What is the Windrush review?

The review was set up to shed light on the events that led to the Windrush scandal

What is the purpose of the Windrush review?

It was set up to provide an independent assessment of the events leading up to the Windrush scandal – particularly from 2008 to March 2018 – and to identify the key lessons for the Home Office going forward.

Among the review’s official objectives is the establishment of the key legislative, policy and operational decisions that led to members of the Windrush generation becoming entangled in measures designed for illegal immigrants.

The review will seek to establish why these issues were not identified sooner and what lessons the Home Office can learn. The original aim, as laid out in the terms of reference, was to publish the report by 31 March last year.

Who is on the panel behind the review?

The review is being led by an independent adviser, Wendy Williams, an inspector with Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS). Williams worked with a small team drawn primarily from the Home Office, headed by a Home Office director who was external to immigration.

During the review, Williams was backed up by the Independent Advisory Group (IAG), which was composed of nine members: Dame Ursula Brennan, a retired civil servant and a former permanent secretary at the Ministry of Justice; Sandra Dawson, professor emerita of management studies and former director of Judge Business School University of Cambridge; James Hanratty, former chief executive of the Royal Courts of Justice and immigration judge; Sir Peter Housden, chief executive of Nottinghamshire county council; Dr Omar Khan, director at the Runnymede Trust; Loraine Martins, who was Network Rail’s first director of diversity and inclusion; Dr Mike Philips, broadcaster and writer; Seamus Taylor, lecturer in social policy at Maynooth University, Ireland; and Jacqueline McKenzie, an immigration advisor and barrister to the eastern Caribbean supreme court of Grenada.

How was the review conducted?

The review looked at a broad range of factors surrounding the Windrush scandal.

It considered key events over the 10 years to March 2018, such as key immigration policy decisions leading to Windrush, including legislation and the extent to which equalities laws, policy, practice and principles were considered.

The review looked at key themes and common factors arising from the handling of individual Windrush generation cases, drawing on information from wider case data and current case reviews, as well as evidence from the compensation scheme and Windrush taskforce meetings.

The experience of people impacted by the events – people from the Windrush generation caught up in these cases, including their families, children and grandchildren, and also people inside the Home Office involved in handling them – were considered as part of the review.

The review used workshops and individual interviews, as well as digital searches of Home Office, inspection reports and parliamentary committee papers, and documents held in the National Archives.

Where are we now?

The report is currently going through the process of “Maxwellisation” – the principle under which a report is shown to ministers and officials it is critical of, who are then given the chance to respond.


Jamie Grierson Home affairs correspondent

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Labour MPs warn ministers not to water down Windrush review
Concern after report of phrase ‘institutionally racist’ being removed from draft report

Jamie Grierson Home affairs correspondent

21, Feb, 2020 @1:53 PM

Article image
Windrush: Home Office has failed to transform its culture, report says
Independent expert Wendy Williams finds ‘lack of tangible progress or drive to achieve cultural changes required’

Amelia Gentleman

31, Mar, 2022 @5:04 PM

Article image
Windrush scandal: cross-government group aims to tackle 'terrible' treatment
Home Office says it will launch ad campaign to ensure people are aware of support available

Amelia Gentleman

21, Jun, 2020 @11:01 PM

Article image
Unit tasked with reforming Home Office after Windrush scandal being disbanded
Exclusive: Staff say ‘there’s a lot still to do’ and worry decision signals ‘rolling back’ on promises of change

Amelia Gentleman

19, Jun, 2023 @5:00 AM

Article image
Windrush: Home Office has compensated just 5% of victims in four years
Report from cross-party MPs calls for scheme to be taken away from Priti Patel’s department

Amelia Gentleman

24, Nov, 2021 @12:01 AM

Article image
Windrush inquiry head disappointed as Braverman drops ‘crucial’ measures
Wendy Williams’s remarks come after home secretary confirms three key commitments will not be implemented

Amelia Gentleman and Rajeev Syal

26, Jan, 2023 @7:57 PM

Article image
Windrush claimants 'tip of the iceberg' as payout struggle continues
Just £62,198 issued to date from compensation pot expected to distribute up to £570m

Amelia Gentleman and Peter Walker

09, Feb, 2020 @6:03 PM

Article image
Windrush payments to be fast-tracked and made more generous
Home secretary will announce radical reforms to compensation scheme after criticism

Amelia Gentleman

13, Dec, 2020 @6:00 PM

Article image
Black official quit ‘racist’ Windrush compensation scheme
Exclusive: Former senior Home Office employee Alexandra Ankrah says some colleagues showed ‘complete lack of humanity’

Amelia Gentleman

18, Nov, 2020 @2:13 PM

Article image
Without Paulette Wilson, Windrush might have remained hidden | Amelia Gentleman
Amelia Gentleman recalls the personality, experiences and battles of the leading campaigner

Amelia Gentleman

24, Jul, 2020 @12:11 PM