Committee chair attacks government for Trident malfunction secrecy

Julian Lewis MP criticises government’s ‘unnecessary surreptitiousness’ as Michael Fallon declines invitation to hearing

The chairman of parliament’s defence watchdog has criticised the government’s “unnecessary surreptitiousness” over the Trident missile malfunction, as Michael Fallon declined an invitation to appear before his committee.

Dr Julian Lewis, who leads the House of Commons defence committee, said the defence secretary had declined the offer to give evidence because “he did not feel he could usefully add anything to what he has previously said, even in a closed session”.

Appearing in parliament on Monday, Fallon rebuffed dozens of questions from MPs about the malfunctioning of the Trident missile in a test off the coast of Florida last June, just days before a Commons vote on renewing the nuclear deterrent.

The cabinet minister insisted the test of the HMS Vengeance submarine and its crew had been successful and there was “absolute faith” in the capabilities of the Trident programme.

However, Labour and SNP MPs are urging an inquiry into what went wrong and why it was kept quiet until a Sunday Times report at the weekend.

Ahead of a hearing of the Commons defence committee, Lewis said it was “unfortunate” that Fallon would not attend even in private and criticised the government’s handling of the incident.

“It is unnecessary surreptiousness about something that could have been dealt with in a perfectly straightforward way,” he said.

What is Trident? Britain’s nuclear deterrent explained

Adm Lord West, the former navy chief, did appear before the committee, where he said anyone who thought it could be kept secret was “stupid or foolhardy” and explained that the Russian government would almost certainly have known about the malfunction.

“The Russians regularly used to have a ship to monitor it and of course they monitor it from space as well,” he said, adding: “I’m sure they are very well aware that it didn’t go all the way down to Ascension [Island] or wherever it is supposed to go.”

He said the the UK and US were “joined at the hip in the deterrent world”, amid reports – denied by Ministry of Defence sources – that the White House had asked Britain to keep quiet about the malfunction.

Asked how it could affect the US-UK relationship, West said: “On this occasion, it would appear there was some issue with the actual missile. The missile is an American missile. It is exactly the same one as the Americans use ... This is a telemetry missile and what it would mean is that something went wrong with that telemetry missile. That is primarily an American issue. I’m sure it was a minor thing and it was resolved.”

West said the indications were that the test suffered a “minor hiccup” and there was no reason why Fallon could not disclose the date when the test took place.

“I don’t know the date, but ... I could probably phone up Mr Putin. I did a favour for him once rescuing some submariners – and he would probably tell me,” he added.

A second witness, Prof Michael Clarke, a former director of the Royal United Services Institute, who examined some of the evidence held by the Sunday Times, said he thought the initial newspaper story was accurate.

He said the evidence that the missile test was aborted suggests it could have been heading for land because of an error with its navigation programming – known as telemetry.

“American sources reported on CNN say that the missile had to be diverted into the ocean to self-destruct, which suggests it may have been heading for land if it had to be diverted into the ocean, if that statement is technically correct,” he said.

“That is consistent with what the Sunday Times had information on but could not then confirm, that the missile may have been heading in towards Florida. It does suggest, if that is true, that there was a fairly major telemetry failure [and] that the missile may have been not just uncertain in its flight but may have been genuinely going on the wrong track. But that, I stress, is only confirmed by other journalistic sources so far.”

Clarke said the test may have taken place on 21 or 22 June, and some sort of failure in the guidance system “seems now to be reasonably certain”.

He said Lockheed Martin, which makes the missile, said there have been 161 successful tests and this was the 162nd.

Contributor

Rowena Mason Deputy political editor

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Government pressed over Trident costs secrecy
Withholding of key data would make a mockery of value-for-money study into nuclear missile submarines, say critics

Richard Norton-Taylor, security editor

15, Jan, 2011 @12:06 AM

Article image
MPs accuse Theresa May of covering up Trident malfunction
Labour and SNP call on prime minister to explain whether she knew of failed test before renewal vote last July

Haroon Siddique and Rowena Mason

22, Jan, 2017 @8:43 PM

Article image
Cameron may hold Trident vote early amid Labour turmoil
MPs may be asked on 18 July to confirm renewal of nuclear deterrent, potentially plunging Labour into fresh in-fighting

Heather Stewart and Peter Walker

07, Jul, 2016 @4:05 PM

Article image
MoD mistakes led to Trident upkeep costs rising by £1.35bn
Report exposes delays and the surging price of maintaining Britain’s nuclear deterrent

Rajeev Syal

10, Jan, 2020 @12:00 AM

Article image
Fallon's Trident misfire is one from the Alternative Facts playbook
Tories out in force to protect their man by congratulating him on refusing to admit that what had happened had happened.

John Crace

23, Jan, 2017 @9:38 PM

Article image
Replacing Trident will cost at least £205bn, campaigners say
Research from the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament also suggests cost will be much higher than previously estimated

Richard Norton-Taylor

11, May, 2016 @11:01 PM

Article image
Trident renewal: would £205bn be a price worth paying?
Cost has become more of an issue at a time of budget pressures, but MoD has been coy about giving an overall estimate

Ewen MacAskill Defence correspondent

17, Jul, 2016 @3:22 PM

Article image
MoD cannot fall back on usual excuses to explain Trident misfire | Ewen MacAskill
When opposition parties press for answers the government cannot dismiss this catastrophic test as trial and error

Ewen MacAskill Defence correspondent

22, Jan, 2017 @6:02 PM

Article image
Labour split deepens as Thornberry urges MPs not to back Trident
Shadow foreign secretary says MPs should not support government nuclear plan, but leadership challenger says he will

Peter Walker

17, Jul, 2016 @2:30 PM

Article image
UK’s Trident plan incompatible with non-proliferation treaty, peers told
Ex-Foreign Office boss and LSE academics warn against planned increase in nuclear weapon stockpile

Patrick Wintour Diplomatic editor

18, May, 2021 @2:21 PM