Haroon Siddique Legal affairs correspondent

13, Jun, 2022 @4:13 PM

Article image
Judge makes preliminary ruling in Carole Cadwalladr libel case
Arron Banks, who funded Leave.EU campaign, has brought defamation action against journalist

David Pegg

12, Dec, 2019 @6:47 PM

Article image
Arron Banks drops two parts of libel claim against Carole Cadwalladr
Action will proceed but only over statements made in Ted Talk last year and one tweet

Owen Bowcott legal affairs correspondent

23, Jan, 2020 @7:09 PM

Article image
Supreme court orders libel case retrial over judge's 'barrage of hostility'
Judge’s use of ‘immoderate, ill-tempered and at times offensive language’ meant trial was unfair, court rules

Owen Bowcott Legal affairs correspondent

03, Jun, 2020 @12:30 PM

Article image
Cadwalladr reports on Arron Banks’ Russia links of huge public interest, court hears
Banks is suing Guardian journalist for defamation over Brexit backer’s ‘covert relationship’ with Russia

Haroon Siddique Legal affairs correspondent

21, Jan, 2022 @4:57 PM

Article image
Saudi prince launches libel action against Forbes magazine over Rich List

Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, who owns London's Savoy hotel, claims US publication undervalued his wealth by $9.6bn. By Josh Halliday

Josh Halliday

06, Jun, 2013 @3:21 PM

Article image
Carole Cadwalladr’s victory over Arron Banks is great news, but our libel laws need reform | Duncan Campbell
There must be more protection for people who keep us informed, says former Guardian crime correspondent Duncan Campbell

Duncan Campbell

13, Jun, 2022 @4:02 PM

Article image
Sunday Telegraph pays damages to mosque chief over Corbyn article
Story falsely portrayed Mohammed Kozbar as supporter of violent extremism in attempt to criticise Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn

Jim Waterson Media editor

09, May, 2018 @5:51 PM