Succession: this glittering show will end on a high that we’ll be talking about in 30 years’ time

As the Roy family’s fleet of helicopters land for their final outing, there’s no point in resisting this sumptuous programme. There really is nothing else like this on TV

I’m about to articulate one of the most controversial opinions of 2023, so do whatever you need to brace yourself: I’ve never really got Succession. Before you start, yes, I can see that it’s good. Yes, I can see that it is sumptuous, dense and brilliant, and that at its best it has some of the finest dialogue not just on TV now but on TV ever. I know it’s a thinly veiled portrait of the Murdochs and it’s whip-smart and Machiavellian.

But, sometimes, watching it I feel as if I’m being cornered at a party by someone telling me about a non-fiction book I “have to read” while I watch other people laughing and having fun. It feels clever in the same way that putting your hand up and saying the right answer in a classroom is clever: in a smug and self-satisfied way. Truly, over three seasons, I’m not sure Succession has ever matched the dagger-like family dynamics of the Christmas episode of Peep Show that preceded it. I know you like it when Logan Roy growls “Fuck off”, but it’s no “Cauliflower is traditional!” and it never will be.

Season four, then (Monday 27 March, Sky Atlantic), and time for me to swallow great mouthfuls of humble pie. We open with soaring drone shots of California; we watch New York City twinkle from afternoon to night. The Roy family are at war – it was ever thus – and different factions are sorted into different sides that could shift over the course of a single private-jet phone call. There’s some business going on, but that never really actually matters. Roman is still slimily upfront, cousin Greg still blinks into every room as if it’s his first day on Earth, Shiv is playing five different sides and coming out on the bottom of every one, Kendall is in resplendent tech bro form, a $600 plain black cap and some stuttered blue-sky thinking. I’m convinced Brian Cox has never read a Succession script and just goes around like that. I’m convinced that Alan Ruck’s loser-fantasist Connor is actually the glue that sticks this whole machine together.

It’s great that it’s a lot of quite nasty, unlikable people being funny. It’s great that it uses every second of the hour allotted to it, and I leave every episode feeling breathless with how much just happened. And that I never ever know what’s going on, and every time I feel as if I might just get it, a new character calls in on speakerphone and erupts everything all over again. And that there are loads of helicopters.

Another great thing is its portrayal of money, which I always thought I wanted – it would be nice to have a swimming pool and not have to worry about anything – but in the Roy family, it seems like hell. You are constantly pulled into meetings, nobody ever gives a straight answer, you can’t even trust the people you’re having sex with and despite being rich you still have to stay at work really late. I’m not sure it’s worth having three phones and a dad who hates you for that.


A note on season four being the last: it has to be for three reasons. First, it is simply not sustainable to see these characters U-turn then U-turn then U-turn again. One of the key dramas of this show is watching as each of the three children crawl sheepishly back to Daddy, often at their own behest, and there’s only so many times we can watch that happen before all disbelief is suspended. (Do you really want to watch Kendall implode again? Come on! What’s wrong with you?)

Second, what makes watching these horrible people be horrible to one another satisfying is the calm knowledge that, by the time everything shakes out, there will be one barely deserving winner and several embittered losers – it is very much like a dramatised version of The Apprentice. There’s only so long this can go on for without that closure, and four 10-episode seasons feels about right.

Third, and most crucially: all the generationally classic TV shows need to end on their own terms, before a quality nosedive affects their own legacy (see: Apprentice, The). Based on the glittering episodes I’ve seen so far, Succession intends to go out on a peak that people will still be talking about in 20 or 30 years.

I know this is annoying, and I know this is just something smart people say to make them sound even smarter but: there really is nothing like Succession on TV.

• The headline and text of this article were amended on 30 March 2023 to change two uses of “glimmering” to “glittering”, in order to reflect the intended meaning.

Contributor

Joel Golby

The GuardianTramp

Related Content

Article image
Shiv, Logan – or Cousin Greg? Who will come out on top in Succession?
As the hit drama’s final season approaches, it’s all-out war for the title of CEO at Waystar Royco – but who will claim the ultimate prize?

Stuart Heritage

21, Mar, 2023 @8:00 AM

Article image
‘The twisted egos and mediocre minds are spot on’: boardroom survivors on how true Succession is
From the scheming super-brats to sweary CEOs, just how realistic is the world of the Roys? As the power-crazed family return for their final showdown, high-fliers reveal all

Michael Hogan

20, Mar, 2023 @12:40 PM

Article image
Citadel: this spy thriller is a rip-roaring, non-stop actionfest
Richard Madden, Stanley Tucci and Priyanka Chopra Jones blast their way through this fun, zippy series from the Russo brothers. Just don’t take it too seriously…

Joel Golby

27, Apr, 2023 @2:06 PM

Article image
Wednesday: Netflix have absolutely smashed this fantastic Addams Family revamp
From brilliant gothic direction to casting that is absolutely perfect (Catherine Zeta-Jones as Morticia!), this series focusing on the creepy clan’s daughter is an utter joy

Joel Golby

19, Nov, 2022 @7:00 AM

Article image
Prue and Danny’s Death Road Trip: this might be the best assisted dying debate ever
Ignore the clunky title, this documentary – which sees the Tory MP and his famous TV chef mother spar over death – is fascinating. Not least because of their weird relationship…

Joel Golby

11, Feb, 2023 @7:00 AM

Article image
The Curse: only a name as big as Emma Stone could make TV this squirm-in-your-seat good
This odd, tense and phenomenally refreshing drama sees the Oscar winner join a cast you cannot resist watching – featuring artist-in-chief Nathan Fielder and Uncut Gems creator Benny Safdie

Joel Golby

10, Nov, 2023 @7:00 AM

Article image
Litvinenko: David Tennant’s accent in this crime drama is so bad, it’s unwatchable
The real-life source material about a poisoned spy is fantastic. Shame about the tedious plotting and the actor doing a voice that weirdly channels a certain celebrity…

Joel Golby

10, Dec, 2022 @9:00 AM

Article image
Sex Actually With Alice Levine: no other presenter is this good at bizarre intercourse
From VR brothels to ‘synthetic’ wives, Levine’s fun and empathic presenting style is just perfect. If we’re ever to grasp the dizzying world of tech-inspired sex, she’s a must

Joel Golby

25, Feb, 2023 @7:00 AM

Article image
Gunther’s Millions: could this tale of a multi-millionaire dog kill the documentary for good?
A highly salacious story lies behind footage of a diamond chain-wearing German shepherd on his private jet. But this series’s desperation to create memes risks undermining its entire genre

Joel Golby

28, Jan, 2023 @7:00 AM

Article image
Fatal Attraction: Joshua Jackson is pitch perfect in this remake of the 80s erotic thriller
The actor is fantastic in the Michael Douglas role of this iconic movie, with Lizzy Caplan doing a particularly intense take on Glenn Close’s part. Here’s to remakemania!

Joel Golby

29, Apr, 2023 @6:00 AM