Priti Patel’s asylum tirade plumbs new depths | Letters

The home secretary incites further disregard for the legal entitlements of vulnerable people, to whom this country has clear international obligations, writes John Nicholson. Plus letters from Jackie Fearnley and SP Chakravarty

The home secretary, Priti Patel, says she “welcomes people through safe and legal routes” – but she will “stop [people] making endless legal claims to remain” (Priti Patel says Tories will bring in new laws for ‘broken’ UK asylum system, 4 October).

Needless to say, this is a government that picks and chooses which bits of international law to follow. But this latest tirade is simply irresponsible and incites further disregard for the legal entitlements of vulnerable people, to whom this country has clear international obligations of essential humanitarian protection.

Legal aid has been repeatedly cut – and the Legal Aid Agency is failing to fund legal aid lawyers’ work this year while many decisions remain in lengthy queues of unheard appeals. People claiming asylum often do not have access to free local legal advice in the first place.

The Home Office is so hostile that, when its decisions have been able to be challenged, even the tribunals this year have allowed 45% of the (lawfully entitled) appeals against them. Is Patel seriously saying that the latter – independent courts – are not “safe and legal”?

This underfunded system, beset with tabloid prejudice and inequalities of access, is indeed “broken” – but who does Patel think broke it?
John Nicholson

• Outsourcing asylum interviewing to unaccountable corporations and then cutting down on the appeal system is not the way to fix the broken asylum system. Enormous amounts of time and money could be saved by ensuring that most of the decisions are right the first time. They are matters of life and death, needing careful consideration. Resources need to be put into professional training for Home Office interviewers and decision-makers, who should not adopt a hostile stance but should pride themselves on getting to the truth of what has happened to the person in front of them. They should also have a grounding in the politics and human rights records of the countries that produce people needing to find sanctuary.

If further evidence is needed to assess an asylum seeker’s account, funding should be provided at an early stage for the sending of further evidence from the country of origin, and for any relevant reports needed – on, for example, torture wounds by a specialised doctor or an assessment of the authenticity of documents from a country expert.

If, after careful consideration of all relevant evidence, there is a refusal by the Home Office, an appeal hearing before an immigration judge could be applied for, and there should be room for a further appeal from either the Home Office or the asylum seeker on errors of law. I would imagine that very few claims would need to go to any higher courts, but those options should not be removed.
Jackie Fearnley
Goathland, North Yorkshire

• Priti Patel’s chilling attack on human rights lawyers for having the temerity to challenge her take on asylum reminds one of the attacks on defence lawyers by authoritarian regimes around the world. These threats eventually lead to a law-breaking regime, and not just in a “very specific and limited way”.

Coming up to the start of Stalin’s rule, defence lawyers were vilified as crooks and accused of insulting the Russian people. Then the persecution took more ominous forms. Jailing and intimidation followed. That was not enough. A law was passed barring the presence of lawyers in trials of those that the regime chose to call terrorists. Then Stalin’s henchman, Andrei Vyshinsky, promulgated a theory of the law justifying the use of the legal system to express the power of the regime.
SP Chakravarty
Bangor, Gwynedd


The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Priti Patel’s plan to ‘offshore’ asylum seekers is callous | Letter
Letter: We should be deeply pained by the way we are with the stranger who lives in our midst, writes Alexandra Wright, senior rabbi at the Liberal Jewish Synagogue


30, Jun, 2021 @5:29 PM

Article image
Rwanda refugee policy is like the rendition of slaves in the 1800s | Letters
Letters: Prof Julia O’Connell Davidson likens the government’s plans to deport asylum seekers to the forced returns facilitated by the Fugitive Slave Act in the US. Plus a letter from Mark Stephens


16, Jun, 2022 @4:44 PM

Article image
Asylum plans should fill Tories with deep shame | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to government’s proposals to process migrants seeking refuge in the UK in detention facilities overseas or on disused ferry boats


02, Oct, 2020 @2:58 PM

Article image
Those seeking asylum deserve so much better than this government | Letters
Letters: New immigration proposals betray the UK’s history of accepting refugees, write Dr Edie Friedman and Adam Rose from the Jewish Council for Racial Equality. Plus letters from Ruth Kitching and John Nicholson


28, Mar, 2021 @3:41 PM

Article image
Asylum seekers deserve far better | Letters
Letters: Thousands of refugees in the UK live in rundown conditions with the bare minimum of provisions, writes Enver Solomon of the Refugee Council


03, Feb, 2021 @6:02 PM

Article image
UK plans to send thousands of asylum seekers to Rwanda, says Boris Johnson – as it happened
Opposition parties denounce plan as ‘shameful’ and ‘evil’; home secretary Priti Patel in Kigali today to unveil more details

Andrew Sparrow

14, Apr, 2022 @4:45 PM

Article image
Tragic consequences of repatriating asylum seekers | Letter
Letter: Officials often underestimate the dangers faced by failed asylum seekers who are forcibly sent home, writes Jackie Fearnley


16, Feb, 2022 @5:07 PM

Article image
Cruel Tory migration bill will erode basic right to seek asylum | Letters
Letters: The impact the policy will have across the world can’t be ignored, says Oliver Lough. Plus letters from Derrick Joad, Nigel Griffin and David Duell

19, Mar, 2023 @4:31 PM

Article image
Priti Patel’s borders bill is designed to look tough, not solve any real problems | Daniel Trilling
Asylum claims in the UK are historically low. These punitive measures will only force more people into legal limbo, says author Daniel Trilling

Daniel Trilling

14, Jul, 2021 @11:28 AM

Article image
Patel’s asylum plans lack sense and compassion | Letters
Letters: Instead of pursuing cruel and unethical means of controlling immigration, the Home Office must focus on providing safe and legal routes to the UK, write Jewish campaigners for racial equality, while Richard Hargreaves describes Priti Patel’s proposals as indefensible


12, Oct, 2020 @4:26 PM