Why becoming a republic may be risky for Britain | Letters

There are far more potent threats to democracy than having a non-elected head of state, writes Duncan Wilson in response to Polly Toynbee’s article on the monarchy. Plus letters from Roger Smith, Lyn A Dade and Michael Peel

I read with interest Polly Toynbee’s column suggesting abolition of the monarchy (For today, even republicans like me can put up with the pomp with a drink in hand, 2 June) and it led me to peruse Republic’s website. What struck me is that Republic essentially wants what we already have – a head of state who is non-political, advisory, represents the nation and offers a “non-political voice at times of crisis and celebration”. Isn’t that really a description of the monarch? The only difference is an elected v non-elected figurehead. Its assumption is that a non-elected head of state operating outside the political system would, by nature, be corrupt – but aren’t elections a democratic process of expressing political opinion and bias? So an elected head would necessarily be politically biased, the very antithesis of Republic’s holy grail.

The monarchy, certainly during the present Queen’s reign, has had undoubted soft-power benefits for the UK and has influenced the spread of democracy across the globe through the Commonwealth. May I respectfully suggest that Republic gives some consideration to the abuse of legislative power by the increasing use of a non-elected judiciary and court system to challenge the democratic processes of an elected government? I would suggest that that is a far more insidious threat to democracy than a monarch.
Duncan Wilson
Hotham, East Riding of Yorkshire

• Polly Toynbee, in her typically cogent analysis, encourages us to think deeply about the need for a republic at the end of this present reign. However, I can clearly remember around 40 years ago that one could put the fear of God into all but the most fervent republican with just two words: “President Thatcher”? How much more repugnant would today’s equivalent be: President Johnson? If Britain is ever to become a republic, and I agree that it should, I therefore propose that a necessary prerequisite would be an absolute bar on anybody who has ever served as a member of either chamber of parliament from standing for election as president.
Roger Smith
Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire

• The future of the monarchy is inextricably linked with our constitutional arrangements. Our “elective dictatorship”, a term coined by the former Conservative lord chancellor Lord Hailsham in the 1970s, rests on the concept of “the crown in parliament” – the Commons and Lords acting in concert to exercise the powers of the crown. It may have been a good idea in 1689 when William and Mary were invited to take the throne, but time and incremental change have taken powers from Lords and Commons and vested them first in the executive and now in the prime minister. Hailsham outlined the dangers of government by gentleman’s agreement. And Boris Johnson is no gentleman.
Lyn A Dade
Co-founder, RebootGB.today

• I don’t think we know the future of the monarchy (This jubilee is not like any other: we look back but can also see the future, 4 June). Only 15% of the British population were born before Elizabeth Windsor became Queen. For most people, her presence is the norm. Whenever she dies there will be an unprecedented constitutional crisis, at which point we will all need to face an issue that has been kicked down the road for decades, and for which there are no easy answers.
Michael Peel
London

Letters

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
In this jubilee year, the appeal of the monarchy is still strong | Letters
Letters: War, slavery and lack of social mobility are not limited to monarchical nations, writes Ian Roberts; plus letters from Harry Dickinson and Jenny Bushell

Letters

20, May, 2022 @5:08 PM

Article image
Is it time for Britain to have an elected head of state? | Letters
Letters: Readers on the role of the monarchy in modern politics and whether it should be abolished

Letters

16, Mar, 2021 @5:10 PM

Article image
Republicans face a grim reality in modern Britain | Letters
Letters: Readers express concern about the silencing of people expressing republican views

Letters

14, Sep, 2022 @4:52 PM

Article image
Give us an autumn bank holiday instead | Letter
Letter: While an extra day off as a legacy of the platinum jubilee is welcome, it should be in the dreary months from August to Christmas rather than June, writes Vanessa Steele

Letters

27, Apr, 2022 @4:50 PM

Article image
Republicanism and the royal family | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to Larry Elliott’s stance on the republican cause in Britain and debate the possibility of radical change

Letters

16, Jun, 2019 @4:45 PM

Article image
This queue is surely a UK record breaker | Brief letters
Brief letters: Waiting in line | Inactive government | Liz Truss undercover | Thérèse Coffey’s Oxford full stop | Republican anonymity

16, Sep, 2022 @4:16 PM

Article image
Queen’s funeral spells bad news for guinea pigs | Brief letters
Brief letters: Guinea Pig Awareness Week | NHS procedures postponed | Mourning Charles de Gaulle | The making of a republican

Letters

14, Sep, 2022 @4:50 PM

Article image
Platinum anniversary for a devoted reader | Brief letters
Letters: Reading the Guardian for 70 years | Queen Elizabeth II avatar | Dressing your age | Ageism

Letters

03, Jun, 2022 @4:38 PM

Article image
It’s no Mona Lisa, but this portrait of the Queen by a robot may well be art | Letter
Letter: With humans involved in supporting Ai-Da, it may be the 21st century’s iteration of the great masters’ Renaissance studios, says Rebecca Keating

Letters

31, May, 2022 @5:02 PM

Article image
In times of uncertainty, we seek a sense of belonging | Letters
Letters: Readers on the monarchy and its place in Britain after the Queen’s death

Letters

19, Sep, 2022 @4:14 PM