From trains to buses, we need to rethink UK transport | Letters

Guardian readers respond to recent stories about local bus services and railways

Renationalisation of the railways is a rightly popular Labour policy. But as Owen Jones points out (Don’t sneer at Corbyn: for millions, buses really do matter, 6 July), far more people rely on buses for everyday travel than on trains. Since giving up my car, I have lost countless hours of my life waiting for buses. And at my age, with many ambitions unfulfilled, every hour is precious. We are urged in the name of combating climate change to use public transport rather than private cars, but were I still in employment, it would probably be impossible to do so. Together with rail renationalisation, a programme of reintegration and coordination of bus services nationwide, with consumer input contributing to the design of the services, would be a popular addition to Labour’s manifesto for the next election, appealing in particular to those traditional supporters whom Labour is alleged to have been neglecting in recent years.
Frank Jackson
Harlow, Essex

Your correspondent Wendy Mulville wonders how many of those mocking Mr Corbyn have ever been on a bus (Letters, 7 July), and this reminds me of a story Peter Ustinov used to tell. Two well-heeled and privileged old gentlemen are in their Pall Mall club having a good-natured argument about public transport, in the course of which one of them accuses his friend of never having even been on a bus. Sheepishly he admits this is true, but vows to rectify the situation at once and catch a bus home that very afternoon.

He leaves the club and stands at the bus stop outside. When the bus arrives he gets on and says to the driver “Take me to 7 Belgrave Square, please, quick as you can.”
John Franklin
London

• It can come as no surprise that the government is thinking of not electrifying the Manchester – Leeds railway route (Report, 2 July). From the start HS2 (the design bureau) has designed stations in Leeds and Manchester for HS2 (the route) which cannot form part of the east-west “HS3” route. What are they playing at? But a wholly new high- speed route is in reach. It is described in http://www.thornshapedroute.com/ and closely follows the M62 which was designed and built in 10 years. It goes on viaduct over the village of Newhey at gradients which high-speed trains can easily climb. Why this foot-dragging? Is the elephant in the room the realisation building HS3 would create a ring of cities round the southern Pennines, so closely linked as to amount to “one city” bigger than London?
Michael Bell
Newcastle upon Tyne

• I would like to express my thanks to the many staff at Clapham Junction and East Croydon stations who were unfailingly kind, courteous and helpful amidst the chaos that has prevailed on the Southern and Gatwick Express network. They were all so cheerful and went out of their way to answer questions, look up routes and times and help people on the platforms. And handed out free water!

While Network Rail must answer for the failure properly to invest in infrastructure and maintenance, the hardworking staff must be complemented and admired for their care and concern for passengers.
Pamela Mayorcas
London

• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com

• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters

Letters

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
UK’s rail network suffering from lack of joined-up thinking | Letters
Letters: Readers respond to news of scrapped rail electrification plans and the folly of HS2

Letters

24, Jul, 2017 @6:23 PM

Article image
Closing railway lines has injured England | Letters
Letters: David Bricknell on the damage done by John Major’s rail privatisation and the setting up of Railtrack, and Alan Whitehouse points out that Scotland and Wales seem far better than England at reopening old lines

Letters

08, Oct, 2019 @4:35 PM

Article image
Rail privatisation has been a disaster for taxpayers | Letters
Letters: A renationalised railway would require less government subsidies and provide better value for money for the taxpayer and better services, writes Iain Kitt

Letters

17, Jun, 2018 @4:55 PM

Article image
Let’s replace the HS2 project with local transport investment | Letters
Letters: Scrapping HS2 could mean £500m each for 112 towns and cities, writes Bill Dodds, while David Biggs explains why Network Rail is selling off its commercial property arm

Letters

11, Jun, 2018 @5:01 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on buses: power to the passengers | Editorial
Editorial: Ever since they were deregulated, profits have come first. Manchester mayor Andy Burnham must now push back

Editorial

20, Jun, 2019 @5:43 PM

Article image
Northern axes trains as RMT calls for transport secretary to resign
Operator reduces services after chaos triggers union demand for minister’s resignation

Frances Perraudin North of England reporter

01, Jun, 2018 @5:14 PM

Article image
Warnings of 'anger and outrage' if Transpennine electrification axed
Plans to electrify the Manchester to Leeds route have been on hold since 2015

Gwyn Topham Transport correspondent

01, Jul, 2018 @3:37 PM

Article image
HS2 and the continuing north-south divide | Letters
Letters: Mixed reactions to Simon Jenkins’ call to halt the planned high-speed rail link between London and the Midlands

Letters

12, Aug, 2018 @4:21 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on Chris Grayling’s rail plans: small-minded, ideological and partisan | Editorial
Editorial: The UK government is putting more money into transport infrastructure but its dogmatic approach again risks benefiting the south at the expense of the north

Editorial

06, Dec, 2016 @6:43 PM

Article image
Transport suffers deepest cuts after London subsidy axed
DfT faces cut of 37% as Transport for London prepares to lose entire operational budget by 2020, fuelling concerns over higher fares

Gwyn Topham

25, Nov, 2015 @6:21 PM