Why the Queen’s money never goes down | Letter

Former Liberal Democrat MP Norman Baker on public ownership of the crown estate and the result of a ‘stupid’ change to the royal finance arrangements by former chancellor George Osborne

It is misleading to suggest that “the Queen’s land and property” has dropped in value by £500m (Queen’s property drops in value by £500m after rental receipts decline, 18 September). The crown estate is public property, handed to the government in 1760 in a deal that in return absolved the monarch of the need to pay for the army, the civil service and so on.

In recent decades Buckingham Palace, and especially Prince Charles, has eyed the estate’s profits greedily and been keen to return it to royal hands – but not, of course, to start paying again for those costs removed from the monarch in 1760.

Until 2012, 100% of the profits went to the Treasury, as they should, but then George Osborne stupidly changed the royal finance arrangements to give the Queen a percentage of the crown estate’s profits, now up to 25%. This helps to explain why the annual civil list, which was £7.9m in 2010, has ballooned to well over £80m each year under the sovereign grant that replaced it.

But royal supporters worried by the drop in income for the crown estate in 2020/21 referred to in your report can breathe easy. Under Osborne’s generous deal, money for the Queen can only ever stay the same or go up, never down.
Norman Baker
Former Liberal Democrat MP; author of And What Do YOU Do? – What the Royal Family Don’t Want You to Know

• Join the conversation – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com

• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit theguardian.com/letters

Letters

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
A worthier cause for the Queen’s fortune | Brief letters
Brief letters: Tapestry restoration | Madonna’s Blond Ambition | Taxpayer bonuses | Boris Johnson | Rupert Murdoch

Letters

17, Feb, 2022 @6:13 PM

Article image
Queen’s stirring funeral shows the power of pageantry | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to the spectacle and splendour of Britain saying goodbye to its longest-reigning monarch

Letters

20, Sep, 2022 @5:02 PM

Article image
Queen’s funeral holiday piles more pressure on NHS | Letters
Letter: Dealing with the recently announced public holiday and rescheduling delayed treatments takes hours of planning, says a hospital consultant

Letters

16, Sep, 2022 @4:19 PM

Article image
Queen’s funeral spells bad news for guinea pigs | Brief letters
Brief letters: Guinea Pig Awareness Week | NHS procedures postponed | Mourning Charles de Gaulle | The making of a republican

Letters

14, Sep, 2022 @4:50 PM

Article image
A funeral that didn’t happen as smoothly as the Queen’s | Brief letters
Brief letters: Funeral planning | Dropping the ball | Guardian delivery | Hope for a republic | Peaceful cycling

19, Sep, 2022 @4:12 PM

Article image
With the Queen’s death, Britain’s grand delusions must give way to reality | Letters
Letters: Jean Hewitt, Natalie Maguire, David Learmount and Bruce Hugman respond to an article by Nesrine Malik on the country’s image of itself

Letters

13, Sep, 2022 @4:31 PM

Article image
This be the verse for the Queen’s jubilee: Philip Larkin, Ted Hughes and Elizabeth II | Letters
Letter: David Evans recalls Philip Larkin’s poem for the silver jubilee and his pastiche of what he imagined Ted Hughes might write

Letters

11, Feb, 2022 @6:02 PM

Article image
Real constitutional reform goes beyond abolishing the monarchy | Letters
Letters: To really empower ordinary people, we must overhaul a political system no longer fit for purpose, writes Hugh Legge. Plus letters from Nigel Florence, Christopher Tanner and Andrew Dean

Letters

20, Feb, 2022 @5:40 PM

Article image
UK boxes clever when it comes to recycling | Brief letters
Brief letters: Recycling | Judi Dench audiobooks | Glass less than half full | Prince Andrew | Jo Swinson | Boris Johnson

Letters

22, Nov, 2019 @5:07 PM

Article image
Republicanism and the royal family | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to Larry Elliott’s stance on the republican cause in Britain and debate the possibility of radical change

Letters

16, Jun, 2019 @4:45 PM