UK immigration officials accused of using coercive tactics to access homes

Officers allegedly bypassing need for search warrants by demanding entry to homes

Immigration officials have been accused of using coercive tactics to gain access to people’s homes and businesses without search warrants.

Campaigners claim that rather than convince a judge of the need to perform a search, uniformed immigration officers often simply demand to be let into the premises they are targeting.

While the law allows them to enter if the occupant gives “informed consent”, critics have said many of the people targeted are unlikely to know they have the right to refuse without risking getting into trouble.

“We have been extremely concerned with the number of cases in which immigration enforcement officers have failed to obtain fully informed consent,” the Migrants’ Rights Network (MRN) told the Guardian.

Mahlea Babjak, the group’s London project manager, said many people were “not being given information regarding all the risks and alternatives to being questioned during an immigration raid”, adding: “Every business owner and employee has the right to feel safe in their workplace.”

The practice was highlighted in evidence given in a case against two anti-raids activists accused of obstructing immigration officers. The district judge, Julia Newton, sitting at Highbury Corner magistrates court, dismissed the charges last Friday.

Raj Chada, of the law firm Hodge Jones and Allen, who represented the two activists, said many people visited by immigration officers were not in a position to give genuinely informed consent. “What the hell are they going to say? The occupier often does not know they can say no. They call it informed consent, I call it coercive consent.”

The MRN said people from black, Asian and minority ethnic backgrounds were among the principal targets of immigration raids against small businesses, which it said amounted to discrimination.

It said: “These operations are rarely focused on intelligence and are consistently beyond a warrant’s scope. We urge the Home Office to stop conducting immigration raids in the community, as they are extremely harmful to a business’s local reputation and financial earnings, and damaging to employees’ mental wellbeing.”

Activists from the Anti-Raids Network, which regularly documents enforcement activities, have also accused the authorities of pursuing them for political reasons after the case against two of their number was dismissed.

Babjak said: “We are extremely concerned with the Home Office’s recent targeting of activists, as we believe the Home Office must be held to account for its actions that undermine domestic and international law and the rights of all migrants.”

Holly Lynch, the shadow immigration minister, said: “This government repeatedly fails to respect the law and legal protections for people, while deliberately undermining the role of lawyers on immigration matters. These are serious issues and it’s vital that the law is adhered to at all times. Failure to do that puts at risk the possibility of sound and fair judgments being made.”

A Home Office spokeswoman said: “Immigration officers have a range of powers to tackle illegal working, which is a key driver of illegal migration and exploitative working conditions, including modern slavery.” She denied officers were “bypassing the need for a warrant if they ask for informed consent” and stressed that the law allowed them to question people on that basis.

Contributor

Kevin Rawlinson

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Home Office accused of pressuring judiciary over immigration decisions
Home Office criticised for requesting written reasons from judges when bail is granted to detainees

Diane Taylor

06, May, 2020 @4:00 PM

Article image
Police told not to share immigration data of domestic abuse victims
Victims do not to report crimes through fear of data being shared with Home Office, groundbreaking report says

Jamie Grierson Home affairs correspondent

17, Dec, 2020 @12:01 AM

Article image
UK immigration officials 'have had no information' about hotel quarantine
Border staff not briefed about even basics of Covid protection system starting on Monday, says union

Peter Walker and Haroon Siddique

12, Feb, 2021 @4:32 PM

Article image
Home Office to release information about detainees' access to lawyers
Home Office challenged over failure to ensure all people threatened with removal from UK had access to phones

Diane Taylor

18, Feb, 2020 @5:30 PM

Article image
EU citizens win right to access personal data held by Home Office
Appeal court ruling means people denied settled status or immigration visas can see records used in the case

Lisa O'Carroll Brexit correspondent

26, May, 2021 @11:24 AM

Article image
EU citizens lose court challenge over access to Home Office data
Judge rules Data Protection Act clause denying them right to obtain records is not unlawful

Lisa O'Carroll Brexit correspondent

03, Oct, 2019 @11:14 AM

Article image
Knife crime at record high as overall charge rate falls
Labour says decline in suspects being charged or summonsed is ‘indictment’ of Tory cuts

Jamie Grierson Home affairs correspondent

23, Jan, 2020 @12:41 PM

Article image
Relief for Windrush sisters as removal threat overturned
Bumi Thomas, whose sister got citizenship, wins appeal against removal from UK

Diane Taylor

23, Oct, 2019 @4:09 PM

Article image
UK deportation flight to Jamaica leaves with just seven people on board
Home Office-chartered flight costs an estimated £43,000 a person after Covid fears and high court challenges

Diane Taylor

11, Aug, 2021 @10:24 AM

Article image
Union considers legal action over Channel refugee ‘pushbacks’
Border Force staff express concern at Priti Patel’s proposed tactic of forcing boats back to France

Rajeev Syal Home affairs editor

14, Nov, 2021 @4:00 PM