Foreign Office official raised ‘stark’ criticisms of Rwanda plan, court hears

Guardian, BBC and Times seek release of documents about policy of sending asylum seekers abroad

A Foreign Office official raised concerns about plans to send asylum seekers to Rwanda, citing state surveillance, arbitrary detention, torture and killings by the country’s government, the high court has heard.

The court has been asked to consider an application by the foreign secretary to keep parts of certain government documents secret for fear the contents could damage international relations and threaten national security.

The government’s application for a public interest immunity (PII) certificate asks to keep 10 short passages confidential.

The Guardian, the BBC and the Times made submissions to the court urging disclosure of these 10 passages, arguing that this was in the public interest. A draft ruling from Lord Justice Lewis into the PII application is expected tomorrow.

Neil Sheldon QC, acting for the foreign secretary, told the court that the application was only to keep short passages out of the public domain and that most of the documents about the Rwanda plans have been disclosed.

Parties challenging the lawfulness of the Rwanda policy – the PCS union, Care4Calais, Detention Action and some asylum seekers – say the passages should be made public.

Jude Bunting QC, acting for the three media organisations, said: “What we seek to stand up for is the interest of the public in the administration of justice.”

Christopher Knight, representing some of the claimants, said of the documents already published: “A number of the criticisms are quite stark”

He cited one document from a Foreign Office official which states: “There are state control, security, surveillance structures from the national level down to [households]. Political opposition is not tolerated and arbitrary detention, torture and even killings are accepted methods of enforcing control too.”

Similar concerns were raised at an earlier high court hearing last month.

At that hearing it emerged in court documents that on 10 February 2021, the UK high commissioner to Rwanda said the UK should not do a deal with Rwanda because the country had been accused of recruiting refugees to conduct armed operations in neighbouring nations.

A Foreign Office memo dated 20 May 2021 urged No 10 not to get involved with the Rwanda deal owing to significant human rights concerns.

When the UK government conducted an independent assessment of Rwanda’s human rights record, the Home Office showed it to Rwanda to comment on the final draft and allowed officials to suggest amendments.

The full high court hearing into the lawfulness of the plans to forcibly send some asylum seekers who arrive in the UK on small boats or lorries to Rwanda is due to take place on 5 September.

A government spokesperson said: “Rwanda is a safe and secure country with a track record of supporting asylum seekers.

“We remain committed to delivering this policy to break the business model of criminal gangs and save lives.”


Diane Taylor

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
UK Home Office plans second flight to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda
Flight could take off within weeks and before court has ruled on whether scheme is lawful

Diane Taylor

03, Jul, 2022 @3:00 PM

Article image
Rwanda scheme would ‘completely erode’ UK’s standing on world stage
New Human Rights Watch head Tirana Hassan says UK’s plan to deport asylum seekers is ‘cheap politics’

Julian Borger in New York

26, Mar, 2023 @3:07 PM

Article image
Supreme court to rule on publishing Prince Charles' 'black spider memos'
Ruling by UK’s most senior judges will be the climax of decade-long legal battle between the Guardian and Whitehall over prince’s letters to ministers

Robert Booth and Rob Evans

25, Mar, 2015 @6:39 PM

Article image
UK ministers ignored evidence Rwanda violated human rights, court told
African country went back on list of destinations for ‘migration partnership’ after civil servants had ruled it out, judges hear

Rajeev Syal and Diane Taylor

05, Sep, 2022 @6:57 PM

Article image
Raab says court was wrong to block Rwanda deportation flight
Decision by European court of human rights strengthens case for overhaul of UK laws, says deputy PM

Aubrey Allegretti Political correspondent

16, Jun, 2022 @10:09 AM

Article image
Guardian challenges ban on publication of Prince Charles's letters to ministers

Two-day appeal follows ruling in favour of attorney general, who said letters could harm future king's position of political neutrality

Rob Evans

24, Feb, 2014 @11:20 AM

Article image
Minister accused of wrongly blocking publication of Prince Charles letters

Decision by attorney general to veto disclosure of prince's letters to ministers was fundamentally flawed, high court told

Rob Evans

08, May, 2013 @11:41 PM

Article image
Rwanda asylum flight cancelled after 11th-hour ECHR intervention
First flight to Rwanda grounded after lawyers make successful emergency application

Diane Taylor, Rajeev Syal and Emine Sinmaz in Kigali

14, Jun, 2022 @10:36 PM

Article image
Airline hired for UK’s Rwanda deportations pulls out of scheme
Exclusive: Privilege Style causes problem for Home Office as it bows to pressure from campaigners

Rajeev Syal Home affairs editor

21, Oct, 2022 @10:37 AM

The readers' editor on… an unhappy clash of editorial and commercial content
Chris Elliott: Open door: The appearance of a promotional supplement paid for by Sri Lanka in the same edition as a story detailing claims of torture by the country's security personnel was far from serendipitous

Chris Elliott

10, Jun, 2012 @6:00 PM