Hostile states pose 'fundamental threat' to Europe, says MI6 chief

Although Alex Younger does not name specific country, he makes clear that Russia is target of his remarks

The head of the British intelligence agency MI6, Alex Younger, has said cyber-attacks, propaganda and subversion from hostile states pose a “fundamental threat” to European democracies, including the UK.

In a rare speech by an MI6 chief while in office, Younger did not specifically name Russia but left no doubt that this was the target of his remarks. Russia has been accused of interfering in the US presidential election and there are concerns it could do the same in French and German elections next year.

He did mention Russia in relation to Syria, portraying Russian military support for the country’s president, Bashar al-Assad, in the takeover of Aleppo and elsewhere as potentially creating a long-term problem that could increase radicalisation.

“In Aleppo, Russia and the Syrian regime seek to make a desert and call it peace. The human tragedy is heartbreaking,” Younger said.

Russia has moved ever closer to centre stage for the US and UK intelligence agencies over the last year. During the US election campaign Donald Trump said he would seek to engage in some sort of discourse with Vladimir Putin, the Russian president.

Younger delivered the speech at the headquarters of the Secret Intelligence Service, the official name for MI6, at Vauxhall Cross in central London. It was the first time an MI6 chief has made a speech at the HQ, a move aimed at trying to show the secret organisation is making an effort to be a bit more transparent.

He described the internet as having turned the work of the intelligence services on its head and said it represented “an existential threat” as well as an opportunity.

He said hybrid warfare – which Russia has employed in Ukraine, though he again did not mention Russia – was a dangerous phenomenon. “The connectivity that is at the heart of globalisation can be exploited by states with hostile intent to further their aims deniably,” he said.

“They do this through means as varied as cyber-attacks, propaganda or subversion of democratic process. Our job is to give the government the information advantage: to shine a light on these activities and help our country and our allies, in particular across Europe, build the resilience they need to protect themselves.

“The risks at stake are profound and represent a fundamental threat to our sovereignty. They should be a concern to all those who share democratic values.”

Younger declined to provide details of how Britain was responding to such threats, citing operational reasons, but it is known the UK government does not see a need to respond to Russia in a symmetrical way, such as launching a counter-cyber-attack. Instead it could launch a series of counter-measures such as sanctions.The US intelligence services claim to have evidence that Russia was behind the leaking of information from the Democratic party that undermined Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign. Senators are pushing for the White House to have any such intelligence declassified. Russia has denied any such involvement.

Younger ran through various threats posed to the UK other than cyber-security, noting that counter-terrorism, his speciality, had been a niche concern when he began his career but had now become central. He said the UK intelligence and security services had disrupted 12 terrorist plots in the UK since June 2013. MI5 and the police were running hundreds of investigations into those intent on carrying out or supporting terrorist atrocities.

“As I speak, the highly organised external attack-planning structures within Daesh [the preferred government name for Islamic State], even as they face military threat, are plotting ways to project violence against the UK and our allies without ever having to leave Syria.”

He said the events unfolding in Syria created as many, if not more, problems. The strongest weapon against international terrorism was legitimacy, he said, and Assad, backed by Russia, did not have it. The end result could be an increase in terrorism.

“If you doubt the link between legitimacy and effective counter-terrorism, then – albeit negatively – the unfolding tragedy in Syria will, I fear, provide proof. I believe Russian conduct in Syria, allied with that of Assad’s discredited regime, will, if they do not change course, provide a tragic example of the perils of forfeiting legitimacy.

“In defining as a terrorist anyone who opposes a brutal government, they alienate precisely that group that has to be on side if the extremists are to be defeated.”

In a reference to the Chilcot report on Iraq, he came as close as anyone from MI6 to acknowledging that the agency had made a huge mistake through its part in falsely claiming Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction before the 2003 invasion. The Chilcot report singled out the intelligence agencies for falling into line with what Tony Blair’s government wanted rather challenging it over WMD.

“A vital lesson I take from the Chilcot report is the danger of groupthink. I will do anything I can to stimulate a contrary view: to create a culture where everyone has the confidence to challenge, whatever their seniority,” Younger said.

He played down the impact of Brexit and the Trump election win. “I’m often asked what effect the big political changes of 2016, Brexit and the US election result, will have on these relationships. My answer is that I will aim for, and expect, continuity.”

Comments made by Trump on the campaign trail such as support for the US resuming torture would create legal problems for MI6 if the president-elect was to follow through. But there is scepticism in the US intelligence community that Trump will actually implement this, and there are already signs that he is backing off.

Younger did not directly address the torture issue. But one remark could be read as a promise that MI6 would not be implicated in any such move. “We can work with a wide range of partner countries overseas, partners who often do not share our laws but who do know our red lines,” he said.

Contributor

Ewen MacAskill Defence and intelligence correspondent

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
US and UK blame Russia for 'malicious' cyber-offensive
Security officials issue alert directly blaming Kremlin for attack as US warns Moscow it is ‘pushing back hard’

Ewen MacAskill Defence correspondent

16, Apr, 2018 @6:23 PM

Article image
Hostile states trying to steal coronavirus research, says UK agency
Experts say Russia, Iran and China likely to be behind cyber-attacks on universities

Jamie Grierson and Hannah Devlin

03, May, 2020 @3:12 PM

Article image
Nato must defend western democracy against Russian hacking, say Fallon
UK defence secretary accuses Moscow of ‘weaponising misinformation’ to disable democratic machinery

Ewen MacAskill Defence correspondent

03, Feb, 2017 @8:12 AM

Article image
Russia accused of cyber-attack on chemical weapons watchdog
Netherlands expelled four GRU officers after alleged attacks on OPCW and UK Foreign Office

Pippa Crerar, Jon Henley and Patrick Wintour

04, Oct, 2018 @2:48 PM

Article image
Russia is biggest threat to UK since cold war, says head of British army
Gen Sir Nick Carter gives stark warning of ‘complex and capable security challenge’ for Nato

Ewen MacAskill

23, Jan, 2018 @12:23 AM

Article image
UK accuses Kremlin of ordering series of 'reckless' cyber-attacks
Foreign Office increases pressure on Russia after Skripal poisoning

Patrick Wintour Diplomatic editor

03, Oct, 2018 @11:01 PM

Article image
UK ministers will no longer claim 'no successful examples' of Russian interference
Change of official line is first admission that Kremlin may have distorted UK elections

Dan Sabbagh

15, Mar, 2020 @12:00 PM

Article image
Boris Johnson to tell Russia to 'keep nose' out of European elections
British foreign secretary says Moscow must ‘show they can be trusted again’ amid fears it is meddling with democratic processes

Daniel Boffey in Brussels

06, Mar, 2017 @2:47 PM

Article image
The Guardian view on cyberwar: an urgent problem | Editorial
Editorial: The internet is now used as a low-level weapon of war. How should Britain best defend itself?

Editorial

22, Jan, 2018 @5:42 PM

Article image
Britain has offensive cyberwar capability, top general admits
Gen Sir Patrick Sanders says Boris Johnson has told him to ensure UK is major cyber power

Dan Sabbagh Defence and security editor

25, Sep, 2020 @5:00 PM