UK drops security claim blocking Pakistani’s lawsuit over ‘torture’

Government abandons argument that UK-US intelligence ties preclude letting Yunus Rahmatullah sue for damages

The UK government has abandoned its long-standing claim that relations with Washington would suffer if a Pakistani citizen who claims he was tortured by British and American troops was allowed to sue for damages in court.

Yunus Rahmatullah says he was tortured over a 10-year period after being captured by British special forces in Iraq and handed over to US troops in 2004. He was released by the US without charge in May.

The British government made the concession as a former American ambassador roundly dismissed the government’s case.

“It is highly unlikely the US government would limit intelligence cooperation with the UK if British courts heard Rahmatullah’s or similar claims,” Tom Pickering told the Guardian.

“The UK government’s position is based on a misconception of US national security strategy and the importance the US government accords the rule of law”, he said.

The senior American diplomat, who served under presidents Reagan and Bush, added: “To sever, or somehow restrict, the intelligence relationship with the UK would simply be contrary to US national security.”

He said allegations of mistreatment by US forces in Iraq and Afghanistan had already been acknowledged by the US government. “Ventilating them once more in a court of law is highly unlikely to cause any harm to US-UK ties. It makes little sense for the US government to be offended by allegations that are already public,” Pickering said.

US sanctioning of activities that amounted to torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment in violation of US and international law led to serious abuse in Iraq and Afghanistan, including in Rahmatullah’s case, he added.

It was American mistreatment of detainees that had a negative impact on US relations with its allies, Pickering said. “Foreign militaries, including the UK, limited cooperation with the US military as a result.”

Pickering has intervened in the Rahmatullah case heard before Mr Justice Leggatt in the high court on Tuesday. He has signed an expert witness statement challenging claims about damage to UK‑US relations made by Foreign Office officials.

Lawyers for the Ministry of Defence and Foreign Office made their concession following a recent appeal court ruling rejecting a similar argument made by MI5 and MI6 in the case of Abdel Hakim Belhaj and his Moroccan wife, Fatima Bouchar, who were abducted and secretly rendered to Tripoli in a joint MI6-CIA operation. The couple say they were tortured by Muammar Gaddafi’s security forces.

The court of appeal ruled last month: “There is a compelling public interest in the investigation by the English courts of these very grave allegations. The risk of displeasing our allies or offending other states … cannot justify our declining jurisdiction on grounds of act of state over what is a properly justiciable claim.”

Government lawyers indicated on Tuesday they would challenge that judgment in the supreme court.

Kat Craig, a director of the legal charity Reprieve, said: “The government’s desperate attempts to duck responsibility for its role in rendition and torture are fast becoming a national embarrassment.

“Seemingly no one – not even a former senior US ambassador – sees their claims that this case would damage UK relations with the US as at all credible.”

Sapna Malik, of the law firm Leigh Day, which is representing Rahmatullah, said: “Given the gravity of the allegations raised in Mr Rahmatullah’s case, it is right that the British government has today conceded that it is bound by this principle.

“What is frustrating for our clients, however, is ... there is yet further delay as the government insists on appealing [against] the decision and pursuing its untenable position all the way up to the supreme court.”

Last year the supreme court described Rahmatullah’s treatment by UK and US forces as unlawful and a possible war crime. “The, presumably forcible, transfer of Mr Rahmatullah from Iraq to Afghanistan is, at least prima facie, a breach of article 49 [of the fourth Geneva convention],” it said.

Contributor

Richard Norton-Taylor

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
UK supreme court to rule on government responsibility for alleged rendition
Judgments on alleged treatment of jihadi suspects could define extent of human rights protections overseas

Owen Bowcott and Ian Cobain

17, Jan, 2017 @6:00 AM

Article image
UK's secret policy on torture revealed
Exclusive: Document shows intelligence officers instructed to weigh importance of information sought against pain inflicted

Ian Cobain

04, Aug, 2011 @11:42 AM

Article image
Public need answers in 'shocking' MI6 rendition scandal, says senior Tory
Andrew Tyrie says it is essential to establish who authorised secret operations ‘to draw a line under this sorry episode’

Richard Norton-Taylor

01, Jun, 2016 @11:47 AM

Article image
Government must ‘come clean’ over MI6 role in Libyan renditions
Human rights lawyers ask for release of MI5 letter to Tony Blair attacking British intelligence role in torture of Libyans

Richard Norton-Taylor

13, Jun, 2016 @5:20 PM

The torture memos show how illegal wars turn even the nicest people bad | Simon Jenkins
Simon Jenkins: The deceit, the slaughter, the atrocity, the abuse of human rights. Today, Hannah Arendt's banality of evil is everywhere

Simon Jenkins

11, Feb, 2010 @9:30 PM

Police to investigate MI6 over rendition and torture of Libyans

Criminal inquiry announced as DPP says there is not enough evidence to prosecute agents over Pakistan and Afghanistan allegations

Ian Cobain

12, Jan, 2012 @2:16 PM

Article image
UK inquiry on rendition and torture to be handed to ISC

Decision on stalled inquiry follows years of assurances by ministers that inquiry would be headed by senior judge

Ian Cobain and Richard Norton-Taylor

18, Dec, 2013 @11:59 AM

Article image
Libyan dissidents sue MI6 officer over abduction and torture claims
Abdul Hakim Belhaj and Sami al-Saadi serve claim on Sir Mark Allen in first test of legislation described as a 'licence to kill'

Richard Norton-Taylor and Ian Cobain

31, Jan, 2012 @6:00 AM

Article image
UK intelligence agencies spying on lawyers in sensitive security cases
Internal MI5, MI6 and GCHQ documents reveal routine interception of legally privileged communications

Owen Bowcott, legal affairs correspondent

07, Nov, 2014 @7:30 AM

Article image
Abdel Hakim Belhaj torture case may be heard in secret court
Claim against Jack Straw, brought by Gaddafi victim and his wife, may be heard in secret under new Justice and Security Act

Ian Cobain

21, May, 2013 @7:46 PM